Albania has officially drawn the
line, Sazan 'lsland is being cleared. In an stunning turn of events, Albanian authorities have
launched an active enforcement operation to kick
out foreign developers and private security
personnel occupying Sazan Island. The decisive
action marks a total collapse of the controversial €1.4 billion luxury real estate deal that aimed to turn the protected national marine reserve and
former military base into an exclusive private playground for global elites,
The eviction comes after four consecutive weeks of historic
hundred-thousand-strong protests that completely
shut down the capital city of Tirana, refusing to allow their native coastlines and ecologically sensitive wetlands to be privatized by foreign
investors, the Albanian public unified under a
single, unyielding demand: "Albania is not for sale, the courts faced with a historic political crisis, mounting
domestic fury, and a widening anti-corruption
investigation by special prosecutors (SPAK), the
government was forced to pivot, by deploying state forces to reclaim Sazan lsland, Albania has
sent a clear message to international billionaires
and foreign developers trying to bypass environmental protection laws, This historic victory for citizen-led activism proves that the collective voice of a nation can successfully overpower backroom corporate deals and protect sovereign land.
The people spoke, and the
government had to listen.
The Iranian navy, which has been destroyed eight times, has apparently closed the Strait of Hormuz again, because the United States, for the seventh time, won the war that wasn’t a war, so now the United States has to open the Strait of Hormuz that was already open before the not-war began.
The not-war began because Iran had uranium that was totally, completely, beautifully obliterated, so they can’t build the nuclear bomb they weren’t building, which is why the United States had to start the not-war it definitely didn’t start.
Now the United States, which has nuclear weapons, is threatening to use nuclear weapons to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons, because nuclear weapons are far too dangerous for countries with nuclear weapons to allow other countries to have.
If the United States saw the United States doing what the United States does in other countries, the United States would invade the United States to liberate the United States from the tyranny of the United States.
I wonder if the folk of Kenmore know about us. I think they are still fighting this development by some faceless American company who are buying up all of Kenmore on the banks of Loch Tay and want to turn it into some sort of billionaires fantasy island. Their MSP a Mr J Swinney has done feck all to stop it. The Taymouth Castle Estate Redevelopment is the name of this thing. Could the CoR and Scottish Law be used to aid the locals to either fight this thing or influence it to make it work for local people too?
Maybe now it will be understood how important it is that the Scottish Crown wasn’t replaced by a joint British one! Title to Scotland remains with the crown and there’s no legal mechanism to give Charlie boy or his government or its administration access to that title. Time to fight for our rights, funnily enough rights based on hoary old historical facts!! (I know you already know that, Ian! 🙂)
Roger Waters, Pink Floyd co-founder:
"I'm ready to admit I break down in tears every morning for Gaza."
"Because I'm 80 years old — and I've never witnessed the genocide of an entire people before my eyes every single day." 🎸🇵🇸💔🔥
1/
🧵Things I now believe to be true.
Scotland has not just watched a party finance scandal. It has watched the state, the party machine and the prosecution system close ranks in real time.
The public were expected to notice nothing.
Unfortunately for them, we did.
One of the most horrifying scenes in human history has been revealed.
When Israel forced thousands in Gaza to collect flour mixed with sand due to severe famine.
A moment the world must never forget.
Purely in terms of UK domestic law, an Indyref without London permission is of course illegal.
Sturgeon and Bain always knew the UK Supreme Court would rule that way.
They went there to get Independence blocked.
But Statehood is INTERNATIONAL LAW not domestic law.
Scottish Independence will be of course illegal in UK terms when we take it. That is a given.
We will exercise self-determination against London not with London.
Hussam Ebu Safieh, "İsrail'in rehineler için ölüm cezası" ile öldürülecek olan Filistinli doktorlardan biridir (diğer 95 doktor arasında).
Onu öldürmelerine izin verme.
Bunu yeniden yayınlayın.
A corrupt plea deal that protects Sturgeon and gives Murrell a light sentence would of course have to be ushered through by a complicit judge.
Oh look! The Murrell judge is Lord Young who last week halted the Scottish judicial review on Palestine Action.
Sturgeon was always a Britnat operation to stall Independence.
Liberation Scotland Update June 2026 #1
from C-24 in Managua, Nicaragua
"Scotland actually has three separate claims to the right of self-determination. And bear in mind, the right of self-determination is only the right to decide. It doesn't mean you're automatically independent, it means you have a right to decide your own future without being contested.
"So the first right of determination consists in the fact that multiple prime ministers, and officials of the British state, have categorically, including Keir Starmer back in 2020, have categorically said that the Scots have a right to decide to go it alone; that they have a right to independence if they want.
"In international law, because the Brits don't have a written constitution, this becomes a constitutional principle, if it has been said long enough and often enough by representatives of the state. Prime Minister speaks on behalf of the state, of course. Like Supreme Court speaks on behalf of the state, they're considered to be state organs.
"So now in international law, Scotland has been established as having that right. When David Cameron agreed to an 'opinion poll' that was called a referendum, he agreed in principle to put a mechanism in place to allow that right. He didn't follow up, he didn't allow the international standards. Nonetheless, that precedent was there. So that's one.
"Number two, the British state claims that it's founded on the Treaty and Act of Union, that's its authority. It said that most recently in its submission to a parliamentary report, published in February this year. The constitutional foundation that means its authority is the Treaty and Act of Union. Well, the Treaty Act of Union, have something called a 'condition precedent'.
"Basically means the union is conditional. What's the condition? It's a hoary old, absolutely irrelevant Act 1706 of the Presbyterian Faith, Preservation of Presbyterian Faith, which lifts the Claim of Right as part what has to be ratified along with the articles of the Union.
"Claim of Right gives the people of Scotland, unequivocally, the right to remove a government that no longer serves the interests of people. Very specific about the violations that caused the government to cease to be legitimate and stop them.
"But it very clearly shows that the sovereignty of the nation of Scotland lies with the Scots, and cannot possibly lie with Westminster. So either, and that condition is there, Claim of Right is still there and we still have that right, or there's no union. There's no British state, because precedent comes before, underpins native conditions. Without it, there's no union. With it, we have the right to leave. That's international law, that's treaty law.
"And finally, the right of self-determination for a people who have been made a dependency, that's a colony, by a larger state is absolutely entrenched. It's a fundamental principle of international law.
"Does that apply to Scotland? Absolutely. The British State has said, Scotland is not a dependency, that's a colony, because we have a partnership with the UK, it's a voluntary partnership. We've all heard that. Voluntary partnership requires an agreement. The agreement is the Treaty and Act Union.
"And hey, guess what? This underpinning authority of the British state has never been given effect. We don't have a treaty, and because we don't have a treaty, in other words, we don't have a partnership agreement, we are not a partner. We can only be a dependency. And that means that under International law, Treaty Law, Scotland has a right to decolonize.
"Not secession, not to fight for a remedy to the way the British state has treated us, a fundamental right to decolonization. And that's what we're doing in Nicaragua, because the vast majority of the international community does not know that Scotland is a dependency.
"It has no idea that the United Kingdom is a fraud. It has no idea that Scotland is not part of a unitary state. Once that has been clearly established, everything changes, the whole game changes.
"So everything hangs, basically, on the ability of British state to hood-wink the international community. And Liberation Scotland is here making sure they can't succeed any longer. And then having that formally recognized, that Scotland has this right to self-determination.
"Once that happens, that doesn't make us independent overnight. What it does do, it clears the path. No more Section 30, no more Westminster permission, no more Westminster interference in the right of Scots to decide their future. It's a way, simply a way to clear the road ahead. And after that, it's up to us." @SSalyers2@LiberationScot@broonpot@PAlanMcMahon@thomsonchris@CraigMurrayOrg@rblackqc@IndyScotParty@LiberateScot@SalvoHighlands@ScotSalvo
Two legal cases. One at the HRC and one at the ICJ (a lot of work to make those happen but lots already in place so fingers crossed) plus pushing for a C24 inquiry into Scotland’s situation plus a Salvo campaign to begin demanding the rights our own politicians forgot to try to get for us,
The best thing people can do to help is start saving Scotland here at home. We are going to go after the right of Scots to withhold permission for damaging land/sea use and establishing the location of legal ‘title’. That’s the Scottish Crown which still exists while the ‘British’ Crown is purely England’s. The Scottish Crown is the community of the realm - the people - and because the English decided to put their own crown over Scotland instead of creating a single crown and kingdom, legal title has never passed from the people. A deliberately buried but of constitutional reality but absolutely critical. (Btw that campaign at intnl. level will also reveal the true relationship between England and Scotland - annexation not partnership!) But there needs to be a big domestic campaign. That’s Salvo’s next undertaking. (You need a lot of people to drive the jobs of take back we’re looking for.) It only takes a handful to attend UN meetings and a committee to organise that. But if the handful are not the tip of the spear with the main part coming from the people it will not succeed. So join or set up a Salvo hub and take on a challenge that matters to you. Salvo is short for Salvo jure cujus libet- saving the rights of everyone. It will also be Salvo driving the case against the govt over the sisting of a judicial review of Starmers proscription of Palestine Action on the grounds that it breaches the law at in at least two fundamental respects under the Claim of Right Act. The CoR is condition precedent of treaty and union so bringing an international case on its force in law will also reveal the fact that if the UK was a genuine, unitary state, it would be based on a conditional agreement. So Scots already have the right to kick Westminster to the kerb and go their own way. It’s all about revealing the facts and then acting on them!
Wings Over Scotland has today filed a new complaint with Police Scotland and COPFS against the SNP, on grounds of suspected fraud, theft by appropriation, embezzlement and false or misleading statements, based on new evidence POST-Operation Branchform. https://t.co/orUI13zN5g