@SterlingCooley@gherebean@RealCandaceO Why do you keep saying it is 4:3? That's impossible if Viewsonic doesn't even make 4:3. Also common sense says "who uses 4:3 screen?". Please share why you think it's 4:3.
@stargazerpon@_0fux_ Yeah, I dont want to show video of me walking around my house positioning a camera lol... I can manipulate video just as easy and photos if I wanted to. But I am after truth here. Lets see you show anything, anything at all
@stargazerpon@_0fux_ All I can say is that you can try it yourself if you dont believe all the work I've gone through to help illustrate these photographic principles. Seems I'm the only willing to actually put in the work out of the two of us.
@MsJaneDoeUKnow@knubeltierli I haven't started analyzing the barrel distortion of the wide angle lens yet. So I really dont have anything to say about it. But the Wide angle correction you've applied appears accurate to me.
@Michelleorigin@BlessedMom_7@RealCandaceO I haven't made any claims about that. But "bulky" is subjective. It's possible the barrel distortion from the wide angle lens, and lighting could make a person look extra "bulky". I haven't looked into that part of it.
@AshtonForbes You are wrong. She don’t stretch it. She just obtained a frontal recording of the same footage. I have it too and can confirm she did not alter it.
@SterlingCooley@gherebean@RealCandaceO Why would we assume the aspect ratio has been changed? Clearly it’s a 16:9 monitor, and the image fills the screen. The maker of these monitors only make 16:9 monitors. So that kinda seals it.
@gregpai2025@RealCandaceO Portrait photographers like 70-85mm for headshots for same reasons. You get more realistic proportions of the facial features