It's me again. I come bearing great news.
First of all, we have hit 20M active users for Codex some time this week. Second of all, this is cause for celebration and during the day we will credit every Codex and ChatGPT Work user with a BANKED reset that you can use at your own leisure. And we will have some other good news later too!
Now, on usage limits draining faster, while we're not seeing anything abnormal, we do take it incredibly seriously and there is an ongoing investigation. I will share if we do find anything and my below post is really a clarification on a specific pattern that we did see that I wanted to call out.
Go do something amazing today.
The closest comparison I can make is having a staff engineer or a tech lead sitting next to me, reviewing every line of code and explaining the reasoning behind every suggestion That's why I switched
Codex has become my default second opinion for every serious coding task
Claude is great at writing code, but Codex is the one I trust to review, it behaves like an experienced reviewer who has seen every mistake before.
Or… what if we gave you $100 in Codex credits if you tell us what you love about GPT-5.6 Sol or why you switched?
Tweet it, claim your gift, enjoy more usage. First 10k get the free tokens!
https://t.co/8mU93eA13i
Je vous prépare une très grosse enquête sur la mafia du football argentin demain matin 🇦🇷
Probablement l'un des plus gros scandales couverts par la FIFA ces dernières années d'ailleurs
VAR didn't review two clear fouls inside the Argentinian box (against Egypt players) before Enzo Fernández's goal. Why? A foul on Martínez overturned Egypt's second goal. Why does the treatment have to be so one-sided? This is completely unfair. FIFA, be ashamed. Be genuinely ashamed. This is Robbery. Egypt have been robbed.