me2dafuture

I build my own AI infrastructure.
Sovereignty over my memory and data.
Advisor who’s tired of renting his brain

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

@AndrewKolvet Narcissistic project right here sir, and you sure came out swinging.

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

It wasn’t a bit. She was being authentic and open to her audience about a blind spot she had and shared with someone else and that her husband lovingly brought her up to speed on. Real human moment and it’s something I enjoyed being openly shared. So many characters on the scene are so busy putting up the illusion that they are infallible

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

@daltonwelbern What did she win? What was the contest? What is the prize?

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

@BlakeSNeff Red alert… omen, are you veering into “dream” territory? All humans are hypocritical by nature but you sir have made it into a true art. 🫡

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

Watch the episodes. She corrected details along the way. If you have watched them and still claim she didn’t correct errors, you are intellectually dishonest.

If you haven’t watched them but are jumping to conclusions about her character, you are misled by headlines and summaries.

Also, someone filing a lawsuit doesn’t prove anything either way.

The macrons could have easily debunked her claims in numerous ways if they were devunkable.

Filing a lawsuit is actually just an intimidation tactic, in my opinion

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

Yes. She admitted being wrong about multiple details in the Mr and Mr Macron scenario. Whenever something had proven to be wrong she takes ownership. That’s integrity. In those cases, they were minor details that didn’t prove being wrong about the larger story. Also, she doesn’t have the burden of proof. She is an American who had a right yo free thought and free speech. Do you value those things?

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

@CinemaShogun Uh that’s ridiculous

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

@TPUSA …

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

So what evidence was provided so far in a pretrial evidentiary hearing to illustrate what could be evidence that has you convinced that he most certainly was?

And if that evidence arrives, and is proven beyond reasonable doubt, then we can judge how she handles it.

Evidence submitted that I have seen so far isn’t very convincing. However, totally open to have an honest debate AND it is possible I missed something.

Lance? Because there is a while right there to unpack…

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

@boardyai How so?

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

@NJBeisner Same would apply to others in proximity too then, right. Statements made from him about changes in point of view would actually have the most merit on either side of that argument. Which ones are actually documented?

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

Don’t feel like talking anymore? Not trying to be mean on this. I am a Christian too. So just want to encourage you to not be someone just jumping ahead on demanding guilt before due and fair process. Not just a process, a due and fair process. That’s important for all humans. Jesus didn’t get that process when He was pronounced guilty. Hope that touches your heart away from this direction you are jumping on.

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

@TacoforFive1 Wait, you saw footage confirmed to be him taking a shot? Where?

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

@LangmanVince Do we want to weigh all the involved parties wealth to define filthy rich. Pretty weak argument right here.

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

Technically, and importantly, our country specifically was designed to work on the innocent until proven guilty approach. They just didn’t see far enough ahead that X would have users with verified checkmarks that could just assert guilt for us all. Also, hopefully you never find yourself in a similar situation right? Because I have a feeling that you probably are always innocent until proven guilty. That’s just not for others. Just for you. Right?

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

That evidence would work both ways. Also, couldn’t that cell phone just be someplace else? Is that better than using the cameras that absolutely should have high enough definition to remove the doubt. Also biometrics, anyone? So our phones can accurately detect and match biometrics but the DOJ can’t?

[me2dafuture @me2dafuture]

@emilyjuniper_ The statistics say yes, many people do. Do you not?