The advent of reading “altered people’s consciousness and politics, along with the intellectual feats they were capable of,” @RoseHorowitch argues—and the decline of reading will bring about changes of the same magnitude: https://t.co/OCYJABNvWo
I wrote an essay on how universities becoming more self-referential is causing them to turn inwards, away from the public, diminishing their relevance and capacity to respond to the ongoing epistemic crisis. Link in replies.
As the structures that once gave meaning and sourced identities collapse, narrative identity is the viable approach to conceptualizing modern identities. Since reality is subjective, the self is the primary site of meaning-making. Meaning can no longer be externally sourced.
So the new strategy is to have a symbolic deal between the US and Iran for stabilizing the economy and claiming victory, while Israel continues the war (also on behalf of the US)
@shaabiranks I agree, reading Fanon first explains the current system of domination and coloniality, and then Marx provides structure for understanding how domination is organized through class and material conditions
Yes (to an extent). People assign meaning to encounters based on an internal interpretation structure that is composed of: perception of the other + perception of self + perception of self in relation to other + previous lived experiences
Could the reason obsession and backrooms are popular with a wider range of audiences (compared to previous horror films) be because more people want a viewing experience that is more intensely felt in the body
Most people dismissing Persepolis as “orientalist westen caricature” have not experienced fundamentalist & religious authoritarianism firsthand. The film accurately captures (Islamist) moralized policing + is based on her lived experience (which is not necessarily generalizable)
Marjane Satrapi made a career out of proliferating orientalist western caricatures of her own people. While Satrapi cashed in on racist campaigns thinly veiled by anti-patriarchal rhetoric calling for 'regime change' in Iran, she never once used her platform to speak out against the ongoing existential threats presented by Western powers against Palestinian, Lebanese, Iranian and ALL other Muslim women in West Asia. It's a fitting end for someone who remained blithely silent through three years of genocide in the region that raised her to literally die of grief over the loss of one gangly Swedish white guy.
Persepolis' focus on islamist fundamentalism means that it is (unfortunately) more likely to be co-opted and by western liberals and strategically employed to manufacture consent for interventionism and regime change.
The film was especially formative for me as a teenager in Egypt when the muslim brotherhood and salafists were in power. Some gov. priorities were: policing women's 'un-islamic' clothing, restricting women's right to divorce, using blasphemy laws to silence dissidents, etc
Trying to stay in the present but also cautious of recency bias but also everything is historically situated and meaning requires repeated reference over time
we should normalize talking about our relationships with Time. like do you have a healthy relationship with Time, what is your experience of temporality, etc.