@ ๐ฏ๐น๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ฏ๐ผ๐ we recognize the importance of ๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐ (IM) for managing ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ๐.
we're interested in ๐ต๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ฝ ๐๐ better understand & respond to the rapid change in today's world.
introducing ๐๐ : ๐งต
now that we have good money (#Bitcoin ) and uncensorable communication (#nostr) in cyberspace,
a protocol for mass self-organization via learning is upon us.
โพ๏ธfrom ๐ฬ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐๐ค๐ฉ๐ณ๐ช๐ง๐ต๐ด๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐๐ต๐ช๐ญ (Included in Parerga and Paralipomena)
for the updated version replace <๐ฏ๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ> with <๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป>
โพ๏ธexpanded quote
"It is incredible what a different effect is produced upon the mind by thinking for oneself, as compared with reading. It carries on and intensifies that original difference in the nature of two...
appropriate to his nature and present temper. So it is, that much reading deprives the mind of all elasticity; it is like keeping a spring continually under pressure. The safest way of having no thoughts of oneโs own is to take up a book every moment one has nothing else to do."
@AntonJaegermm it is becoming clear that Hayek asks praxeological questions updated with answers to questions Wiener's cybernetics was asking regarding human-animal-machine coordination, information, feedback, and control. https://t.co/g4JS9L68dz
...Words have frightening power.
All that we have to do is to pick them out of the dictionary and string them in the right order."
โพ๏ธColin Cherry citing Dudley Bailey and Bess Sondel in ๐๐ฃ ๐๐ช๐ข๐๐ฃ ๐พ๐ค๐ข๐ข๐ช๐ฃ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ฃ (1957)
"The Oxford English Dictionary contains about half a million words; the seeds of all our great literature and poetry, of the expressions of our novelists, our historians, and our humorists; they may be used for trivial gossip, or for the fire of rhetoric to inflame a mob...
...Words can demoralize a man into torpor, or they can spring him into delight; they can raise him to the heights of spiritual and aesthetic experience...
...just as the man who always rides, at last forgets how to walk. **This is the case with many learned persons: they have read themselves stupid.**โ
โEssays and Aphorisms : Schopenhauer, Arthur, Hollingdale, R. J.,
more from Arthur on the bad habit of (over)reading >
โWhen we read, another person thinks for us: we merely repeat his mental process...the greater part of the work of thought is already done for us."
"So it comes about that if anyone spends almost the whole day in reading, and by way of relaxation devotes the intervals to some thoughtless pastime, he gradually loses the capacity for thinking...