@AndreasSteno But isn't the point of the University for professors to present and teach their ideas and the students to make up their mind on what is "correct" (as if sth like that exists within social sciences/art) ? Humans will always be biased in one or the other way.
@benjamincowen@AvrgJoeCrypto@GuntherEagleman Lol, he is literally saying "I understand science but I don't trust it", which means he doesn't trust his own understanding. As retard as it gets.
Behold the anti-vax evangelist.
When you contradict their mythology of COVID, they do not debate — they declare.
When you say you were there, they accuse you of lying.
When you describe hallways lined with ventilators and refrigerated trucks behind hospitals, they reply with a video of an empty clinic lobby taken at 9 p.m. on a Tuesday.
Each move is deliberate. Each designed to plant doubt.
You bring data — randomized trials, excess mortality curves, ICU capacity graphs — and they inform you that the data are fabricated. You explain how ventilators are used, and they insist you never understood them. You describe surge staffing, proning teams, tracheostomies at 2 a.m., and they counter with TikTok clips of nurses dancing for 20 seconds between codes.
The performance is the point.
They operate in a closed epistemology. If hospitals were full, it was staged.
If they were not full in a viral lull, the pandemic was fake.
If vaccines reduced admissions, the decline was natural immunity.
If admissions rose before vaccines, it was hospital fraud.
No outcome falsifies the belief. Every outcome confirms it.
This is not skepticism. It is theology.
Show them excess deaths — conspiracy.
Show them ICU occupancy — manipulated.
Show them randomized vaccine trials — rigged.
Show them global replication — coordinated fraud.
Meanwhile, they will tell you they know how to run a ventilator, despite never adjusting PEEP in refractory hypoxemia. They will mock exhausted nurses for dancing as a coping mechanism and then, in the next breath, deny the very surge conditions that made coping necessary.
They deny the fire while criticizing the smoke.
And here is the final absurdity:
They insist hospitals were empty — until the vaccine arrived. Then they insist vaccines didn’t work. The contradiction does not trouble them, because coherence was never the objective. Conversion was.
Doubt is their currency. Outrage is their marketing strategy. Certainty is their costume.
Science revises.
Medicine adapts.
Data accumulates.
But conspiracism calcifies.
And so we arrive here — where those who have never held pressure on a crashing patient accuse those who did of inventing the crash.
Transcutaneous pacing (TCP) is an intervention for unstable bradycardia. Electrical stimulus is provided ~1/s to increase heart rate. With transvenous pacers and chronotropic meds, TCP is mostly limited to the prehospital setting and low-resource centers.
We suck at TCP.
🧵
@smithECGBlog Determine if it's really SVT or maybe ST due to some other underlying pathology. Pericardial effusion/tamponade? Electrical alternans present, but not low voltage. DD other causes of ST/Shock
@AndreasSteno@ketinusaurelis@Micro2Macr0 Your facts don't fit their narrative so they get dismissed. For most people emotions beat facts/knowledge. And fear is the easiest emotion to create in others and also a very powerful one to influence people.
🔥 RV EXCLUSIVE MERCH (5 winners every 24h)
To enter:
- Join the waitlist (link below)
- In the replies, tell us ONE lesson that changed how you invest
- Like + RT this post
We're picking the 5 sharpest replies daily
Winners choose:
→ Hoodie or Cap - Limited Edition
Go!