mefthanse

[mefthanse @mefthanse2773]

Jo jamai tola jharkhand me jameen kabza kar rha uspar kabhi kuch nhi likha jaata
@VoiceOfTribals_

[mefthanse @mefthanse2773]

@Shailes70938431 @rajput_of_india Bhai ye channel hapur ke kuch Muslims chalate hain ye koi rajput nhi hai 2024 elections me rajput vote diversify inke jaise account ne hi kraya tha

[mefthanse @mefthanse2773]

@NenuHanma Avoid writing such comments is it risky for your life. I hope you remember what happened three years ago with a women politician.

[mefthanse @mefthanse2773]

@batman_5679 @DefiantProfesso @Therajatmourya Konsa bayan de diye ki sc st ko -40 par admission de rhe hain sabke liye bola gya hai. Koi bhi nhi chahega ki itni kam marks par koi MD ya medical ka course kare aur ye resources ka bhi waste hai.
Minimum marks criteria hona chahiye.

[mefthanse @mefthanse2773]

@AbhayPaswan01 Kya kar diya

[mefthanse @mefthanse2773]

@akashuchani08 @Theonenameddamn GDP does not measure money transfers. GDP measures the value of newly produced final goods and services within an economy during a specific period. If billionaire simply transfers money to another billionaire, GDP does not increase. Basic economics nhi aati

[Gems Of Replies @GemsOfReplies]

😭

[mefthanse @mefthanse2773]

@AshwaniPan69349 @Imdineshpurohit Gandu saalon jaake dekh lo rss leader phir kyun bol rhe hain ind pak dialogue hona chahiye iska koi jawab hai

[Karan Datta 🇮🇳 @Datta_karan]

When you know Britain signed a deal with a newly partitioned, bleeding India to block 90 percent of its own money and then devalued it by 30 percent overnight, the word independence stops sounding like the right word at all.

Britain did not just delay paying what it owed India. It engineered the conditions to quietly erase a third of it.

By 1947 Britain owed India approximately £1.3 billion. Money India had effectively lent through wartime extraction of resources, labour and grain. When negotiations began over repayment, Britain made an argument designed to sound responsible. If the entire sum was demanded at once, it would trigger a global financial crisis and India would end up with nothing at all.

India was in no position to push back.

The country was simultaneously managing Partition violence, the largest forced migration in human history and the chaos of building two new nations from the wreckage of one. Britain understood exactly how little leverage Indian negotiators had in that moment and structured the deal accordingly.

Roughly 90 percent of what India was owed got frozen in London. Released slowly over the next decade. No interest attached.

Then came 1949. The real fraud.

Britain devalued the pound against the dollar by 30.5 percent in a single move. Since virtually all of India's locked funds were denominated in pounds, India's reserves lost a third of their purchasing power overnight without a single rupee actually being spent or stolen in any conventional sense.

No theft required. Just one currency decision in London that silently erased decades of value from money India had already earned and was simply waiting to receive.

The country that supposedly handed India freedom was simultaneously sitting on India's money, controlling when it got released and quietly devaluing what remained of it.

That is not the behaviour of a generous departing coloniser.

That is the behaviour of a debtor managing its creditor while pretending the relationship had already ended.

[mefthanse @mefthanse2773]

@BhatiBalki99676 @askrajeshsahu Are bsdk band karo apna victim card

[Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק @Ofer_binshtok]

The persecution of Hindus by Muslims in Bangladesh shows what ethnic cleansing and genocide look like. Their population has collapsed by more than 71%, from 28% in 1940 down to 7.8% in 2020. The Hindu minority still left there faces brutal persecution. Its girls are kidnapped, raped, and forced to convert to Islam and marry their kidnappers. These figures are estimates from various historical accounts within the accepted range.

[KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱 @BanCheneProduct]

Muslim people, claiming to be friends among you, do things to you that you don't even realize.

"I stole the idol of Lord Shri Krishna from my Hindu neighbor's home and on Janmashtami I would secretly feed meat to my Hindu friend Sushī. Doing that gave me a great deal of peace."

On the occasion of Janmashtami, BBC published some excerpts from the biography of the Urdu writer Ismat Chughtai.

In her autobiography the writer revealed how she stole the idol of Lord Shri Krishna from her Hindu neighbor's house and, on Janmashtami, would secretly feed meat to her Hindu friend Sushī.

According to the BBC translation of Ismat Chughtai's autobiography 'Kagazi Hai Pairahan', Ismat Chughtai writes that since she knew there was no contagion in fruit, dal moth and biscuits, she would on Janmashtami deceptively feed meat to her Hindu friend...

The writer says that doing this gave her a great deal of peace.........

This is their truth.

Whether common or elite, their jihadi mentality is the same for the entire Hindu community.

[Team Hindu United @TeamHinduUnited]

Nek Ali Khan, posing as "Ankit Kumar", befriended a Hindu woman in Jabalpur, MP.

The two entered into a live-in relationship for the last five years and had physical relations.

When she insisted on marriage, he revealed his real identity, took her to Mumbai, where his mother asked her to perform Mujra in a bar.

She was allegedly sold for ₹5 lakh, but escaped and filed a complaint with help from Hindu groups.

[mefthanse @mefthanse2773]

@Shakeel39119135 @ANI_MP_CG_RJ To bsdk indian Muslims bhi UAE ki team me hai aur USA Ki usko bhi anti national bologe. Khair education to tum me banned hai to kya hi bola jaye

[mefthanse @mefthanse2773]

@DehatiSajman @imadityapandeyy @Nher_who Chutiya aap ho unka ladka team ke liye khelta hai isliye cheer kar rhe the

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

During the Iranian Revolution, leftist students, communists, and Muslims were all united in overthrowing the Shah.

The leftists celebrated when Khomeini returned in 1979. They thought they defeated capitalism and imperialism. It didn’t last long.

Around 30,000 leftists who helped the Islamic regime consolidate power were soon executed. That’s where the term “useful idiot” comes from.

They served their purpose and were no longer needed. Muslims had always despised their progressive ideals and couldn’t wait to get rid of them.

One of the women celebrating in the picture was killed, the other fled the country for her life.

It’s bizarre that almost 50 years later, Western leftists are making the exact same mistake and allying with Muslims. They will have the same fate.

[Nate Friedman @NateFriedman97]

My documentary on the Islamification of Birmingham has been demonetized on YouTube after reaching 600,000 views. So here is the entire video on X.

In the video, I'm told that it's okay to strike your wife if she's disobeying you. I'm told that I would have to leave the grocery store and go to the city center in order to be able to find a white person. I'm told that all women in the UK who cheat should be executed.

Thank you to @elonmusk for commenting on this video and allowing this content to be on X. If it weren't for X I genuinely think the west would have reached the point of no return already.

[ANUPAM MISHRA @scribe9104]

“मैं भारत में पैदा हुआ और बड़ा हुआ लेकिन मेरा समर्थन हमेशा पाकिस्तान के लिए रहेगा और मैं कश्मीर को भारत से काटना चाहता हूँ”

“हम मुसलमान हैं हमारे लिए देश और पासपोर्ट का कोई मतलब नहीं, हमारे लिये सिर्फ़ मज़हब मायने रखता है”

एकदम यही बात उमर ख़ालिद और शर्जील इमाम कह रहे थे

ये भी पढ़ा-लिखा आदमी है, अपनी बात स्पष्ट तरीक़े से रख रहा है, बल्कि ये लोग अपनी बात चिल्ला-चिल्ला कर बता रहे हैं

पर अभी कुछ लोग आयेंगे और कहेंगे आपने इन्हें ग़लत समझा

[Nick Collins @nickcollins1953]

For four thousand years, the Indian subcontinent was the centre of world trade. Sumerian tablets record Indian ships reaching Mesopotamia in the third millennium BC. Rome ran a permanent trade deficit with India. By 1600, Surat was the richest port on earth.

Then, within a single lifetime, India lost its maritime supremacy almost entirely.

The conventional explanation is that Europe arrived with superior ships and weapons. It is a comforting story and it is largely wrong. The deeper cause was internal.

Indian commerce was extraordinarily sophisticated. Surat's leading merchant, the Jain financier Virji Vora, was reputedly the richest man in the world; the East India Company borrowed from him. Merchants of every religion and origin traded together because the system rested on two foundations: religious toleration, established by Akbar, and predictable, low-tariffs. Customs duties were around five per cent. Contracts were honoured. Trust was the real currency.

There was one structural weakness. In Venice, Amsterdam and London, the state and the merchant class shared an interest in trade and invested in it together. In Mughal India, the ruling elite was indifferent to commerce. Merchants financed the state; the state never encouraged merchants.

When Aurangzeb became hostile, merchants had no protection. Religious toleration was abandoned. Temples were destroyed, punitive taxes on non-Muslims reimposed, the Sikh Guru executed. Forty years of war followed. East India Company imports from India fell ninety per cent in seven years. Eight thousand merchants abandoned Surat in a single exodus.

They relocated, many of them to an insignificant island Britain had received as a royal wedding dowry, because it offered the security and toleration the Mughal state had destroyed. It also offered English Common Law. Within a generation Bombay was the commercial capital of India. The Wadia family built the Royal Navy's finest ships there. The Tata dynasty traces its origins to this migration.

Europe did not defeat Indian commerce. It inherited it, by providing the conditions Indian merchants needed and their own rulers had thrown away.

This is not an argument about colonialism. It is an argument about something more fundamental, and it is the thread running through all three of my books on maritime trade. The second ‘The Millennium Maritime Trade Revolution’ is subtitled ‘How Asia Lost Maritime Supremacy.’ It is hardly ever lost to a stronger rival but when a society stops valuing the openness, toleration and commercial purpose that made it great. Portugal did it. The Dutch Republic did it. Britain, in the 20th century, did it too.

The conditions of prosperity are always a choice. And they can be unmade by a single generation that comes to value something else more.

Link to the full Substack essay with sources is below.

[mefthanse @mefthanse2773]

@Rajesh_521 @narendramodi @POTUS @realDonaldTrump Karwade bhai