Megan Price

I believe in Jesus, family, friendship, love, kindness, bieber, lipstick and a good french manicure 🙃

[Lauren Conlin @conlin_lauren]

BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy’s defense is asking Judge William Sullivan to investigate “Juror Doe”...the lone holdout whose vote resulted in a mistrial.

The 9/18 motion seeks his confidential questionnaire, background-check results, records concerning an alleged 2021 prosecution and abuse-prevention order, cellphone metadata from deliberation days and a limited forensic examination of the phone allegedly carried into the jury room. The defense also wants Juror Doe questioned under oath about his voir dire answers, his Sept. 3 assurances and whether he used the phone or received outside information during deliberations.

The defense is also asking the court to question Juror No. 10 about what he allegedly observed concerning Juror Doe’s cellphone use during deliberations.

The defense requests that this motion be heard in open court on Sept. 29.

[Jennifer Coffindaffer @CoffindafferFBI]

Lindsay Clancy

The jurors speak out.

Wow!

Did she really say:

Excited?

And classic-

He couldn't get over the fact she murdered her children.

Many of us can't.

I am glad he stood strong.

#LindsayClancy
#LindsayClancyverdict

[Clean City Bird @cleancitybird]

The only time I will mention the Clancy trial on here (as someone who spent 3 years in defence including a female NGRI homicide case. and actually WATCHED every single day of the trial - taking full attendance notes as if I was on the jury/defence).

I hope to god that none of the people cheering on that 1 male juror EVER get called for jury duty.

The fact you refuse to, or just pretend you don’t, understand that 11 people had reasonable doubt, and that this one man did admit he had doubts but said he didn’t care, completely ignoring the law on reasonable doubt and the judges instructions is genuinely frightening.

This was not a “I genuinely believe this on the facts, the forensic and testimonial evidence, and the judges instructions as to the law as to what’s being asked of me” and they simply disagreed on verdict. That wouldn’t be an issue. This man told his fellow jurors that yes, he did actually see points of doubt, but he was going to ignore that entirely.

He should be held in contempt as this is jurors misconduct. And I hope to god none of you ever have to be judged by a juror like that.

Genuinely embarrassing that some people think someone not following the law of the principle of reasonable doubt during the process of their civic duty is “based” or something to admire. And more embarrassing still, that you speak on this with such confidence without knowing a single element of the case other than what you’ve seen from snippets from right wing podcast bros online.

You didn’t watch the case, you don’t understand what’s even being asked of the jury, you continue to ignore the actual background of any of the legal arguments, you refuse to acknowledge the constitutional right of presumption of innocence and fair trial, you play “hear no evil, see no evil” around the ‘admissions’ without acknowledging all of the not guilty pleas, you don’t understand why an NGRI defence was raised or the circumstances surrounding it, and you don’t even understand what’s happening legally, forensically, medically, psychologically. Whatsoever.

Honestly disappointing seeing seemingly smart people behave like that. Particularly people who claim to have discernment.

[Katlyn Chandler @Thekatchandler]

We all know if it were 11-1 guilty, the state would be fighting to have that juror replaced. They just want a mistrial so they get another chance. It shouldn’t matter what the split is. If ANY juror says they aren’t going to follow the law, they have no business being on a jury. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial

[Fox News @FoxNews]

NOW: Jury enters Day 7 of deliberations without a verdict in the Lindsay Clancy trial https://t.co/LOxqeS6QR2

[Kylie Jane Kremer @KylieJaneKremer]

19 days ago, I posted that after watching the Commonwealth’s case against Lindsay Clancy, I had serious reasonable doubt.

It got 4.4 MILLION views and 2,500+ comments. People absolutely lost their minds. I was called every name imaginable, accused of defending a child murderer and repeatedly told this was an “open-and-shut” case that would end in a quick conviction.

19 days later, I feel pretty damn vindicated.

Six days. 30+ hours of deliberations. TWO deadlocks. A Tuey-Rodriguez “dynamite” charge. And now an 11–1 jury fighting over reasonable doubt.

Whatever the ultimate verdict is, the idea that this was an obvious, open-and-shut case has been completely demolished.

My point was NEVER that Lindsay is innocent or that Patrick killed Cora, Dawson and Callan.

Lindsay pleaded NOT GUILTY. Massachusetts does not require her to admit she committed the murders simply because she raised lack of criminal responsibility. The Commonwealth still had to prove the charged crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. Only then does criminal responsibility become determinative.

People skipped right over that and treated her guilt as an established fact. It wasn’t. That was precisely what the jury was being asked to decide.

Three children were brutally killed. Of course we want someone held accountable. But emotion cannot substitute for evidence, tragedy does not lower the burden of proof and the presumption of innocence does not disappear because the allegations are horrific.

This investigation left serious questions unanswered and evidence uncollected, untested or unexplored. Lindsay was arrested roughly 21 hours after the 911 call while hospitalized in a coma.

And 19 days later, I STILL have the same question!!!

Why wasn’t EVERY possibility thoroughly investigated before investigators decided they knew what happened?

That includes Patrick Clancy, the only adult unharmed at the scene and the person telling investigators Lindsay did it.

That does NOT mean Patrick killed his children. It means he should have been thoroughly investigated too.

So after 4.4 million views, thousands of people telling me how stupid and wrong I was, and insisting this jury would convict almost immediately, yes, I stand by every word.

Six days, 30+ hours and two deadlocks later, reasonable doubt wasn’t some outrageous argument I invented on X. It is literally what has this jury still unable to reach unanimity.

Court starts in 5 minutes. According to Reddington, Judge Sullivan is expected to question the holdout juror, and Reddington is alleged to be filing an emergency motion seeking to have further proceedings conducted openly and on the record (below).

Whatever happens next, Cora, Dawson and Callan deserve justice.

But justice isn’t getting the verdict the internet decides based on half truths and TikTok’s.

Justice is following the law, respecting the presumption of innocence and forcing the government to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

That was my point 19 days ago.

And I stand by it even more strongly today.

[RealityBBQ #BB28 @rbbq]

Things You "Need To Know" - Preseason Part 4 #BB28

1. Move-In! Yesterday was Day 1
2. Cast Reveal: 14 newbies
3. 3 Reality TV Vets
- Rick Devins (Survivor 38/50) @DaltonRoss
- Dee Valladares (Survivor 45/50, The Challenge 41) @Realitytv__fan
- Angela Murray (BB26, TAR38) @sharontharp
4. Dee was not officially announced - this will happen on BB Unlocked

[Big Brother Network #BB28 @bigbrothernet]

The game is already underway and we'll be catching up soon with Thursday's season premiere episode, Unlocked on Friday, and Feeds right after Unlocked. It'll be here soon!

https://t.co/wJ5nDUVOK1

#BB28 #bigbrother

[BBUS2027 News @BBUSNews]

Tomorrow night! #BB28

[Megan Price @megsimms]

@Mrsmoby100 @CoffindafferFBI You are very clearly extremely unwell.

[Big Brother Network #BB28 @bigbrothernet]

One day closer to the new season of Big Brother 28! The countdown continues...

#BB28 #bigbrother

[Megan Price @megsimms]

@Courtneii_Jade @BrianEntin I know right! Absolutely blows my mind that she would risk her career and livelihood to do that.. unless she just thought she was too untouchable but Alex should have taught her that nobody was truly above the law 🤔

[Megan Price @megsimms]

@Courtneii_Jade @BrianEntin Well not the case, the case has been built by LE - but the conviction, yes.

[Megan Price @megsimms]

@courtney_c_21 @BrianEntin Yes, the only thing that they may not be able to use again are his financial crimes (depending on judge ruling)

[Megan Price @megsimms]

@Derk1587 @BrianEntin Dumb and extremely expensive 🥴

[Brian Entin @BrianEntin]

South Carolina Supreme Court overturns Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions and orders a new trial in the 2021 killing of his wife and son.

[Brian Entin @BrianEntin]

Regardless of how you feel about Alex Murdaugh -- the court clerk simply cannot tell jurors
"watch his body language"
"don't be fooled"
"this shouldn't take us long"

[Big Brother Network #BB28 @bigbrothernet]

Getting ready! #BB28
https://t.co/gXY0VKhb18

[Megan Price @megsimms]

@loren_yearwood @JLRINVESTIGATES Disturbing thing to say lol

[Megan Price @megsimms]

@popflodmv @MattWallace888 @grok Definitely not that song lol. I didn’t hear a song at all, but it wasn’t she’s my kind of crazy for sure