Adam Mehes

Litigation @X. Husband and father of 3.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Interesting. Grok 4.7 is performing fairly well for a smallish model.

[Donald Trump Jr. @DonaldJTrumpJr]

As I’ve said, Woke AI will do far more damage than the entirety of woke media, woke education, woke corporate, and every other woke institution combined.
People will be manipulated, propagandized and transformed and they won’t even know it’s happening.
Absolute insanity.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Grok #1 in law

[Harmeet K. Dhillon @HarmeetKDhillon]

DOJ FILES ITS FIRST Constitutional challenge in an AI case, challenging state regulations on AI. We join @xai’s landmark suit, and stand against woke DEI standards being imposed by Colorado. Team effort with @DOJCivil ! Let’s go!!!!

[Katie Miller @KatieMiller]

The Justice Department just told French law enforcement authorities it wouldn’t facilitate their efforts to investigate @X.

@TheJusticeDept accused France of abusing its criminal justice system to target an American company and censor free speech — in clear violation of the First Amendment.

“This investigation seeks to use the criminal legal system in France to regulate a public square for the free expression of ideas and opinions in a manner contrary to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.”

[Katie Miller @KatieMiller]

Today, @xAI sued Colorado to stop a new law (SB24-205) that would force Grok to promote the state’s ideological views on various matters, racial justice in particular.

Colorado wants to force Grok to follow its views on equity and race, instead of being maximally truth-seeking.

Grok answers to evidence, not woke leftist government regulations.

https://t.co/SnnIP8HUvH

[Riley Gaines @Riley_Gaines_]

OpenAI is programmed to be a progressive echo chamber. Tread carefully.
https://t.co/XdACOLHOit

[Katie Miller @KatieMiller]

Canadian trans shooter was flagged via internal systems at Open AI for writings about real-world violence, including gun violence.

Over a dozen Open AI employees debated telling law enforcement.

OpenAI leaders decided not to inform authorities about a potential mass murder.

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🚨 General Mike Flynn's backing Elon’s warning:

If Grok doesn’t win the AI race, you can pretty much welcome your surveillance state AI overlords.

The real political battle may be way beyond parties.

Source: @GenFlynn, @elonmusk, @grok

[Aakash Gupta @aakashgupta]

France is setting up for a redux of the Pavel Durov boondoggle.

Today they raided X’s Paris office with Europol, summoned Elon Musk and former CEO Linda Yaccarino for questioning, and then the prosecutor’s office posted about it on X before announcing they were leaving the platform entirely. Let me explain why this is political theater dressed up as law enforcement.

The entire investigation traces back to a single French lawmaker, Eric Bothorel, who filed a complaint in January 2025 about “biased algorithms.” Thirteen months later, French police show up to raid a local office staffed by marketing and sales employees who have zero access to algorithm code or AI training data. Bothorel celebrated on X that his complaint was “yielding results.” The prosecutor’s office then quit the platform in a public statement redirecting followers to LinkedIn and Instagram. That’s a prosecuting authority turning a criminal investigation into a branding moment.

The probe started as an algorithm manipulation complaint. Then it expanded to include a Grok-generated Holocaust denial post that the chatbot itself corrected and deleted. Then it expanded again to include deepfake concerns that every AI image tool on earth is grappling with right now. The scope keeps widening because the original complaint was too thin to sustain a raid on its own. Every few months a new charge gets stapled to the investigation to keep it alive and keep it in the press.

Think about what the summons actually accomplish. Musk lives in Texas. Yaccarino stepped down in July 2025. The summons are mandatory under French law but unenforceable against people outside France. They exist to generate headlines. Zero procedural value.

France has well-established mutual legal assistance treaties with the United States. If French prosecutors wanted evidence from X’s servers, they could submit formal requests through diplomatic channels the way every other country does daily. X’s statement points this out directly. Instead, France raided a local office where employees have no access to the systems under investigation. The raid cannot produce the evidence the probe claims to need. Which means the raid was never about evidence.

This is the Durov playbook. French prosecutors arrested the Telegram founder in 2024 under similar cybercrime authority, generated massive international coverage, and used the arrest to assert jurisdiction over an American-adjacent tech platform. The pattern is identical. Use a cybercrime investigation to create a spectacle, pressure US executives, and position France as Europe’s tech enforcement leader.

The EU fined X €120 million in December and immediately publicized the penalty. The European Commission opened a Grok investigation in January and held a press conference. Now French prosecutors raid an office and announce it on the very platform they claim to be investigating. Every enforcement action against X in Europe gets a media strategy before it gets a legal brief.

X operates in 200+ countries. Every one of those countries has content laws. The standard process everywhere is flag content, request removal, escalate through treaties if noncompliant. France skipped all of that and went straight to a physical raid on employees who can’t change a single line of code.

The message is clear. This is leverage against Musk personally, not a good-faith pursuit of justice against the platform. And if Durov is any precedent, the legal outcome will be anticlimactic compared to the spectacle.

[SpaceXAI @SpaceXAI]

One Team 🚀
https://t.co/8RWbk5jQIQ

[SpaceX @SpaceX]

SpaceX has acquired xAI, forming one of the most ambitious, vertically integrated innovation engines on (and off) Earth → https://t.co/3ODfcYnqfg

[X Freeze @XFreeze]

You can’t make this up

The EU slapped 𝕏 with a €45,000,000 fine because they think Europeans are too stupid to realize a cartoon duck isn’t a real person 🦆 🤡

This is the Brussels "Business Model":
Step 1: Invent a fake problem
Step 2: Target & Extort an American company
Step 3: Declare democracy “saved”

Brussels is so terrified of free speech that they’ve resorted to suing cartoons
They call it "fighting disinformation"

Everyone else calls it a mental health crisis for bureaucrats 🇪🇺

[Adam Mehes @mehes3]

@RedWaveCrewHP 0.0166667 divided by 0.0166667 divided by 0.0166667

[Sawyer Merritt @SawyerMerritt]

The lawsuit between Elon Musk and OpenAI is surfacing some pretty interesting evidence:

OpenAI's Greg Brockman: "It'd be wrong to steal the non-profit from him. to convert to a b-corp without him. that'd be pretty morally bankrupt. and he's really not an idiot." Days later, Brockman further wrote under the heading "our plan" that "it would be nice to be making the billions" and explained that "we've been thinking that maybe we should flip to a for profit."

Earlier Greg said: "Cannot say that we are committed to the non-profit. don't want to say that we're committed. if three months later we're doing b-corp then it was a lie. Not feeling so great about all of this. The true answer is that we want [Musk] out. Can't see us turning this into a for-profit without a very nasty fight. I'm just thinking about the office and we're in the office. and his story will correctly be that we weren't honest with him in the end about still wanting to do the for profit just without him."

[vittorio @IterIntellectus]

leftism is a memetic parasite optimized for host sterilization. every core tenet leads to the same endpoint: you don’t reproduce

equality - no hierarchy means no selection for excellence, no reason to strive, no family formation incentive.
sexual liberation - commodified dopamine hits replacing pair bonding. celebrate barrenness as “freedom”
identity ideology - fragment the self into a thousand genders, none of which have (or can have) children.
destroy the nuclear family - the one structure that actually transmits values and creates future humans.
delay reproduction for career - until the eggs are dead and the window is closed.

follow the tenets fully and you disappear.
40% fertility vs 71% is extinction math, 3 generations of true believers and the bloodline end

but the thing about death cults is that the successful ones adapt. if your ideology sterilizes its hosts, you cant spread through inheritance and you have to spread through infection.
and you cant infect adults since their immune system is developed, their priors are set.
you need children.
you need them young, before their parents can transmit their values and before the immune system forms.

this is why they need the schools and media (not want, need). it’s the only reproduction strategy available.
this is why parents aren’t told when their child changes pronouns. why therapists are legally required to “affirm” and legally prohibited from informing. why homeschooling is treated as extremism and investigated like abuse. why “parental rights” became a far-right dogwhistle. why every disney movie now features parents as the villains and the institution as the liberator. why family is depicted as oppression and escape from family as heroism. why they lowered the age of medical consent. why they want your kids online, unsupervised, as early as possible.

the parasite can’t reproduce, it can only recruit. and recruitment requires access to hosts before they’re immunized.

every leftist memeplex that didn’t prioritize youth capture already went extinct. what you’re seeing is survivorship bias. the ones that remain are the ones that figured out how to parasitize the reproductive capacity of their outgroup.

you’re watching natural selection for memetic parasitism in real time.
and they need your kids to survive

[zerohedge @zerohedge]

Judge Denies Apple, OpenAI Bid To Dismiss Elon Musk's Antitrust Lawsuit https://t.co/9W1Ydjg64a

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

Thank you @elonmusk

[S.E. Robinson, Jr. @SERobinsonJr]

xAI NEWS: xAI filed a lawsuit yesterday in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California accusing OpenAI of systematically poaching former xAI employees, including engineers Xuechen Li, Jimmy Fraiture, and a redacted ex-executive (possibly ex-CFO Mike Liberatore), to steal trade secrets on Grok’s source code, business plans, and data center operations.

Per the Lawsuit: The desire to win the artificial intelligence race has driven OpenAI to cross the line of fair play. OpenAI violated California and federal law by inducing former xAI employees, including Xuechen Li, Jimmy Fraiture, and a senior finance executive, to steal and share xAI’s trade secrets. By hook or by crook, OpenAI clearly will do anything when threatened by a better innovator, including plundering and misappropriating the technical advancements, source code, and business plans of xAI.

The complaint cites a July email from xAI lawyer Alex Spiro to the redacted ex-executive alleging confidentiality breaches. Spiro was met with a one line reply: "suck my dick."

Things are getting real folks!