@ritalichter Женщины дома с детьми сидят! А вообще вроде известно, что мужчины на большее готовы ради карьерных успехов (видимо отчасти из-за конкуренции друг с другом), вот и мотаются туда-сюда и работают больше
# on technical accessibility
One interesting observation I think back to often:
- when I first published the micrograd repo, it got some traction on GitHub but then somewhat stagnated and it didn't seem that people cared much.
- then I made the video building it from scratch, and the repo immediately went through hockey stick growth and became a verty often cited reference for people learning backpropagation.
This was interesting because the micrograd code itself didn't change at all and it was up on GitHub for many months before, stagnating. The code made sense to me (because I wrote it), it was only ~200 lines of code, it was extensively commented in the .py files and in the Readme, so I thought surely it was clear and/or self-explanatory. I was very happy with myself about how minimal the code was for explaining backprop - it strips away a ton of complexity and just gets to the very heart of an autograd engine on one page of code. But others didn't seem to think so, so I just kind of brushed it off and moved on.
Except it turned out that what stood in its way was "just" a matter of accessibility. When I made the video that built it and walked through it, it suddenly almost 100X'd the overall interest and engagement with that exact same piece of code. Not only from beginners in the field who needed the full intro and explanation, but even from more technical/expert friends, who I think could have understood it if they looked at it long enough, but were deterred by a barrier to entry.
I think as technical people we have a strong bias to put up code or papers or the final thing and feel like things are mostly self-explanatory. It's there, and also it's commented, there is a Readme, so all is well, and if people don't engage then it's just because the thing is not good enough. But the reality is that there is still a large barrier to engage with your thing (even for other experts who might not feel like spending time/effort!), and you might be leaving somewhere 10-100X of the potential of that exact same piece of work on the table just because you haven't made it sufficiently accessible.
TLDR: Step 1 build the thing. Step 2 build the ramp. 📈
Some voice in your head will tell you that this is not necessary, but it is wrong.
Прочитал книгу American Kingpin про основателя Silk road, сайта в анонимном инт��рнете, где продавались наркота и прочее. Невероятная история, человеку дали два пожизненных по сути за создание сайта
I was arrested at the age of 29 and today I turn 39. I’ve lost my 30s to prison.
During that time, I’ve done my best to learn from my mistakes, better myself, and help others do the same.
I hope someday I can make amends as a free man as well.
@ritalichter Ныть не надо, но видел много примеров поведения "дальше-ближе" у девушек, которое усугубляет ситуацию. Парни обычно сразу нахер посылают. Вот это больше похоже на "emotional rape" (но всё ещё нет), чем онлайн общение с чатгпт
Если можно найти жену с помощью ChatGPT, может мне удастся наконец найти хорошего Flutter разработчика с помощью ChatGPT и онлайн дейтинг (то есть фриланс) платформ типа upwork?
GPT-3 не помнил переписку. В первые 5 сообщений диалог ещё шел, затем повторялись вопросы, по которым GPT уже получал инфу и это выставляло “меня” рыбкой Дори-долбоклюйкой. Пришлось зашурупить скрипт, чтобы учитывались предыдущие сообщения в промпте. Далее GPT отвечал с памятью
Блет вот платишь сервису двадцатку в месяц за премиумные фичи, а он тебя нахер просто ��осылает. Окей гугл где опенсорсные модели без ограничений, регистрации и смс