Received a call from a French-CBC reporter this week.
Reporter: “I’ve been told that we’re no longer allowed to speak with you, and La Presse is encouraging us to distance ourselves from you because of what you wrote about media subsidies. Is that true?”
Me: “Quite possibly. La Presse and Radio-Canada are like peas and carrots: when one cancels you, the other tends to follow. It’s unfortunate—especially since I wholeheartedly support public broadcasting.”
When you listen to the news—any news—pay close attention to the experts they invite and what they say; more and more are being canceled by the public broadcaster just because we actually say what we think.
My sincere thanks to the courageous reporter who had the guts to call me and explain what was going on.
🎭The purest hypocrisy: publicly funded outlets that brand themselves as essential sources of “information” are now training their own staff to ghost experts who simply point out the conflicts in media subsidies…
🤹♀️They demand transparency from everyone else while enforcing opacity and cancelling anyone who disrupts the narrative. That’s not journalism, that’s curated indoctrination dressed up as news.🎪
@tosajohn@TheoFleury14 Guess you're living well with your blinders on. I'm a senior with a lot more brainpower than you it seems, oh sorry I forgot, all the Lib voters think with the one braincell.
Can one liberal person, give me a rational explanation for 30 year gag orders on committee members?
These committees are set up, in large part so that transparency is a priority. Accountability is maintained.
Just one solid argument against having cameras and discourse shut off to the public. (In this specific case of absurd spending, once again, on a project that amounted to millions in lost tax payer money, to add to the billions already)
Useful idiots... you have zero idea what you voted for. Enjoy the decline and please keep cheering along the way into full blown communism...