OA journal w/o APC. Open Peer Review, transparent editorial process. Publishes everything Meta in Psy: meta-science, meta-analysis, file-drawers, methods...
Join our conference on Open Science and Reproducibility. Keynote by @lakens and @annemscheel, with @nulliusverbapod live on stage at the record shop / “folkölscafé” (bar) Mono. Does the fake code make you cringe? Then you will love the replication games! URL below.
Interested in replication research? Consider writing a commentary for the next special issue in @Meta_Psy, which will publish critiques of the article "Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size"! (full call text in image)
@Luce10101 just had her workshop on computational reproducibility at #SIPS2023. Amazing to see how many people were interested in our way of doing repro checks!
Published at Meta Psychology:
"We are all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers: Successful replication and extension of Svenson (1981)"
The result of a fun workshop I ran with the wonderful Linköping Sweden JDM team.
More details:
👇🧵
Your occasional reminder that the peer review process at Meta-Psychology @Meta_Psy is not only the most transparent in the field, it is also the most constructive and civilised.
(COI disclosure: I am a member of the Advisory Board and Reproducibility Team at this journal.)
Academic journals have responded to the replicability crisis by promoting open science, including through awarding badges, for example for providing open access to data. How well do these badges work? That’s what we tried to find out! https://t.co/nhYmjOkiR6
🧵1/
Pretty happy to be able to update this with an "Out now in @Meta_Psy" https://t.co/i8qDEZJhXL
I've been worried about measurement reliability issues for a while. But, this reliability heterogeneity thing, it's got me more worried. Especially when we ignore it...
@ceptional@amdelvaz@FBpsy@DP_JEDI The metadata and cross referencing of it is a problem that remains to be resolved. All online journals can publish supplementary materials with essential zero extra cost so hosting content isn’t the issue
TIL that for a few hundred dollars you can buy yourself authorship of a peer-reviewed article. There are dozens to choose from. What not buy this as a gift for your parent, significant other, retiring colleague, or cat? https://t.co/vQ36L6vc1y
Hey native speaker clinical psych tweeps: I could need some help.
There is a copy editor (CE) who loves rewriting (final) papers in their entirety, & I've once again encountered that person. For 4 of these edits I'm really not sure & want to understand my mistakes better. 1/7
“Four Failures to Demonstrate that Scarcity Magnifies Preference for Familiarity” by @_stephanoplis is now published in @Meta_Psy! https://t.co/PX6dSJBRMG
Just remembered that time I tried to 'help' @StuartJRitchie come up with a title for his book (before it was called Science Fictions).
But instead I kept thinking of silly idioms about the replication crisis hitting specific fields.