Métanoïa

IT engineer / ex-Cisco Internetworking Expert) / Computer image treatment specialist (CGI/compositing) / Actively working on a "Simulation Model" of Reality...

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@adnm_live Palentir? Ou PalAntir?

https://t.co/DtbWCWt6ZP

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@FrantzArnaldy @adnm_live Le livre d'Enoch n'a jamais, à ma connaissance, été "interdit". Il a d'ailleurs toujours fait partie de la Bible en Ethiopie...

Les Chrétiens des premiers siècles se sont prononcés, par habitude, pour certains livres plutôt que d'autres. Le Canon est né de ce plébiscite...

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory Perhaps my simulation model is wrong!

All I know is that the results I'm getting are consistent with what physics predicts.

But my model really is so simple. It's just a neural network where each node is defined by 7 angles and 3 scalars. And each link is 4 angles + 1 scalar...

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory I basically built a simulation model around relativity (SR and GR).

For instance, in my simulation model, time dilation automatically causes length (distances) contraction: those are the two sides of the very same coin.

Time Dilation = smaller angle difference = smaller dist.

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory The spacetime interval formula uses c*t to ensure dimensional consistency. Physicists are used to convert time into units of distance.

I just did the opposite: I converted distances into units of time. And I measure time as an angle value.

For a simulation, this helps a lot!

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory Fortunately, it does 😊

Along with SR, GR, QM... It checks all the currently known physics (not necessarily the interpretations we've made from our observations).

It's basically an enhanced version of Wolfram's hypergraphs...

Anyway, thanks for reminding me how dumb I am 😄

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory To be perfectly honest, the simulation model I am working on doesn't rely on Minkowski's space/metric.

But as a "dumbass" A.I. & network engineer, I must be wrong. Obviously! Hopefully, some smart/enlightened physicists like you will help me see all my mistakes, eventually...

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory Correct! Alpha isn't an actual geometrical angle. Yet it helps a lot...

Many things starts to make sense when you simply use angles as physical units along with spherical coordinates instead of cartesian.

I think we made a big mistake by denying the physicality of angles/cycles

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory Although I never objected to that, I think you should "associate" speed to an angle... Let's name that angle "alpha".

Sin (alpha) = speed (v/c)
Cos (alpha) = 1/gamma (A.K.A. the Lorentz factor).

Do you start to get where I'm going?

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory Why not?

What are the advantages of assigning a dimension to angles?

Mostly, the additional dimensionality carries a lot more information. Consider frequency 𝑓 and angular velocity 𝜔. In the SI system both have the same dimension, namely 1/time. Don't you see the issue?

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory Indeed! But your objection was: "if you define distance and time as angles, what is the unit of speed".

I gave you the answer: speed is nothing but a dimensionless fraction of c! AKA speed's "natural unit".

If you knew this, why did you object my argument?

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory OK! But why should we keep rad/cycles along with meters and seconds if we can express m and s as CYCLES???

Again, the current definition of 1 second, using the CAESIUM standard, dates back from 1967. That is 5 years after the publishing date of the aforementioned article...

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory "Physicists ALREADY express *SPEED* as a fraction of c. They are called natural units." Thank you!

Sounds like you've learned something today after all...

Do you and I agree about the fact using radians and cycles as actual (primary?) physical units makes sense after all?

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory I never claimed we should express "time as a fraction of c". How exactly could "time" be a fraction of a speed?

My point was that ANGLES shouldn't be considered "dimensionless".

Did you read this paper? Do you think it was written by a "dumbass"?

https://t.co/s0RZuqk3l5

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory I certainly am as "retarded" as the author of this paper, published in the "JOURNAL OF RESEARCH of the National Bureau of Standards-B. Mathematics and Mathematical Physics"

We both share the same concerns and the same conclusions...

https://t.co/s0RZuqk3l5

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory I never said you can!

You measure distance and time as angles. Therefore speed becomes "dimensionless"! Where is the issue with that?

Speed can (and should) be expressed as a fraction of "c". Now, wouldn't it be convenient to calculate the Lorentz factor?

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory As per my engineering degree, I am more familiar with E&M, thermodynamics, optics, etc.

Yet I feel comfortable with the (basics) of QM and relativity... So long you don't ask me to teach these ;)

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory https://t.co/ackleSBSOU

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory Good question! If we switch to "angles as a measure", speed becomes a "dimensionless" portion of "c" -- the speed of light.

We could perfectly normalize "c" to the value "1" and express any speed as a fraction of "c", now can't we?

You'd be surprised how this simplifies physics

[Métanoïa @metanoia7217]

@GiovanniSagredo @Its_BS @PhysInHistory @GiovanniSagredo My turn to recommend you to LEARN a little bit more! Because in your constant urge to insult everyone, you clearly overlook @Its_BS and my points.

FYI, mathematicians and physicists over the world share the very same concern as I do...

https://t.co/ackleSBSOU