mfzooot

hyperliquid

[⚡Game*Spark⚡ @gamespark]

生地選びから裁断・裁縫までできちゃう本格派ドレスクラフトシム『Dressmaker』Steamにてリリース！ウィッシュリスト40万件超の注目作
https://t.co/1b7bK1Uf2V

依頼品を納品するのみならず自由にデザインしたドレスを店頭に並べて販売することもできます。

[Anthropic @AnthropicAI]

We're publishing our most detailed threat intelligence report to date.

It covers how people tried to misuse Claude—for cyberattacks, influence operations, surveillance, biology, and building weapons—and how we found and stopped them.

We disrupted every operation in the report, and used the lessons from them to strengthen our safeguards. Where appropriate, we also shared what we found with authorities and other AI companies.

These cases are not typical: we’re highlighting some of the most sophisticated misuse we’ve seen. But they’re especially important to discuss, because they show us where AI misuse is headed, where our safeguards work, and where they need to improve.

We’re publishing this report so others can spot the same activity on their own platforms, and so we can give the public a clearer view of how emerging threats develop.

Read the report: https://t.co/0EJUnYEgfz

[Anthropic @AnthropicAI]

Anthropic’s Economics team is sharing a new model of how AI might affect economic growth, jobs, wages, and more by 2030.

Explore the scenarios, tell us what you think will happen, and see how your answers compare to more than 10,000 Americans. https://t.co/AvQlEZNxR0

[Reads with Ravi @readswithravi]

Computer scientist Sara Hooker on underestimating difficulty:

[OSF @osf_rekt]

i'm not going to trade this weekend and hold my boner oh no sisyphus cto'd fatcoin oh no vlad and amc ceo were chatting that means my cinema must be up oh wait no it's not another coin called meme is up oh no boner is lower i better sell because everything is just hot potatoes ill just top blast more pons and chill, might as well rotate all my stonk to it as well as robinhood is the leader oh no i woke up and pons is down 25% wtf let me stop out here it has too much competition hahaha that meme amc coin is down 90% oh fuck now it's up 300% because vlad followed it oh what's the brew coin omg this is binance's answer to pons im gonna go all in nothing can vamp this oh fuck why is boner up 150% oh coz hims ceo followed it oh fuck now my brew coin is down wait i swear i had $100k on friday why do i only have $7300 left worth of something called par, wait i swear i bough pair or was it pare or pear where has all my money gone fuck this shit

[mfzooot @mfzooot]

@MEADGod 🅿️🅿️🅿️🅿️🅿️🅿️

[mfzooot @mfzooot]

@MEADGod we pushin????

[Ishita @IshitaaPandey]

people don't realise how important it is to have ambitious friends in life.

[gab @apebender]

cohort of giga brain builders born in defi summer 2020 meets cohort of giga retard traders born in 2024 who held a picture of a dog from six figs to multi-billions

no ceilings

[mfzooot @mfzooot]

@trading_axe @I4NFTS pls

[mfzooot @mfzooot]

@trading_axe @I4NFTS my goat what are you doing

[Digi @digiii]

you must believe you are special and then go so hard, for so long, with such violent refusal to accept any other ending, that reality itself starts running out of ways to tell you no. you must wage a war daily against the ordinary outcome, until the belief you invented out of nothing in a room by yourself has been hammered into the world so many times that it stops being a claim and becomes reality.

[shaunda devens @shaundadevens]

https://t.co/oy3IXREaWd

[Hyperliquid Policy Center @HyperliquidPC]

https://t.co/EHMbwTf09I

[Hyperliquid Policy Center @HyperliquidPC]

Hyperliquid.

[Jesús Fernández-Villaverde @JesusFerna7026]

Last week I posted a new paper with Patrick Norrick: “Terra Incognita: The Economics of a Shrinking World.”

We chose the title deliberately. No society in history has experienced the fertility levels now seen in South Korea, China, Thailand, Colombia, Chile, and many other countries. Our knowledge of the causes (and of the economic consequences) remains far more limited than most public discussion acknowledges. Much of what we write is, at best, educated conjecture.

The paper also struggles against a space limit. We wrote 20,000 words, far from the 250,000 or so we would need to address some issues in more detail (if I had the time and resources to hide away for a year, I could do that, but not now). That means some ideas are only sketched.

Nonetheless, we emphasize several important points.

First, fertility has fallen very fast everywhere: rich and poor countries, east and west, north and south, conservative and liberal societies, religious and non-religious societies (with the exception of the Jewish population of Israel; fertility has also collapsed among the Muslim population within the pre-1967 borders), you name it. Even in sub-Saharan Africa we see fast and unprecedented drops in fertility (alas, from a high initial level).

Second, and this is really interesting, the fertility collapse has been concentrated in poor and lower-middle-income countries much more than in rich countries. By now, income per capita and fertility are positively correlated within OECD countries. We conjecture this will hold globally in a few decades.

Third, and related to the second point, the fertility collapse has been concentrated among poor and lower-middle-income women within countries. In countries such as the U.S., the rich and highly educated now have more children than the poor and less educated.

Fourth, we document why we do not understand the data from the U.N. World Population Prospects. See, for example, Tables A.1 and A.2.

Fifth, we explain why some proposed mechanisms struggle when confronted with the data.

A more subtle point is at work here. Many commentators do not seem to understand the difference between proximate causes and ultimate causes. Yes, births might have gone down because fewer women are in long-run relationships. That is the proximate cause. But you need to explain why fewer women are in long-run relationships (the ultimate cause), and saying that they spend more years in school, to take one example, does not get us very far. Why do they spend more years in school? Once you start down the whole chain of reasoning, things become much harder than they seem.

The paper can be found here:

https://t.co/VrCHr0lBPa

Comments always welcome!

[mfzooot @mfzooot]

@Blonskr 了不起的工作

[Blonskr @Blonskr]

TapeOut 链上矿机体系 官方示例 的征求意见稿

TapeOut 链上矿机体系的官方示例即将上线。在正式上链之前，我想先把全部规则、推导过程公开出来和大家分享。另外呢，这是征求意见稿，不是最终结论，同时核心算法我找了奥数大奖得主帮助我调整。所以估计至少还需要1-2天时间才能正式上线，请大家畅所欲言，坦诚沟通。

一、一种新的挖矿规则 PoD：Proof of Design
比特币矿机是比谁的机器好。TapeOut 的链上矿机是比谁电路设计的好。

二、代币详情
代币产出和规则设计与BTC保持基本一致，总代币数量 21,000,000 枚，8 位小数，初始产出 8,333,333 最小单位/秒 ≈ 7,200 枚/天（整数运算，精确值 7,199.9997），每 210,000 × 600 秒（3.995 年）减半。实际流通量会低于硬顶：某个池当期没有任何算力时，那部分产出不铸造、永久放弃，不进任何人口袋。代币合约不可升级、无 owner、无白名单、无私募、无预挖、无团队预留。我也没有代币，我唯一收入是代币在DEX交易时，收取0.2%的交易税，这个也可以后面探讨利弊，也没最终确定。

我需要说清楚的是：能铸币的是矿池合约，而它初始阶段暂时是UUPS可升级代理。在调用 seal() 之前，我是 owner ，在系统上线一周左右并确认系统平稳挖矿运行之后，我会放弃所有权力，如果有bug我会改。

三、只有这两台处理器，可以参与本次挖矿
处理器：
Behemoth（Blonskr No1）0x1F5Cb4aeaE1807Bf60c3b9C0D8aDBCC14e91f12C
TapeOut0xb1024b89886B9a34Aa4ff5F31C411D708b20a14C

四、处理器 挖矿系数 P：Behemoth = 6，TapeOut = 1
我知道这里会有人有不同意见，但请先听我说完我的推到和思考过程。首先从道理上讲，mint了Behemoth晶体管的，是真正最早的第一批支持者，我们应该给予尊重。其次，我们一起在数学上推导一下：挖矿的真实成本 = 烧掉的晶体管价格。例如：同一个 62 门的加法器，在 Behemoth 上造要 62 × 0.01 = 0.62 BNB，在 TapeOut 上造要 62 × 0.00165 = 0.102 BNB，贵 6.06 倍。所以系数取 6，两边每花 1 BNB 买到的算力才相等。
交叉验证：Behemoth 总市值 100,000 × 0.01 = 1,000 BNB（37.7%），TapeOut 1,000,000 × 0.00165 = 1,650 BNB（62.3%）；P=6 时 Behemoth 占矿池 600,000/1,600,000 = 37.5%。两个数字重合，当 P 正比于价格时，矿池占比就等于市值占比。一级 mintPrice 两台都是 0.0005，不能用来定 P（会得出 P≈1，对只有十分之一供应的最早第一批支持者们mint的 Behemoth 极不公平）。
所以别把“按市场算的”当成客观。我目前倾向维持 6，但这条最想听大家的意见，也没有最终确定。

五、算力公式
我这个部分我写了一个，但是我觉得很不满意，我觉得需要找帮手，今天通过父母的关系找到了我们这里著名ai大学的一个奥数大奖天才来帮我对这个算法做优化，当然，人家还没确定就一定帮我呢。所以这里需要等我1天。

六、我自己拿多少：零预挖、零团队份额、零锁仓额度。上线时没有任何人持有代币，包括我自己，全部 2,100 万枚只能通过挖矿产出。

七、上线前会做安全审计，报告和代码会一并公开。

八、想听你们的意见
1. P = 6 合理吗？ 我倾向维持。
2. 0.2% 交易税你们能接受吗？ 因为项目要运营支持，我也想赚点稳稳当当的合理的钱，而且我的确没有任何代币。提醒一句：有交易税的代币会被一部分 CEX、借贷协议，这个代价比 0.2% 本身大得多。

好了，有意见直接回复，好的建议我会直接进最终版本。

[Owen Yang @OwenYang888]

What can you actually do with the transistors you buy?
I put together a rough walkthrough below. You can buy some transistors, use them to build a tapeout
https://t.co/VXP7t5Awl8
And at the end of video I also included a very small miner example based on what a PoW-style reward model could look like.

Right now, @Blonskr seems to be planning for tapeouts themselves to be used for mining.

My guess is that miners would have to be built using Tapeout chips, then those chips would actually do the mining, and the token could only be earned through mining.

Since everyone’s compute is limited, the amount of tokens any single person can mine should naturally stay pretty small. Some of the “beasts” bought by the community have already reached around a $3M market cap, so I’d assume an official mined token probably wouldn’t be valued too cheaply either.

The other interesting part is that every time someone builds a tapeout, it consumes transistors.

So if more and more people start making tapeouts, both the finished tapeouts and the transistors needed to make them become scarce at the same time.

There are already quite a few interesting directions starting to emerge here. Really curious to see how the reward mechanism develops from here.

[Blonskr @Blonskr]

我在 BNB Chain 上做了历史上第一个真实的链上 4位处理器

一个 Token,就是一颗晶体管。
无数颗晶体管连起来，就是一个电路。
无数个电路连起来，就是一台真正的处理器。

2251 个全部由与非门和触发器组成的处理器，逐周期验证过。规格对标 1971 年的 Intel 4004。
它刚刚跑完了斐波那契:1、1、2、3、5、8、13。

它按 BNB Chain 的出块跳动——0.45 秒一拍，目前约等于2.22 Hz。可能这是全宇宙最慢的 CPU。但这是我的一小步，但，是 @BNBCHAIN 的一大步。未来是星辰大海啊！

全球唯一一台没有人能拔掉电源的处理器。我给他取名叫：巨兽 Behemoth

下周，我会发布完整协议发出来。让任何人可以使用这个协议创建自己的真实链上处理器，并且可以互相调用。像拼乐高一样，造出更高规格的链上CPU。
@youyou5202 @web4miko @0xsandy1913 @Cryptowushi @colinwu @heyibinance @cz_binance @BNBCHAINZH