Randomname

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@kirk_bowman @TheTomEstes Bill Kristol and Liz Cheney are "lifelong republicans" too if you want to make an argument do be disingenuous

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@LawyerInMO @SpeakerTimJones That law is Federally unconstitutional

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@Barkley333 @harrisonjlang If the eighth circut says it will it will be

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@Hogsfan1986 @kyleraccio You understand that you will go to hell if you don't vote for the 7-1 map right?

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@minerjpb @jeremycady Yes? a minority of voters shoudn't have veto over the legislature

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@midwestgoober @realPrestonHill The democrats are the ones who brought the suit against the new map in the first place

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@celeste43_ @ConorMartinMO The original order was overturned by a federal court

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@Snarfalarf @Father_McCarthy @Soupycloth /2 to make it so that there could be nonviolent way to resolve it, but that relied on all parties believing there were being treated fairly. This was only arguably possible then when society was more homogenous and as society diversified it makes it impossible

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@Snarfalarf @Father_McCarthy @Soupycloth What I'm arguing is that everthing is subjective, ultimately there must be someone somewhere who's subjective interpretation is the final say, traditionally this has been whoever can force there interpretation on everyone else. In the Constitution an attempt was made/1

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@Snarfalarf @Father_McCarthy @Soupycloth then good. Relying on it isn't viable to resolve issues today, even if the founding fathers were perfect. The fact that they're not means that were always going to be contradictions in there thinking.

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@Snarfalarf @Father_McCarthy @Soupycloth I'm saying there is contradiction yes, I have no idea what was in Alexander Hamilton's head neither do you, in fact I find it disingenuous to try and argue the founding fathers intentions, we are so far removed from 18th century WASP society that trying is does more harm/1

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@traaademark @FedMarrux @fpost729 @ThePoliticalHQ If laws are decided by referenda that is by definition a democratic not republican form of government those aren't the same thing

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@Snarfalarf @Father_McCarthy @Soupycloth You realize those two things are Contradictory right, either the court is the least powerful branch or it has final say on every government action and is the most powerful

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@RRR33344455566 @kyleraccio That’s not how that works the legislature sets the laws not referendums

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@riptide430 @dave_roland That clearly says that SCOTUS’s stay is terminated if the 8th circuit finds in favor of the plaintiff

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@Snarfalarf @Father_McCarthy @Soupycloth Marbury vs Madison was decided by the Supreme court, a branch of government can’t give itself power the judicial branch was specifically meant to be the least powerful

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@tonymess @AGCHanaway @DLHoskins The Judiciary is not independent and coequal it is subservient to the legislature

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@traaademark @FedMarrux @fpost729 @ThePoliticalHQ No a referendum can’t override a state legislature Article IV section 4 says each state MUST have a republican form of government that portion of the MO constitution is federally Unconstitutional

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@Snarfalarf @Father_McCarthy @Soupycloth Yes they can there is no one above them that can decide that

[Randomname @michael84866379]

@Nebraskawriter2 @realerikjanthes For now