Michele

[EverythingIsFake @rachelknows26]

Reddington got a point!! 🔥

[Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll]

The DA’s whole answer to “Where is the evidence she did this?” was truly shocking.

She started by saying the evidence is voluminous. Then she listed her voluminous things. Almost all of them were the errand.

1) She’s the only one in the home.
2) She sent him out.
3) The call is on her phone.
4) Video of him at the store and the restaurant.
5) He came home and found her and found the kids.

Then two that weren’t about the errand.
6) They said her DNA was on the ends she had to pull. That was a lie.
Yellow ends exclude her.
Black ends weren’t interpreted.
Blue ends are a family list.

7) Then a pastor story that is not in the pastor’s notes. The first written voice is the defense psychologist on February 6. Another lie.

That was the “voluminous” evidence.
His errand.
A false sentence about the bands.
Another false statement.

If this is sufficient to prove someone is the murderer, we are all in danger.

[EverythingIsFake @rachelknows26]

I love that he went after the boots Patrick wasn’t wearing at the restaurant

[GodFatherOfChaos @godfatherofchao]

Kevin Reddington is raising concerns about the absence of blood smears and the possibility of false memories in the case.

It’s important to note that he’s not arguing that Lindsay Clancy is innocent. Instead, he’s suggesting that a rational jury might find reasonable doubt in the prosecution’s case and that it’s possible that Lindsay Clancy had a false memory of the events that transpired that night.

[HustleBitch @HustleBitch_]

🚨 SURGEON WARNS PEOPLE TO STOP USING WET WIPES — SAYS THEY’RE TRIGGERING HERPES OUTBREAKS

A surgeon just went nuclear on the billion dollar wet wipe industry saying he has “yet to find one that’s not causing problems.”

He says the combination of fabric, trapped moisture and preservatives can seriously irritate one of the most sensitive areas of your body.

Then he dropped the bombshell:

“It activates herpes.”

He claims he sees “a ton of herpes infections” in patients using wet wipes, along with HPV-related anal warts and painful fissures that struggle to heal because people keep wiping already damaged skin.

People are spending billions on wipes because they’re marketed as the cleaner, fresher option while this surgeon says they could be doing the exact opposite down there.

If a surgeon is seeing herpes outbreaks, anal warts and tears that won’t heal in people using wet wipes, why the hell are these things still being sold as “clean”?

[ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸 @ImBreckWorsham]

Netanyahu: "I can penetrate this machine (a smartphone) and make you out to be a monster. And if I say it enough people believe it."

This is how he has infiltrated every aspect of our government. He manipulates, threatens, blackmails and intimidates until he gets his way.

And if that doesn't work, he send in the honeypots to trap the holdouts.

This man is a monster. He doesn't even try to hide it.

[Kendall @KendallSals]

#PatrickDidIt
Go Big Red! 🔥
Justice for #LindsayClancy

[EverythingIsFake @rachelknows26]

Happy to see Reddington point out the obvious that there is no evidence she killed her kids.

[Stew Peters @realstewpeters]

Charlie Kirk’s assassination was the same playbook as The Thomas Crown Affair.

How many Tyler Robinsons were on the UVU campus on September 10, 2025?

[Lauren Conlin @conlin_lauren]

Back in the scrum! Kevin Reddington speaks out after court,responding to questions about prosecutors’ request for a potential gag order.Reddington points out that he has filed just one motion involving the lone holdout juror, whose fundraiser has now surpassed $400,000, before taking aim at the juror’s attorney: “He’s not a serious person.”

Listen⬇️

[SAY BYE BYE😊 @DonnaDkent123]

HE NEEDS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE AND HE NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED…..Thats my opinion…..

[Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll]

Wow. Where was that Kevin Reddington during the trial?

It is very rare that attorneys argue something that wasn’t in their motion. But he did. He hit on what we’ve been talking about and it sure took the DA by surprise! I am so happy!😁

[Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll]

If you can read this and not be shocked and enraged, I will be surprised.

January 24, 2023, evening.
Duxbury. Winter.

First officers arrive to a severely injured, barely conscious woman on the back lawn, with a man standing over her. He claims that right before they arrived, she uttered two sentences - exactly the words he needed:

•"I tried to kill myself."
•"They’re in the basement."

No first responder hears those statements. Neither does the 911 dispatcher.

Remove those unsubstantiated claims, and you have two parents who are both suspects. But not in Plymouth County.

Two and a half hours later, the husband provides a detailed statement that establishes the entire state narrative. The plot is set: he was out on a 37-minute errand she requested, he came home, she had jumped, and she told him where the children were.

In that narrative, she committed a triple homicide and attempted suicide four different ways, all within 37 minutes.

At this point, there is no crime lab report. There is no scientific time of death. There are no fingerprints on the bands. There is only a quiet house, a yard, a basement, and the one adult who can speak. Investigators take his words as the complete case.

The wife never wakes up as a free person to be asked what happened. She wakes up in a Boston hospital with a severed spine, intubated, medicated, and under police guard. She asks for her family, but it is denied. She is already a defendant in every hallway.

The call that locks it occurs on February 6, the day before her arraignment. The defense psychologist, Paul Zeizel, allows her to use his phone to speak to her husband on speaker. She has not had a single private, unmonitored conversation with her own family. From this call emerges the next sentence the defense will rely on: she allegedly mentions a man's voice telling her what to do.

This is not an independent forensic interview. This is the other adult and a defense psychologist on the same line, two weeks into her confinement, before she has had anyone she knows by her side.

February 7. Arraignment via Zoom from the hospital bed. She pleads not guilty. By then, the public narrative is fixed, fueled by the husband's initial two sentences and the newly reported "voice." The defense strategy proceeds as if the act is an established fact, leaving only her mental state to be debated.

From the moment the first flashlight hit the lawn to the moment she enters her plea on camera, the identity of the perpetrator is never built from physical evidence at the crime scene. It is narrated by the co-suspect. She is forced to inhabit that story before she can even sit up.

Three and a half years later, the prosecution still lacks fingerprints or physical proof placing her on those weapons. They possess the exact same story delivered two and a half hours after the initial 911 call.

The District Attorney failed to fulfill the burden of proof. There is no forensic evidence establishing that Lindsay Clancy committed these murders. The assumptions defy both mathematics and science. The state charged the individual who could not speak, relying entirely on the words of the one who could.

Judge Sullivan must invoke Rule 25(a) to show the people of Massachusetts that constitutional rights remain valid, even when the prosecution chooses to ignore them. Lindsay Clancy is not guilty.

[Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll]

@catturd2 I’ve been trying to tell you guys that the headlines manipulated you.

[ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸 @ImBreckWorsham]

🤣😂🤣😂 I. AM. DEAD.

There is no way in HELL I am EVER deleting this app.

[Kacee Allen @KaceeRAllen]

Rabbi Michael Barclay just offered TPUSA’s Andrew Kolvet funding “within a month” if they set up schools that are Jewish instead of Christian.

They’re not even hiding it.

[EverythingIsFake @rachelknows26]

More holes than Swiss cheese

[Briana Whitney @BrianaWhitney]

Kevin Reddington is saying in court that Lindsay Clancy never admitted to killing the kids and asked “where’s the evidence that she did this?”

He said the investigation was “horrendous” and that the timeframe of Patrick leaving does not match - that Lindsay did not have enough time to do this.

He says she has no memory of killing the kids.

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

Also I can’t get over Erika describing her faith as evangelical and Catholic hybrid.

Foremost, no. That’s actually not how the Catholic faith works. You either accept the authority of the church or you don’t.

Also, the honest answer is —it depends on her audience. It depends on which donor is cutting the check.

[GodFatherOfChaos @godfatherofchao]

Lindsay Clancy’s attorney criticizes the rhetoric surrounding her case, then brings up President Trump.

The attorney argues that politicians, including President Trump, have gone off on a tangent by making horrific allegations about Clancy, labeling her a demon and possessed, and suggesting she should be executed.