WHISTLEBLOWER CAUGHT THE FRAUD, THE NHS CAUGHT AMNESIA
Sharmila Chowdhury @sharmilaxx gave the NHS 30 years of clean service. Not one blemish. Then she did something apparently unforgivable.
She noticed two consultant radiologists at Ealing Hospital, run by London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust @LNWH_NHS, billing the NHS for shifts they were actually spending at a private hospital down the road.
Getting paid twice for the same hours is fraud everywhere on earth.
Everywhere except, apparently, inside an NHS complaints process.
She reported it.
To her line manager.
To the Medical Director.
To the HR Director.
To Counter Fraud.
To the Chief Executive.
To Number 10.
To the Treasury.
She built a paper trail so solid that ITV @itvnews later sent an undercover team into the same hospital years on and filmed the same consultants still taking cash from patients for private ultrasounds on NHS premises.
The Trust's response to all that diligence was to sack her, based on counter allegations later shown to be fabricated.
The man behind those allegations reportedly signed off an email too crude to print here.
He picked up a Top Mentor award from the Trust that same year. Nobody writes comedy this good on purpose.
Sharmila took it to tribunal and won. Won the appeal too.
A judge ordered the Trust to reinstate her. The Trust said no. She was then quietly blacklisted across the NHS.
One job offer was withdrawn the moment they worked out who she was. Legal costs hit £130,000.
Somewhere in the middle of it she developed breast and lung cancer, which her doctors link to years of sustained stress.
The two consultants kept their jobs.
George Osborne could not get involved.
Andrew Lansley could not get involved.
David Cameron could not get involved.
Every one of them filed it under employment matter, Whitehall for we would rather not know.
A proven fraud case, covered by ITV @itvnews, the Guardian, Daily Mail @DailyMail, Channel 4 News @Channel4News, the Independent @Independent, BBC News @BBCNews, the Times @thetimes and the Daily Mirror @DailyMirror.
The official position of Her Majesty's Government was still not our problem.
This is the reward system.
Report fraud, lose your career, lose your health, and watch the people you reported get promoted.
Jew hate is brain rot, as Charlie Kirk always said. No matter what goes wrong anywhere in the world, scum like Javier Bardem will blame the only Jewish state for it.
Carbon capture at scale is a money pit with no guarantee of success or return. So it was wise to bin it. It also creates very few jobs, being capital intensive. So the trashing of 100,000 jobs is nationalist fantasy.
I’m not saying separatists are stupid, but …
Last month, Diane Abbott stood up at a conference in London and described Ukraine’s defence against Russian invasion as, and I quote, “the NATO campaign against Russia” (watch from the 1 minute mark).
Labour are genuinely mad to let her back in.
Nauseating hypocrisy. You and your party’s green mongering over the years have driven BP and others away. You gave virtue signalling priority over jobs, families, communities. And now you express concern for them. Pass the sick bag. Scotland is truly run by a kakistocracy. But Scots only have themselves to blame. They keep electing self-serving numpties.
Classic western saviour syndrome, trotting around the world thinking you can just do what you like and those dumb Asïan countries will comply and bow to your moral superiority. Just play your Bristolian trip-hop and stfu.
Massive Bell-Ends.
I have been informed by the Oxford Union that the video of the Islam debate I spoke in has not been published because "two speaker consent forms were outstanding." All the speakers on my side consented – they forced us to sign before they would allow us into the debate.
So it seems that two of the speakers on the other side were permitted to speak without signing, and are now afraid of the debate being seen.
@Jacob_Rees_Mogg did you consent? Or was it the President herself? Or 'Abdullah al Andalusi' (Also known as Mouloud Farid and as Wazir Leton Rahman) or Michael Dawud?
This is quite mind bogglingly bad. It's like listening to an adolescent troll from here in 2020.
Zero understanding and massive smugness.
It's entertaining, in a way, until you realize how much it discredits any serious human rights work at the UN.
@AlexXanthaki Yes of course they're men. They're male adults. I don't use "man" & "woman" to refer to the indefinable concept of "gender identity". It has nothing to do with sport, for starters. And I reject "gender", which is just sex-based behaviour/presentation stereotypes. It's harmful.
@AlexXanthaki Thanks. The reasoning is astonishingly specious. A near perfect illustration of the obliteration of women’s rights in discrimination and human rights law which inevitably follows from redefining “women” to mean “women and some men”. I’m amazed you think it’s convincing.
Two hundred of the thousand acres at Diddly Squat grew nothing at all this year. That was a decision taken in advance, on a spreadsheet. Wheat or barley on that ground was a guaranteed loss before the drill left the shed, so Jeremy Clarkson left it bare and explained why in his Sun column this week.
One line from it went everywhere. Farmers have reached the point where it is quite simply impossible to make money from growing food. Every paper carried that sentence, and every paper stopped there.
The list underneath it did not get printed anywhere.
Because he went on to set out what two hundred acres of good English ground could do instead of feeding anyone, and there were four items on it.
- Rent it to a global agri-company growing crops for anaerobic digesters.
- Cover it in solar panels.
- Put a data centre on it.
- Sell the farm to a Chinese company for a multistorey high-intensity piggery.
Every one of those pays. The only use of that land which reliably loses money is the one that puts food on a British plate. He added that he was not being ridiculous, and that anybody in 1926 would have laughed you out of the room for suggesting the factories would be gone by 2026.
Now the bit with a date on it.
From 1 January 2027 the UK's carbon border tax applies to imported fertiliser. The Treasury's own costings put the take at £140 million in 2027-28, rising to £180 million the year after. Estimates of the hit run from around £33 a tonne to £75, which is a fifth to a quarter added to the largest input bill an arable farm carries. The Central Association of Agricultural Valuers has warned that a typical 500 acre cereals farm could be down as much as £70,000 once fertiliser and fuel costs land.
So the fertiliser that grows the wheat gets taxed on a known date, in writing, by a government that says out loud it wants food security.
Nobody in Whitehall has ever signed a policy to stop Britain growing food. They have signed a great many that make every alternative pay better, which arrives at the same field.
And understand whose field this is. Diddly Squat has a television crew, a farm shop with a queue down the lane, a pub, a lager brand, a bestselling book every autumn and one of the best land agents in the country. It is the most commercially advantaged thousand acres in Britain, and two hundred of them were left bare this year because putting seed in them was the losing move.
Every arable farmer in England is doing that same sum this autumn. Almost none of them have a production company to cover the difference.
Those two hundred acres have not gone out of production. They are waiting to hear which industry wants them more than you do.
The TQ+ movement is homophobic; that's a big part of what I'm against. Identifying and calling out homophobia is difficult because liars like you grossly misuse the language.