@kenbwork What makes you think folks have not done this?
“If you were to build a company just to commercialize vanilla single cell at scale…what would tissue dissociation, viability staining, purification, library prep, analysis, etc. actually look like? ”
@kenbwork It is likely worth spending timing talking to CROs about their challenges and cost structure. Growing a physical lab to address a rapidly changing market using many assays is a difficult task. It may waste money to “over” optimize when things change quickly.
@OmicsOmicsBlog@GenomicsCow I was thinking along the lines of the comment from @GenomicsCow about microscopy being commoditized compared to NGS. The imaging tech behind sequencers still amazes me
@GenomicsCow@mehtamanal@hoheyn@OmicsOmicsBlog@LGMartelotto@MollyminHe An assay isn't a product, but you can't have a product without an assay.
This is incredibly exciting work, but it takes a lot of work to turn something that works to something that works for most people, most of the time. That said, I'm excited to see the future for this tech!
@ToumyGG@GenomicsCow@CatharineAquino Isn't that the definition of "funding" though? These all rely on having sufficient funding to build something that meets rapidly changing market needs AND test its commercial viability.
@CatharineAquino Making flexible, innovative, and disruptive tools is a seemingly impossible balance between being innovative, getting to market quickly, and building something robust. The grace to balance these often comes down to funding as @GenomicsCow suggests.
@lpachter That is true art!
My head knows upset plots are better, but they can be difficult to interpret without careful thought. Not every plot can be perfect i suppose.