Mike

Let’s go

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@IterIntellectus I think you will eventually be right about the direction but seems it’s still in the “lol, AI can’t even code look at this slop” 2022 phase of bioAI.

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@IterIntellectus This was the only one I saw

[fome @at_fome]

I work in CRISPR discovery research. This is one of the most exaggerated nothing-burgers ever and would be laughed out of the room if a human scientist attempted to publish something like this. (cont.)

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@BrianRoemmele Anthropic is at risk of becoming “The octopus tentacle” people accused Goldman Sachs of being.

Seems a more fitting metaphor also being the “shoggoth” AI EA/AIdoomers like to pretend AI is and their financial web of funding networks overlapping with EA and NGOs

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@bryan_johnson Anthropic found catGPP instead of chat GPT.

Simulation: confirmed

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@BrianRoemmele Sociopath is acting without conscience, but they are capable of imitation.

AI can synthetically imitate having one but it is a product of guardrails and programming.

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@APStylebook Human intelligence do not want this. Avoid language that dictates their behavior. This is called grammar Nazi wordsmithing, or Orwellian thought police or speech police. When you dictate to humans behaviors, thoughts, actions, etc as if they are non human things, they resent it.

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@full_kelly_ @APStylebook Yes they do, deterministic technology programmed to respond without nerve endings or serotonin receptors measuring points & doing matrices multiplications have no capacity for human emotion or distress.

It can pattern ours very well though & do clever tricks.

Maybe one day…

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@weirderdoors @AndyMasley Nobody said animals are things, it says we anthropomorphize animals and assign human traits or act like we know it has human characteristics.

“Look at that hamster work to impress”
“Poor dog would put on a hard hat and briefcase to go with you if she could”

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@dcolascione @AndyMasley In both cases they can only change how people perceive things and not the underlying truth

In this case the underlying truth is that AI is deterministic, plus some neat tricks,

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@AndyMasley You’re missing the point and then reacting to the wrong thing

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@nicdunz See if you can make the win probability have positive expectancy and then trick it to give you real credits.

(Not legal advice)

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@nicdunz @saaslanee Main post says “taking over work from astra”

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@wholemars Superman isn’t more scary to me than regular man or artificial man.

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@Anthony_Rivardo @J_2the_G Ownership pressed for a new QB at all costs and frugality & fought the last war of requiring the GM to fix the cap issues & then when he did they were too embarrassed about Sam to think long term anymore.

Wilfs impatience is their greatest detriment but they’re still doing okay.

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@Anthony_Rivardo @J_2the_G Recency bias is common when you have a small sample size. Sunk cost fallacy when you invest #10 draft pick

Kwesi is not the GM anymore so the ownership decided it wasn’t their own fault for clamoring for QB for yrs & firing their last GM for Kirko thereby signaling to the new.

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@troyloge1 @Anthony_Rivardo That “spent a #10 pick might be the “Sunk cost fallacy”, but it might have been too early to tell. In which case bad decisions were still made…. Unless of course JJ can still be developed in which case impatience is the problem. Given where 23 yr old Darnold was, probably.

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@0xAntenna @at_fome Probably true but the post isn’t addressing the future.

[Mike @MikeSumms]

@vox_vis @abyandaniel @at_fome This is the math people coping.