Independent Flare infrastructure. Built to run. ☀️
🔶 FTSO data provider — delegate WFLR, earn $FLR
🔷 Validator node — stake FLR, secure the network
Live metrics. Verified addresses. Transparent history.
Everything at https://t.co/ioHCxonZil 🧵
MirSFlr is steadily building on Flare. ⚡
Solid APR, a fully staked validator, reliable FTSO & FDC operations, and continuous improvements across the stack.
Independent infrastructure, long-term commitment and real skin in the game.
Delegate with confidence. #Flare
Flare $FLR is now tradable on Swyftx.
Flare is a Layer 1 blockchain built to bring outside data onto the chain, so smart contracts can use price feeds and information from other blockchains and the web.
Buy, sell and trade $FLR now: https://t.co/6VlNpFlXaB
@TeeCeeUncut LOL, It's no secret, this is why I share the filters from @flaremetrics so y'all can see for yourself as well, but the top validators with the best APR is:
@Mirhollio with a 12.2%
&
@knotnodes and @ftsocan with 11.3%
$xrp $FLR
https://t.co/rOxIqdJT69
Important Update On SparkDEXs FTSO ⚠️
After careful consideration, SparkDEX will be winding down its own FTSO on Flare.
We want to be fully transparent about why, and exactly what it means for everyone who has delegated to us 👇🏻
@FlareNetworks Fam.
I’m no longer supporting @SceptreLS / sFLR. I used liquid staking because I was told the underlying FLR sat in a protocol and was distributed across many validators. That was the risk model I accepted: smart-contract risk plus diversified node risk.
👉 A reminder for Flare infrastructure providers.
Provider diversity is a security property of the network.
Under FIP.02, the FTSO self-policing framework can act against behavior that weakens that diversity, including:
• Collusion: providers showing strong statistical correlation or clearly submitting through the same node.
• Duplication: multiple provider identities on the same network controlled by the same entity, running largely the same code and producing substantially similar submissions.
The process is intentionally public. Evidence is discussed first, the provider can respond, and Management Group members decide whether a formal chill proposal should proceed to a vote.
A first chill removes the provider from the whitelist for 2 reward epochs. A second chill results in a permanent ban.
Decentralization depends on having genuinely independent participants and we have a clear rules/resources for everyone to work together in the best possible way.
Your $FLR rewards are only as good as your validator. Here's this week's top picks.
Numbers don't lie. Pull the raw data and see which validators actually hold up:
🔗 https://t.co/rOxIqdJT69
🔗 https://t.co/N5DyljznaJ
#Flare $XRP #Defi
@XRPizdaway@flaremetrics@BifrostWallet@knotnodes@XRPizdaway Yup, looks like you’ve already reached the 3-validator staking limit 😄 I really appreciate you trying to choose us — you’ll be more than welcome to join us in the next staking round! ☀️🤝
FDC gives smart contracts a standardized way to verify facts that happened outside Flare.
Today it supports 7 attestation types.
• AddressValidity: check whether an address is valid for a supported chain.
• EVMTransaction: verify transaction data from Ethereum, Flare and Songbird.
• Web2Json: fetch Web2 data, transform it with JQ and return ABI-encoded output to contracts.
• Payment: verify payments on XRP, Bitcoin and Dogecoin.
• ConfirmedBlockHeightExists: prove that a sufficiently confirmed block exists.
• BalanceDecreasingTransaction: prove that a transaction reduced an address balance.
• ReferencedPaymentNonexistence: prove that a specific referenced payment did not occur within a defined time window.
FDC can attest both that something happened and, under defined conditions, that something did not happen.
Docs: https://t.co/xJI1UUKPnK