Summoning my favourite protocols @Lighter_xyz@LidoFinance@aave to join the movement!
ETHGas is introducing the Open Gas Initiative, eliminating gas fees from the end-user experience
Learn more: https://t.co/azEoYMT7VX
https://t.co/uh1E9vJJBN
Introducing the Open Gas Initiative - a way for protocols to subsidize gas for users, zero-code, for a seamless, frictionless onchain experience.
With OG cohort: @eigencloud, @ether_fi, @pendle_fi, @Velvet_Capital.
👇
Discovered my Gas ID via ETHGas - turning my gas spend into rewards 🫘
As a Hero Jack, I've spent 1.5406 ETH on gas but earned 1000 Beans back.
Get your Gas ID and Beans here: https://t.co/tGm3hix4Bl
After five years of work, the team is happy to announce the Zama Confidential Blockchain Protocol and the release of our Public Testnet.
First things first, read the litepaper ⬇️
To be honest, as a simple guy who has nothing to do with VCs or project teams, who has been here since 2018 and has seen a lot, words like the ones here affect me to the core: https://t.co/AKbCcDtc2N
But I will try to be as objective as possible.
Many have seen these graphs, where the tokens of projects whose teams have conducted airdrops have a perpetually red graph. Before we had enough new data on projects that held a token sale instead of an airdrop, these charts looked impressive and truly convinced us that an airdrop is a problem for a project and brings no practical benefit. But now, it has been almost a year since active token sales began, and we can look at some preliminary results.
First, I would like to explain how the research was conducted.
- All projects conducted their TGE in 2025.
- The projects are divided into two categories: those that had a token sale and those that did not, but had a classic airdrop. It is important to note that some projects, for example, all projects from buildpad, also conducted an airdrop.
- In the "sale" category, I did not include projects that only had a launchpool on an exchange, due to the small supply of tokens being sold.
- The fairness of distribution for some airdrops, such as kgen, is difficult to verify, but I also have no data to suggest that the team distributed tokens to themselves, as was the case with apriori (which I did not include in the selection).
- In most cases, the initial FDV was based on the 5-minute chart and indicates the price at which a retail investor could sell the token. However, the high of the candle is not taken into account; instead, the average price over the specified time period is used. Sometimes, when a project was launched at the beginning of the year, the 1-hour chart was used as the source data.
First, I suggest you take a look at the raw numbers for projects, broken down by various launchpads. Here, in addition to the initial and current FDV, the prices at which the tokens were sold are listed. For retail investors, token sales are generally beneficial. They don't have to think about the criteria the team will use to distribute an airdrop. They are given the terms and they simply buy the token. The last column is the ratio of the current price to the initial price of the token. Many will say, well, that's the market, nothing you can do about it. And they will be right.
Now, let's sort this table from the most successful performance to the worst.
Many evaluate the success of a project based on how much they earned. But I repeat, this is not about retail investors. This is about VCs, who for some reason are trying to prove to us that the entire problem of why project tokens only have a downward movement lies in airdrops. Most of the projects shown here have a clear vertical downward chart. Now let's take a look at how things are with projects that had an airdrop but no token sale.
Doesn't it seem strange to you that out of 36 projects that conducted a token sale, only 5 are trading above the TGE price? 3 of which are relatively small, barely reaching a $150m capitalization, while at the same time, out of 20 projects that conducted an airdrop instead of a token sale, 4 projects are trading above TGE and have a capitalization of more than $300m?
Now, looking at these numbers, tell me: were airdrops the problem?
1/ In just a two years, Nexus has gone from a 1 Hz prototype to a global zkVM powering millions of verifiable computations.
Here's our origin story:
https://t.co/0ZIDU1rCVd
1// gnRunners
The Era of the Runner has come to an end. The Zeta Genesis generation is the last that the Hexgrid will see.
The Zeta Genesis collection is here: https://t.co/9lf3wpzU21
We've launched final quests:
- Share Zeta Collection
- BOOSTED: Gridcrew quests
- More soon
@legiondotcc@mattyTokenomics What about ELECTRON ico? Invested in it, founder dont answer for months, no updates, no product, is it scam rag under Legion sauce?
Escaping high gas fees one bean at a time! 🫘
I'm on Gassy Jack's quest - stacking beans and climbing toward a Gasless Future. Join the adventure, complete quests, and grow with us 🌱
https://t.co/2Cd0rQ7NhD
Discovered my Gas ID via ETHGas - turning my gas spend into rewards 🫘
As a Hero Jack, I've spent 1.5406 ETH on gas but earned 1000 Beans back.
Get your Gas ID and Beans here: https://t.co/tGm3hixCqT
Gridcrews are live.
→ Pick your path. Choose SYN, ACK, or FIN.
→ Compete as a crew. Earn collective rewards.
→ One choice. No switches. 15 days of action.
Start proving — together: https://t.co/OTwTp9PU7j
After you've selected a Crew, start questing: https://t.co/4tytEdzzbK