MJ홀랜드

에알 티피 오피

[非国民おじさん @bob_hoffman_jp]

構造的暴力からは目を逸らし、それに対抗する表面上の暴力だけを攻撃する。権力にとってこれほど都合のいい奴隷はいない。

[자몽🍊 @08_jamong_11]

꼴리는 거: 성욕
섹스를 하고 싶은 거: 성적 끌림
누군가를 좋아하는 거: 로맨틱/무로맨틱 끌림
사귀고 싶은 거: 관계 맺기 끌림

[프로일라인 @bichwii1789]

내 책장에는 불륜의 전당이 있음

[지금 여성시대는… @nowyeosi]

나 지금 쪽팔리고 민망해서 뒤질거같아

[미지 @kyokanowife]

두컷만화

[beanpicker @beanpicker]

이 사진 자체가 한 편의 봉준호 영화임

[vol.3 @even_for_vol3]

어쩜 이리 인간이 "좃.까"의 화신일까요... 아무리 생각해도 그 장면 참 잘 줬어요

[Psycho Fella @Psycho_Fella]

Good morning fellas.

[〰️ @j136596]

세종대왕옵 이만큼환영함

[red @bluelemxnade]

I’ve literally never in my entire life had to lick my fingers to turn a book page

[국민 @korea_gookmin]

국감에서 국짐 질의 듣는 박진영 표정

[치정극남자🎗️ @Politics_CP]

아니 박진영 국감 ㅈㄴ웃긴게
국힘이 어떻게든 정치편향되게 엮어서 박진영 나락보내려고 애쓰는데
박진영 여러의미로 순수(퓨어)해서
제가 다했어요! 전 추진력이 넘치고, 애국할거에요! 이래서
국힘: 이새낀뭐지
이상태된거 존웃김

[Pipo - SEEING AESPA!!! ⭐🍋 @PipoAespa]

same person btw

[👽 @icurina]

she just want to go home im crying

[oui cinéma @ouicinema]

Haydée Politoff & Jean-Louis Trintignant

[DepressedBergman @DannyDrinksWine]

Éric Rohmer explains why he didn't like his movies being screened at crowded theaters:

"If it depended only on me, instead of attracting people to my films, I would try to drive them away. I would tell them the films are more difficult than they really are, because I don’t like to deceive people, I like to show my films to people who can appreciate them.

I’m not interested in the number of spectators. Having said that, it’s true that a film is a commercial undertaking and ought to recover its costs. But as my films don’t cost much, I don’t think I need a very large audience, and I’ve always thought that they should be shown in theaters that aren’t too big. The intimate character of my films doesn’t suit a theater or an audience too large for them. And I don’t think they are suited to a mass reaction or a collective reaction. It’s better if the spectator feels he is experiencing a completely personal reaction to it.

Each reaction should be unique, individual, and different. I think the film is enjoyed better if the spectators aren’t sitting too near one another, if the theater isn’t too full, and they don’t know each other. Then each has a different reaction. That’s better than a theater where there’s a uniform reaction. I don’t like watching one of my films in public and it distresses me if everyone laughs in the same place, as my film wasn’t made with that in mind. I didn’t write something just to make everyone laugh at the same time. It’s all right if someone smiles, but it shouldn’t happen at exactly the same place in the film. Perhaps this is because my films are more like reading than like watching a spectacle; they are made more to be read like a book than seen like something on the stage. So it distresses me to see a collective reaction."

(Éric Rohmer's interview with Éric Rohmer, 1971)

Clip from:

La collectionneuse (1967)
Director: Éric Rohmer

[DepressedBergman @DannyDrinksWine]

Full Excerpt:

"Interviewer: Would you agree that the endings of your films tend to be rather sad?

Rohmer: They are not what one is expecting to happen; they are to some extent against the person concerned. What happens is against the wishes of the character, it’s a kind of disillusionment, a conflict—not exactly a failure on his part but a disillusionment.

The character has made a mistake; he realizes he has created an illusion for himself. He had created a kind of world for himself, with himself at the center, and it all seemed perfectly logical that he should be the ruler or the god of this world.

Everything seemed very simple and all my characters are a bit obsessed with logic. They have a system and principles, and they build up a world that can be explained by this system. And then the conclusion of the film demolishes their system and their illusions collapse. It’s not exactly happy, but that’s what the films are all about."

(Éric Rohmer's interview with Graham Petrie, 1971)

[DepressedBergman @DannyDrinksWine]

La collectionneuse (1967, Rohmer)

"All my characters are a bit obsessed with logic. They have a system & principles, & they build up a world that can be explained by this system. Then the conclusion of the film demolishes their system & their illusions collapse."

— Éric Rohmer