I'll never raise VC funds again for my startups ever โ
not because I hate VCs - some of them are great people
but the math just doesn't work for what I'm building
here's why the math never works for builders like me:
- say a VC raises a $100M fund - they'd need to return 3x to their investors
- that's min $300m from one fund with maybe 20 bets
- so every single company they back needs to have a shot at a billion-dollar outcome. that's not a preference, that's a structural requirement
- now if Revid does $1M MRR, that's life-changing money for me but for a VC fund, it's a rounding error
- the only way they make money is through a big fat exit. acquisition, IPO, or another round at a higher valuation so someone else can take the risk off their hands ๐คฏ
our incentives are completely misaligned from day one, and when incentives are misaligned, pressure follows
raising forces you to grow at a pace that you and the market aren't ready for
you hire fast, burn fast, pivot fast, and die fast trying to hit a number someone else wrote on a whiteboard
meanwhile I wake up every morning and decide what to build, who to hire, what to charge
no board meeting, no quarterly targets I didn't set, and no one asking why I didn't grow 3x this year
Revid, Outrank, SuperX, PostSyncer, Feather - all profitable, all mine ๐
the portfolio just crossed $1m mrr and the best part isn't the numbers
it's that I feel completely free โบ๏ธ
free to move fast, change direction, double down, or slow down - whatever feels right
no one wrote that on a whiteboard for me
staying small and profitable keeps you alive long enough to actually figure things out
that's not a consolation prize - that's the whole game, at least for me ๐
Need to share markdown quickly? We solved this.
AI agents give you markdown.
You need shareable pages.
So @mlachmish and I built https://t.co/ZjM2hsSJR7 ๐
One command. Clean URL. Auto-expires in 24h.
https://t.co/SsGOvCqzFp
AI agents that work 24/7 sound great until they expose your real bottleneck.
It was never about coding speed. It's about knowing what to build.
Technical founders who do GTM have the edge. You see the funnel AND the codebase.
You don't build features. You build growth.
Hot take: most founders should learn to build a landing page before they learn to code. If you can't sell the idea in one page, the product won't save you.
Someone asked what advice founders ignore. That they:
1. Should change their name.
2. Should launch fast.
3. Shouldn't treat fundraising as success.
4. Shouldn't assume they can raise because it's time to.
5. Should fire bad people quickly.
6. Shouldn't talk to acquirers.
@ivanburazin Ship something real, not a deck. The gap between "launched" and "acquired" used to be years. Now it's weeks. The bar isn't lower. The feedback loop is just faster.
Best productivity hack nobody talks about: make the first version embarrassingly small. Not MVP. Smaller. One screen. One flow. Ship it. Watch what happens. Then build the next inch.
Every startup says "we're AI-first" now. Most of them just wrapped an API call in a nice UI. That's not a product, that's a feature. The gap between demo and product has never been wider.