🇩🇪 Of Course ‘Citizen Vigilante’ got banned in Germany..! 🇩🇪
Just image each case would been based on a REAL TRUE GERMAN immigrant crime.
It would have getting Uwe Boll almost Indisputable in REAL BIG TROUBLE.. !! 👿 @BollFILMS#CitizenVigilante#UweBoll#Germany
Today, I’m releasing never before seen intelligence revealing new evidence of past US government funding for more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including Ukraine.
In support of President Trump‘s Executive Order to end federal funding of dangerous gain of function research around the world, and increase transparency and accountability, ODNI will continue working with partners across the Administration to identify where these labs are, what pathogens they contain, and what “research” is being conducted.
https://t.co/pLMD0krc69
Just remember, your brain was not designed to metabolise every bad thing happening everywhere all the time. That’s a path to misery. You’re not designed to give a shit about foreign politics, or an earthquake 5,000 miles away. You’re built to care for your people, and that’s it.
Remember this.
The same people calling you “unprofessional” now had no issue when professionalism was bent to fit the moment.
>When official DoD guidance tied reflected DEI metrics.
>When politically charged training requirements expanded until warfighting time got squeezed out.
>When leaders were expected to signal alignment with identity initiatives in command messaging.
>When thousands were separated under the COVID mandate amid uneven exemptions and unanswered questions.
None of that triggered a crisis of “professionalism.” Because it wasn’t about professionalism. It was about alignment.
Now the standard suddenly snaps back into place the moment someone refuses to play along. Now tone matters, words matter, and decorum is everything. Sorry, but no.
It’s selective, convenient, and everyone watching can see it for what it is.
Don’t lecture anyone on “professionalism” now. You forfeited that ground a long time ago.
Muammar Gaddafi at the 2009 United Nation Assembly: "They will create the virus themselves and sell you the antidotes. Thereafter,they will pretend to take time to find the solution when they already have it."
🔥🚨BREAKING: The dictator of Cuba, Miguel Díaz Canel, announced on a national broadcast that Cuba has submitted to Trump and are now negotiating with the United States. This is historic.
🇺🇸🙏🇺🇸
In April 1972, Thomas Norris sailed straight into enemy rivers wearing a fisherman's disguise.
Command said the pilots were irretrievable.
Norris was 24, a Navy SEAL operating inside North Vietnam. Two U.S. pilots had been shot down. Patrol boats everywhere. Checkpoints on every river bend. Enemy soldiers hunting them day and night. Rescue planners called it impossible.
Norris volunteered.
He moved at night through swamps and jungle with South Vietnamese commandos. Lt. Col. Iceal Hambleton had survived 11 days alone behind enemy lines. Norris found him, hid him, and guided him through darkness to the Cua Viet River. A U.S. ship pulled them out alive.
Then Norris went back.
Deeper. Harder. More patrols.
With Nguyen Van Kiet, he located Lt. Mark Clark and brought him out under increasing enemy pressure. Two men saved from certain capture.
For that, Norris received the Medal of Honor.
Six months later, October 31, 1972, his recon team was ambushed by 50 to 100 North Vietnamese soldiers. Norris was shot in the head. His skull fractured. His left eye destroyed. He collapsed and was presumed dead.
One man refused to accept that.
Mike Thornton ran back through gunfire, lifted Norris onto his shoulders, fought to the ocean, and swam 2 hours under fire until a U.S. ship reached them.
Norris survived. Metal plate in his skull. Lost eye.
Years of recovery.
The only time 1 Medal of Honor recipient saved another.
Most people still have no idea who Thomas Norris is.
Thoughts? 💭 In a powerful seminar interaction, a woman tells Tony Robbins that she identifies as “99% masculine.” To test this claim, Robbins uses a provocative insult to gauge her reaction. When she laughs warmly and engages playfully rather than reacting defensively, he points out that her core nature is actually feminine.
He then analyzes her relationship patterns, noting that she surrounds herself with more passive men—who embody “feminine” energy—that she can easily control. Robbins argues that she maintains this control by tearing them down or emasculating them, either verbally or mentally. He concludes that her proclaimed “masculinity” is actually a defense mechanism designed to ensure safety and certainty. This armor prevents her from experiencing the deep intimacy, surrender, and connection she truly desires with a genuinely strong partner. I was not prepared for the ending 😆