We can go to space to find more gold if there was enough demand
But what if i told you that currently there is a bitcoin developer who wants to breake the 21m limit.
The only thing standing between us and that is bitcoiners running their own node and enforcing the rules!
Thank u!
8.6% is far from enough for BIP110 to succeed, IMO.
It's up to those plebs now, who continue to live in a fantasy world, thinking that stacking sats is enough.
BIP110 is the only chance to prove that Bitcoin is decentralized = ungovernable asset, controlled by nobody in particular.
Run BIP110, Run Datum and mine Bitcoin, or the stacked sats, will become worthless.
https://t.co/wfVaa9ynNN
@palmbtcX I think the price is irrelevant. Bitcoin has to be used as p2p electronic cash. As long as this level of adoption hasn't happened yet it ain't over.
Furthermore we have a current community split over the direction of development that hasn't been cleared yet.
Price is irrelevant
@0300dbdd1b@philip_dath You realize your argument could be used as a big block justification right?
A big blocker could use your argument word for word for why big blocks are better "Oh too much resources? Just prune your node"
Prunning is a centralization risk
It also doesn't address the csam risk
@intangiblecoins It's not hypothetical we are already seeing the effects. Try to spin up a node (any node) and see how long it takes to download the entire history of the blockchain from 2009-2023 and then 2023 and upwards!
Keyword here: inscriptions