The more indicators someone crams onto a chart, the less convinced I am they understand price.
Most technical indicators are just delayed transformations of the same underlying data. They often create the illusion of depth while telling you what the stock already did.
Give me the trend, price structure, volume, a few key moving averages and the broader market for context.
A chart should clarify the trade—not bury it.
@citrini It’s not that complicated. Everyone’s just chasing what’s hot right now, prompting fast rotations. Notice how nobody is talking about crypto (for now). It’s all thematics
Revisiting my Blend Labs $BLND bull thesis --the stock has fallen; the business, however, has quietly moved in the opposite direction. https://t.co/kIyAXMtBvp
Revisiting my Blend Labs $BLND bull thesis --the stock has fallen; the business, however, has quietly moved in the opposite direction. https://t.co/kIyAXMtBvp
Recession files (part 18): Even the most iconic boom decade had internal air pockets: the Roaring Twenties did not roar in a straight line. https://t.co/j7Z4k6VT7R
Recession files (part 18): Even the most iconic boom decade had internal air pockets: the Roaring Twenties did not roar in a straight line. https://t.co/j7Z4k6VT7R
10 reasons to be bearish on stocks:
1. Valuations already assume a near-perfect outcome.
2. Earnings expectations leave almost no room for disappointment.
3. The entire index increasingly depends on a handful of companies.
4. AI spending is being valued as permanently exponential.
5. Investors are treating projected productivity as realized profit.
6. Margin debt is exploding.
7. Bond yields offer real competition to equities again.
8. Fiscal deficits are supporting growth—but also keeping rates higher.
9. Passive flows have turned concentration into a self-reinforcing trade.
10. Everyone knows stocks are expensive, and almost nobody believes that matters anymore.
That last one may be the biggest warning of all..
Posting your percentage P&L without the nominal amount is just performance cosplay, yet to many people do it in an effort to gain more subscribers.
A 200% return on $500 is not more impressive than a 20% return on $500,000.
Percentages show efficiency.
Nominal gains show whether you actually had the conviction, capital, sizing, and risk tolerance to make the trade matter.
Without both, the screenshot is missing the part that separates a good bet from a meaningful one.
Love him or hate him, @elonmusk forced a once-government-dominated industry to behave more like a market.
That’s the real story behind my latest chart: not space as fantasy, but space as a cost curve finally bending hard enough to change the economics of orbit. https://t.co/2A5n5rtOFW