Why are you even telling us this if you're going to increase STX block rewards every time you decide more STX is needed?
If you're going to come back in a year saying you need more, and then again two years later saying the same thing, what's the point of having any standards at all? At that point, why not just issue 10,000 STX per block and promise a 30% annual yield?
If this gets changed again, who is supposed to have any confidence in the token supply? I've lost count of how many times the tokenomics have been modified over the past two years. I expect even more changes over the next two.
One of the main reasons I reluctantly supported SIP-031 was because it was presented as, "Let's make this adjustment now so we don't have to keep coming back and asking for more STX in the future." Now I honestly have no idea what the plan is anymore.
And while people will say that community feedback will be taken into consideration, the reality is that this ecosystem rarely engages with feedback that disagrees with its preferred direction. I suspect this repost will be treated the same way.
Excited to be sharing the first draft of the PoX-5 SIP, the proposal that introduces Bitcoin Staking to Stacks.
We invite feedback from the community and core contributors before it moves to a ratification vote.
Read the draft and share your thoughts:
https://t.co/VQzpwpHPv3
@francescoweb3@gregorioki11607 maybe right.. i can't sure they will see even though i translate.
If you have chance to translate and post about it, i will support 100% !
I don't have any complain about voting power being exercised in proportion to the amount of tokens someone holds. What I don't like is when people pretend to gather opinions, only for things to proceed exactly as planned anyway, while presenting the outcome as if it were a consensus. I'd rather they not pretend in the first place.