π₯I HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR THIS VIDEO IN MY ARCHIVES, FOREVERβΌοΈπ΅
π₯I FINALLY FOUND IT.βββπ³π³π³π³π³π€ππππππππ
Three words killed a $6,000 debt: "the bill of sale"
The collector went silent. The bureau deleted it. And nobody involved could prove they legally owned the account they were trying to collect on, because the document proving it doesn't exist
Here's the mechanism that quietly destroys bought-and-sold consumer debt, and it works because the entire collections industry is built on a paper trail that breaks the second debt changes hands
When you default on a credit card, the original bank doesn't chase you forever. After 180 days they write it off, take the tax deduction, and sell your account in a bulk portfolio, bundled with thousands of other defaulted accounts, to a debt buyer for 2 to 4 cents on the dollar. That debt buyer might hold it, or they might resell it to another buyer, who resells it again. By the time someone is calling you demanding $6,000, your specific account may have changed hands two or three times
And here's the fatal flaw in their entire system. At each sale, what actually transfers is a SPREADSHEET. A massive file with thousands of rows, each one showing a name, a balance, an account number, and some dates. The original signed credit card agreement with YOUR signature does not transfer. The complete account payment history does not transfer. And the individual bill of sale or assignment document proving that YOUR specific account was part of the bundle almost never exists as a standalone document
The bulk bill of sale typically says something like "Seller hereby transfers to Buyer the accounts listed on Schedule A" and Schedule A is a CD or a data file with 40,000 rows. Your specific account is one row. There is no individual document saying "Account #12345 belonging to [your name] is hereby assigned to [collector]"
So when you demand the one document that proves they own YOUR specific debt, the whole thing collapses:
Step 1: send a validation letter demanding the specific ownership documents, not just a statement of the balance. Use this exact language: "Provide the bill of sale or assignment agreement that specifically names and transfers MY account to your company. Provide the complete chain of title from the original creditor through every intermediate owner to you, with documentation at each transfer showing my specific account was included. Provide the original signed credit agreement bearing my signature"
Step 2: they will either go silent (they have nothing) or respond with a computer-generated statement showing your name and balance. That statement is NOT proof of ownership. It's a printout from the same spreadsheet they bought. Reply: "Your response does not satisfy validation requirements. A computer-generated statement is not proof of ownership. You have failed to provide the bill of sale specifically naming my account, the chain of title documenting each transfer, or the original signed agreement. This debt is disputed and unverified"
Step 3: dispute it with all three bureaus citing the broken chain: "The reporting party cannot establish legal ownership of this account. No valid bill of sale naming this specific account, no documented chain of title, and no original signed agreement have been produced despite a formal validation request. This account is unverifiable and must be deleted under the FCRA"
Step 4: if they sue you, and some bottom-tier collectors will try, the bill-of-sale demand is your knockout in court. When they file, you answer and demand discovery, specifically the bill of sale, the complete chain of title with your account individually named at each transfer, and the original signed agreement. Judges dismiss these cases constantly because the collector shows up with a printout from a spreadsheet and no proof they own what they're suing over. No chain of title, no standing, case dismissed
Step 5: if they produce a bulk bill of sale that doesn't individually name your account, challenge it: "The bill of sale references a bulk portfolio but does not individually identify my account. Absent specific documentation that my account was included in the transfer, you have not established standing to collect or report"
A guy I know had a $6,000 credit card debt that had been sold twice, original bank to buyer A, buyer A to buyer B. Buyer B was the one calling. He demanded the bill of sale and the complete chain of title. They mailed him a generic account statement with no assignment documents. He disputed on the grounds they couldn't prove ownership, and it was deleted from all three bureaus in under 4 weeks, because owning a row in a spreadsheet is not owning a debt
Read that again. They were trying to collect $6,000 on an account they couldn't even prove they bought. And this is the norm, not the exception, because the industry runs on spreadsheets, not paperwork
The debt got passed around like a hot potato and nobody kept the receipt for your specific account at any step. That missing receipt is your deletion lmfaooo
(i fix credit in 30-90 days. link in bio)
π§ππ π£ππ‘π§πππ’π‘ πππ π§πππ¦ ππ’π₯ π²π π¬πππ₯π¦. π§ππ ππ¨π ππ‘ ππ’ππ¬ πππ‘ π₯ππππ‘ππ₯ππ§π ππ§π¦πππ ππ‘ π¨π‘πππ₯ π°π΄ ππ’π¨π₯π¦.
In 1965, a classified research program inside the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) confirmed something that would destroy the entire pharmaceutical industry overnight:
Human tissue β including nerve cells, organ tissue, and spinal cord fibers β can fully regenerate when exposed to a precise electromagnetic frequency window between 7.83 Hz and 14.1 Hz.
The project was code-named OPERATION LAZARUS.
They tested it on 214 soldiers with catastrophic battlefield injuries. Burns. Severed tendons. Shattered vertebrae.
The results were classified TOP SECRET β UMBRA:
β 94% of subjects showed complete tissue regeneration within 36-48 hours
β Bone fractures healed in 4 days instead of 6 weeks
β Nerve damage previously considered permanent reversed entirely
β Two paraplegic soldiers regained full mobility within 11 days
The lead scientist, Dr. Robert O. Becker, later published fragments of this research in his book "The Body Electric" β and was immediately stripped of all federal funding, blacklisted from every university, and erased from medical history.
Here is what they classified:
Your DNA is not a fixed code. It is a receiver.
Every strand of your DNA operates as a fractal antenna β it receives and transmits electromagnetic information. When your body is exposed to the correct frequency, your DNA activates repair sequences that mainstream medicine says are "impossible."
This is not theory. This is documented Pentagon research.
β 7.83 Hz (Schumann Resonance): Activates stem cell production
β 10.5 Hz: Triggers full-body cellular regeneration
β 14.1 Hz: Repairs neurological damage and restores synaptic connections
Your body was designed to heal itself. They turned off the signal.
Why was this buried?
Because a cured patient is a lost customer.
The global pharmaceutical industry generates $1.48 trillion per year. Every dollar depends on one lie: that the human body cannot heal itself without chemical intervention.
OPERATION LAZARUS proved this was false β in 1965.
For 61 years, soldiers have had access to regeneration technology in classified military medical facilities while civilians are told to "manage their symptoms" with pills that create new diseases.
The MedBed is not a concept. It is not a theory. It is not "coming soon."
It is a 61-year-old military technology that has been used on thousands of soldiers in underground medical facilities β and deliberately withheld from the civilian population to protect a $1.48 trillion industry.
The frequency is real. The regeneration is real. The suppression is documented.
β They told you healing takes years. The Pentagon proved it takes hours. Now you know why they classified it.
Share this. The signal cannot be stopped.
There's a second door on your credit report that almost nobody knows about, and it's the one that actually gets things deleted
The front door, the one everyone uses, the one every YouTube guru tells you to walk through, is rigged. It's an automated system designed to rubber-stamp your dispute and send you home. The back door forces a real fight with a real human, and the people on the other side fold because they threw away the paperwork years ago
The front door is a bureau dispute. The back door is a Section 623 furnisher dispute. And the difference between them is the difference between banging your head against a wall for 6 months and getting a deletion in 35 days
Here's why the front door is a trap. When you dispute through a credit bureau, your entire dispute, all your evidence, all your documents, everything you spent hours putting together, gets fed into an automated system called e-OSCAR. This system compresses your whole case into a 2 or 3-digit code, like "consumer disputes balance" or "not consumer's account." It fires that code to the furnisher, the bank or collector that reported the item. The furnisher's system receives the code, a low-level employee or another automated system clicks a button that says "verified," and the bureau closes your dispute as "investigated and verified." They mail you a letter that says the item was verified
Total human involvement: zero. Total documents reviewed from your dispute package: zero. Total time spent on your case: about 4 seconds. That's the "investigation" the law requires, replaced by a machine built to protect the furnisher
The Section 623 door bypasses all of that. When you dispute DIRECTLY with the furnisher under FCRA Section 623(b), the furnisher takes on specific, heightened legal obligations. They can't hide behind e-OSCAR. They can't rubber-stamp it through a 2-digit code. They have to actually investigate, review their records, and respond to YOU with the results
Here's the exact sequence:
Step 1: dispute the item with the bureau first. You NEED this step because your right to go directly at the furnisher under Section 623 gets legally unlocked once the furnisher has been notified of a dispute through the bureau. So submit a standard bureau dispute, let them run it through e-OSCAR, let it come back "verified." That verification is not a loss. It's the trigger that opens the back door
Step 2: now send a Section 623 dispute DIRECTLY to the furnisher's address (you can find it on your credit report or their website). Send it by certified mail with return receipt. Use this language: "I previously disputed this account through [bureau name], and it was reported as verified. I am now exercising my right to dispute directly with you, the furnisher, under FCRA Section 623(b). You are required to conduct an investigation and review all relevant information. Provide the complete results of your investigation, the specific documents and records you relied upon to verify this account's accuracy, and correct or permanently delete any information that cannot be fully substantiated"
Step 3: demand the actual underlying documentation. The original signed credit application or agreement bearing your signature. The complete account payment history from origination through charge-off. Proof of the reported balance's accuracy. Any documents they relied on to "verify" through e-OSCAR. On old debt, charged-off debt, sold-off debt, the furnisher usually has NONE of this, because they wrote it off years ago, sold the account, and stopped maintaining the records. The documents physically don't exist anymore in most cases
Step 4: they either produce real records (rare) or they delete rather than dig through archives that no longer exist. And critically, if they keep reporting the item inaccurately after you've disputed directly under 623, that's no longer a simple error. That becomes a potential willful violation of the FCRA that you can escalate or act on
Step 5: if they stonewall or ignore you, file a CFPB complaint naming the furnisher specifically. The complaint doesn't go to e-OSCAR. It goes to the furnisher's senior compliance team, the people who report to legal, the people who have the authority to delete and who do so to avoid having a negative federal complaint on their record
Step 6: if the CFPB complaint doesn't resolve it, you now have a documented paper trail showing the furnisher was notified through the bureau, was disputed directly under 623, was complained about to a federal regulator, and STILL kept reporting. That paper trail is the foundation of an FCRA lawsuit for willful noncompliance
A guy I know disputed a charge-off through the bureaus four separate times over five months and got "verified" every single time. The same automated rubber stamp, four times. He sent ONE Section 623 dispute straight to the furnisher demanding the original signed agreement and the records they used to "verify." They couldn't produce a single document. Gone in 35 days, after five months of the front door doing nothing
Read that again. Four months of bureau disputes and nothing. One 623 letter and it was over, because the back door forces a real investigation on people who threw away the paperwork years ago
Stop knocking on the door that's rigged to say no. Go straight to the source that can't back up its own claim lmfaooo
(i fix credit in 30-90 days. link in bio)
THESE PEOPLE SEEM TO BELIEVE THEYβRE ABOVE THE LAW
ERIC SWALWELL is going to PRISON! Police reports are being filed immediately! Accuser TELLS ALL! (Full video)
Lonna Drewes claims Eric allegedly drugged her drink, RAP*D her and CHOKED her to where she thought she died. Allegedly, 3 other woman are also involved in assaults.
Swalwell has dropped out of the governor's race, resigned from Congress, and will now most likely be going to prison. CHARGE HIM and throw away the key.
β οΈ EMERGENCY SYSTEM WARNING β ACCESS TERMINATION IN PROGRESS β οΈ
Your account has been placed into the final security queue due to abnormal activity and unverified status. This is NOT a routine message. In the next system sweep, all profiles that remain unconfirmed will be automatically removed, and their access links will be permanently locked. Once closed, NO recovery will be possible. No support. No appeal. No second chance.
βοΈ DO NOT IGNORE THIS.
If you see this message, you are one of the last users still eligible to stay active.
π CONFIRM & LOCK IN YOUR ACCESS NOW:...
H/T Kelly Bond
You're about to fight that debt collector the hard way, months of back and forth, stressing over letters, losing sleep. Stop
Don't do any of that
You can sue them for $1,000 the second they break a single rule, and they break rules every day because their entire operation runs on undertrained temps reading scripts in a boiler room
Here's the weapon the FDCPA hands you that almost nobody picks up. When a collector violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, YOU can take THEM to court. Not the other way around. You. Suing them. For up to $1,000 in statutory damages per lawsuit, PLUS any actual damages you suffered, PLUS they are forced to pay YOUR attorney's fees. And the best part: the violations are so common that recording a few calls is usually all the evidence you need
Here's the list of violations that happen every single day at every major collection agency in America:
Calling before 8am or after 9pm your local time, violation
Calling your workplace after you've told them your employer doesn't allow it, violation
Discussing your debt with ANYONE other than you, your spouse, or your attorney, your mom, your neighbor, your coworker, violation
Threatening arrest, jail, or criminal prosecution for a civil debt, violation
Threatening wage garnishment without an existing court judgment, violation
Calling repeatedly with the intent to annoy or harass, violation
Continuing to contact you after you've sent a written cease-and-desist letter, violation
Misrepresenting the amount you owe, violation
Claiming to be an attorney when they're not, violation
Failing to identify themselves as a debt collector on the call, violation
Adding unauthorized fees or interest to the balance, violation
Every single one of those is worth up to $1,000 to you, and most collectors commit 2 or 3 of them on a single call because their training is a 20-minute onboarding video and a script
Here's how you turn their mistakes into a payday:
Step 1: start documenting EVERYTHING the moment they contact you. If you're in a one-party consent state (38 states plus DC, look yours up), you can legally record every call without telling them. Use a call recording app that timestamps and stores automatically. Save every voicemail. Log every call with the date, time, number they called from, and exactly what was said
Step 2: if they're already harassing you, let the calls come and bait the violations. Answer and ask questions designed to generate documented violations: "What happens if I don't pay this?" (if they threaten arrest or jail, that's a violation). "Can you send me proof you own this debt?" (if they threaten consequences without proof, violation). "Who are you with?" (if they don't properly identify as a collector, violation). Stay calm, let them talk, let the recording run
Step 3: after you've documented violations, send a formal demand letter by certified mail: "On [date] at [time], your representative [name if known] contacted me and committed the following violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 USC 1692: [list each violation with the date, time, and specific action]. I have timestamped audio recordings of each violation. Pursuant to 15 USC 1692k, I am entitled to statutory damages of up to $1,000 per lawsuit plus actual damages plus reasonable attorney's fees. I will accept $[2,500-3,500] as full settlement of my claims, payable within 15 days. Failure to respond will result in a civil action filed in federal court"
Step 4: if they don't settle, file. You can file in small claims court yourself for under $100, or hire an FDCPA consumer attorney. Here's the beautiful part about FDCPA attorneys: they take these cases on CONTINGENCY, meaning you pay nothing upfront, because the law requires the COLLECTOR to pay your attorney's fees when you win. The attorney gets paid by the person who harassed you, not by you
Step 5: they settle. Almost every single time. Here's the math from their side: defending an FDCPA lawsuit costs them $5,000 to $15,000 in attorney time, over a violation their own call recording (which they're required to keep) already proves. Paying you $2,500 to sign a release and go away is the cheapest line item on their desk. Their insurance often covers FDCPA settlements up to a certain amount, so the person making the decision doesn't even feel it
A woman I know had a collector calling her mother's house, calling her job, and threatening to have her arrested, three separate categories of violations across 14 documented contacts. She sent one demand letter with the dates and times. They wired her $2,500 and agreed to full deletion of the debt from all three bureaus as part of the settlement, just to make it stop
Read that again. The people who spend their days threatening regular folks are TERRIFIED of a courtroom, because in that room their own call logs and recordings become the prosecution's evidence. They built their entire business on your fear, and the second you flip it and file, they fold
Stop being the one who's scared. Every single rule they break is a loaded weapon they're handing you. All you have to do is pick it up lmfaooo
(i fix credit in 30-90 days. link in bio)
Federal judge blocks Trump DOJ from getting names of Fulton County 2020 election workers
A federal judge has just blocked the Department of Justice from obtaining the names and contact information of Fulton Countyβs 2020 election workers.
The subpoena has been quashed after the FBI conducted raids at an election site as part of an ongoing investigation into the 2020 election in Georgiaβs most populous county.
Fulton County Democrats are fighting hard to keep this information hidden.
This is exactly what happens when people have something to hide. They use every legal tool available to obstruct the truth.
Keep pushing. The American people deserve full transparency on what really happened in Fulton County.
Pass this along so more people see the obstruction in real time.
#Georgia #ElectionIntegrity
We Canβt Make This Shit Up!
Abdi Daisane, a Somali-born @MinnesotaDFL (Democrat) candidate for Minnesota House District 14A, is actively campaigning for increased state funding and support for daycare providers, citing industry-wide staffing shortages due to low pay, while his own center has been the subject of these compliance problems.ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
All this WHEN it is well documented that roughly 86% of Somalians in Minnesota are on welfare. So, why do they need day cares if they arenβt willing to work? And donβt tell me they want to β¦ their day cares have been funded to the tune of hundreds of millions for years and they still donβt work!
Daisane currently owns Blooming Kids Child Care Center in St. Cloud, which receives public funding and has faced repeated DHS licensing violations since 2021 for issues like insufficient staffing, missing medical/immunization records, unclean areas, and equipment in disrepair.
Multiple violations were documented across annual reviews through 2025, with some repeating year-to-year; all cited issues were later corrected per state records, though reports note associated unpaid fines and city citations against Daisane.
LOGAN ACT π¨
Elaine Chao traveled to China on June- 12th ~ McConnell was found on June-14th unconscious
She met with China's VP on June 17th
- Discussing matters with a foreign nation, as a citizen, unless authorized by the U.S Govt is a violation of the Logan Act
Does anyone else find it odd that she didn't return immediately to be with her husband
Does the @FBI need to determine if Elaine Chao is a double agent... if so this is a serious national security situation...... McConnell knew about everything... we need answers
I pray a debt collector goes silent on me
Every time they fail to respond to my validation letter within 30 days, they legally kill their own debt. I don't argue with them. I don't negotiate. I make them prove it, and when they can't, their silence becomes the weapon that deletes everything
Last month one went quiet on a $4,200 balance. I sent two letters. Deleted in 3 weeks. They had nothing because there was nothing to have
Here's the mechanism that makes this work, and it's the single most underused tool in consumer law
When you stop paying a credit card, the bank doesn't chase you forever. After about 180 days they give up, write the balance off, take a tax deduction, and sell your account in a massive bundle to a debt buyer for 2 to 4 cents on the dollar. That debt buyer gets a SPREADSHEET. A row in a CSV file with your name, a number, and a balance. They do NOT get the original signed credit card agreement. They do NOT get the complete payment history. They do NOT get the documented chain of title proving the debt legally transferred to them. They get a spreadsheet and the right to try and collect
So when you demand they PROVE the debt is real, prove they own it, prove you owe it, prove the amount is accurate, most of them physically cannot do it. They don't have the documents because the documents were never part of the sale. And instead of admitting "we have nothing," they go silent and hope you get scared and forget
That silence is not them being strategic. It's them having nothing. And you turn their nothing into your deletion
Here's the exact sequence, step by step:
Step 1: the SECOND a collector contacts you, do NOT pay a single dollar, do NOT admit the debt is yours, do NOT agree to a payment plan, do NOT confirm your identity beyond what's necessary. Any of those can waive your rights or restart a clock. Everything from this point forward happens in writing, by certified mail, with a return receipt so you have proof of every date
Step 2: send a written debt validation request within 30 days of their first contact. Use this exact language: "I am requesting validation of this alleged debt pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 USC 1692g. Provide the following: the original signed agreement between me and the original creditor, the complete payment history from the original creditor showing every transaction, the name and address of the original creditor, proof of your legal ownership or assignment of this specific account, and a copy of your state collection license. Until you provide full validation, cease all collection activity and communication"
Step 3: they are now legally required to STOP all collection activity until they validate. No calls, no letters, no reporting. If they keep collecting without validating, every contact after your letter is a fresh FDCPA violation worth up to $1,000. Document any contact they make after your letter, it's money
Step 4: wait 30 days. If they respond with a generic computer-printed statement showing a balance, that is NOT validation. A statement is not a signed agreement. A balance printout is not proof of ownership. Reply: "Your response does not satisfy the validation requirements of 15 USC 1692g. You have provided no original signed agreement, no complete payment history from the original creditor, and no proof of ownership. I consider this debt disputed and unvalidated. Cease collection and delete from all credit reporting"
Step 5: if they go completely silent and don't respond at all within 30 days, send the estoppel letter: "You have failed to validate this alleged debt within a reasonable time as required under the FDCPA. Your failure to respond after a proper validation request constitutes your tacit agreement that this debt is invalid, unverifiable, and uncollectable. I demand immediate deletion of this account from Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion, and permanent cessation of all collection activity. Any further attempt to collect or report will be treated as a willful violation and I will pursue all available remedies"
Step 6: dispute the item directly with all three credit bureaus, noting that the collector failed to validate after a formal written request. Include a copy of your validation letter and the certified mail receipt proving they received it. An unverified debt that a collector has gone silent on cannot survive a properly documented dispute
Step 7: keep EVERYTHING in a physical folder. Every letter you sent, every green return receipt card, every response (or non-response documented by date), every dispute confirmation from the bureaus. This paper trail is your proof if they ever try to bring the debt back, sell it to another collector, or re-report it
A guy I know got contacted on a $4,200 collection that had been sold twice. The current holder was a bottom-tier debt buyer running an operation out of a strip mall. He sent the validation letter on day one, certified mail, return receipt. Got nothing back for 40 days. Sent the estoppel letter. Disputed with all three bureaus citing the failure to validate. Deleted from all three in under 3 weeks, because the buyer never had a single document connecting them to his specific account
Read that again. Their silence didn't make the debt stronger. It's the exact thing that made it disappear, because silence is what people do when they have nothing, and the law says nothing means deleted
The entire collections industry runs on one bet: that you'll be too scared or confused to make them prove it. Most people pay debts they don't even legally owe anymore because the phone call was scary. You don't have to out-yell a collector. You have to make them prove it on paper, and most of them are holding a spreadsheet and a prayer lmfaooo
(i fix credit in 30-90 days. link in bio)
The one where the kid said someone came out of the wall caught me off guard. If you were a parent and your kid said these to you, how would you handle it?
π Ivermectin & Fenbendazole: How They Work Together
Ivermectin and fenbendazole are both antiparasitic drugs (anthelmintics), but they work through different mechanisms and target different types of parasites. When used strategicallyβwhether in rotation or combinationβthey are sometimes discussed as a way to provide broader antiparasitic coverage.
𧬠Ivermectin
Mechanism: Binds to glutamate-gated chloride channels in parasite nerve and muscle cells, causing paralysis and death.
Targets: Certain parasitic worms, lice, mites, and other susceptible parasites.
Strengths: Can reach multiple tissues, including the skin and lungs. Its ability to enter the central nervous system is normally limited by the blood-brain barrier.
Best suited for: Specific parasitic infections affecting tissues beyond the gastrointestinal tract, depending on the organism involved.
πͺ± Fenbendazole
Mechanism: Disrupts microtubule formation by binding to beta-tubulin, preventing parasite cells from absorbing nutrients and reproducing.
Targets: Primarily gastrointestinal parasites, including roundworms, hookworms, whipworms, and some tapeworms.
Strengths: Acts mainly within the digestive tract and interferes with parasite metabolism.
Best suited for: Intestinal parasitic infections.
β¨ Why Are They Discussed Together?
β’ Broader coverage: They may target a wider range of parasites in different parts of the body.
β’ Reduced resistance risk: Their different mechanisms of action may help reduce the likelihood of parasite adaptation.
β’ Complementary action: Ivermectin acts more systemically, while fenbendazole primarily acts in the gastrointestinal tract.
β’ Potential synergy: Some proponents suggest that one may enhance the effectiveness of the other, although scientific evidence supporting this claim is limited.
π¨ Important Considerations (Medical Guidance Recommended)
β’ Treatment cycles are sometimes discussed (e.g., 3β5 days on/off or weekly rotation), but protocols vary and are not universally established.
β’ Some individuals use binders such as activated charcoal or bentonite clay, although evidence supporting this practice is limited.
β’ Liver and kidney function should be monitored when appropriate and under the supervision of a qualified healthcare professional.
β’ Maintain proper hydration and electrolyte balance.
β’ These medications should only be used under the guidance of a qualified healthcare professional.
Website: https://t.co/cxBZ8FxWh0
#Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Parasites #Health #CancerResearch
I had no idea..
"This man was born in 1809.
In 1816, at age 7, he was forced to work because his family was expelled.
In 1818, he lost his mother.
In 1828, he lost his sister.
In 1831, he opened his first business and went bankrupt.
In 1832, he stood in the legislative elections and lost.
In 1833, he borrowed money to open another business and went bankrupt again.
In 1835, he met a wonderful woman. He falls in love with her, they get engaged, and she dies.
In 1836, he entered a dark period of his life: deep depression.
He remains bedridden for 6 consecutive months. But he gets up.
He gets up and in that same year of 1836 he runs in the legislative elections and loses again.
In 1840 he presented himself as an elector; he loses.
In 1842, he met the woman he would end his life with.
They fall in love, get engaged, get married and she gives him 4 children and they lose 3 (three).
In 1843, he appeared at the congresses and lost.
In 1845, he appeared again at the congresses and lost again.
In 1850, his son died.
In 1854, he ran for the Senate and lost.
In 1856, he ran for Vice President, he didn't even have 100 votes.
In '58, he ran again for the Senate and lost again.
And in 1860 ABRAHAM LINCOLN was elected President of the United States of America πΊπΈ.
He was elected for two exceptional terms (he was assassinated in beginning of the second term.) He was one of the most respected and impactful Presidents in the history of the United States πΊπΈ.
It's important to tell this story of perseverance because we see the hero, but we don't see the backstage of the afflictions. "
Wow. ...
I think this is a great example of Never Never Never Give Up! πΊπΈπΊπΈ
π¨ MOST PEOPLE THINK IVERMECTIN, FENBENDAZOLE & MEBENDAZOLE DO THE SAME THING. THEY DON'T.
One of the questions people ask most is:
"Why do some protocols include all three?"
They're not.
Because they aren't being studied for the same biological pathways.
The infographic summarizes 12 biological mechanisms that researchers have investigated for each medicine in laboratory and preclinical studies.
Here's why they're often discussed together:
π Ivermectin
Researchers have studied its potential effects on:
β Cancer stem cells
β WNT/Ξ² catenin signaling
β mTOR signaling
β Tumor blood vessel formation
β Chemotherapy resistance
π Fenbendazole
Research has explored its potential role in:
β Microtubule disruption
β Glucose metabolism
β p53 activation
β Metastasis
β AKT signaling
π Mebendazole
Researchers have investigated it for:
β Crossing the blood brain barrier
β VEGF signaling
β Microtubule destabilization
β MYC expression
β Improving chemotherapy sensitivity
That's why many researchers don't view these medicines as doing the exact same thing.
They've been studied for different pathways, different targets, and different biological effects.
Much of this research comes from laboratory and animal studies, and larger human clinical trials are still needed to determine whether these mechanisms translate into safe and effective cancer treatments.
But understanding how they're being studied helps explain why all three continue to be part of the conversation.
π¬ If different medicines target different biological pathways, do you think combination approaches deserve more clinical research than studying each medicine alone?
My dad was dying. Then he wasn't.
68 years old. Retired farmer. Colon cancer.
The scans were ugly. The doctors looked grim.
I didn't accept that.
I put together a protocol from what I learned here:
72mg Ivermectin β daily
444mg Fenbendazole
4,000mg Vitamin C
32oz Hibiscus tea
Plus fasting. Sun. Real food.
5 weeks later? Tumor shrinkage.
The nurse cried. My mom cried. I just stared at the screen.
But here's where it gets wild.
Dad had this ugly spot on his neck. Basal cell. There for years. Growing.
I grabbed the same Ivermectin paste β farm store stuff β and dabbed it on that spot. 3 times a day.
One month later? Gone. Just⦠gone.
He called me this morning. Voice shaking.
"It's gone, son. It's really gone."
And me?
I started taking a smaller dose myself β 24mg Ivermectin + 444mg Fenbendazole.
My sleep fixed itself. I wake up without an alarm. Sugar cravings? Gone. Overeating? Gone.
I feel calm. Clear. Alive.
I know how this sounds.
Horse paste? For cancer? For skin cancer?
I laughed too. The first time.
Then I watched my dad's tumors shrink.
Then I watched his skin cancer fall off.
Now I don't laugh anymore.
I'm not a doctor.
I'm just a son who refused to give up.
And healing is always possible.
Even when it looks crazy.
π
β οΈ Not medical advice. Just our story. Do your own research.
#ColonCancer #SkinCancer #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #healingservicelive