unintelligibleRabbit

just a dude trying to make sense of it all #Conservative #Canadian #TrudeauMustGo #TrudeauForTreason

[unintelligibleRabbit @monsterpockets1]

@dom_lucre “She” is actually a he and is only a model because of who “her” parents are

[ELIZABETH LANE @imelizabethlane]

I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is.

I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath.

What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain:

That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her.

Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.)

Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance.

Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity.

Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure.

Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power.

What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker.

Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride.

What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time.

In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks!

It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely!

Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing.

Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came.

What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion.

This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.

[unintelligibleRabbit @monsterpockets1]

@Tim_Banks @ChtownPE The other private mri machines cost $1800 which is out of reach for most islanders. Will your machine be more affordable if you truly want to help?

[Suffragent @Suffragent_]

WTF‼️Nick Shirley just shared this new video of Somali daycare fraud in Minnesota - apparently this one venue gets $3,000,000! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[NewsForce @Newsforce]

At least he took it like a man 🤷‍♂️

https://t.co/16kIAXvW8E

[Billboard Chris 🌎 @BillboardChris]

I’m on the ferry to Victoria to go see this documentary tonight.

One BC is the only political party in Canada telling the truth about the greatest hoax in Canadian history.

[Bruce McGonigal @bruce_mcgonigal]

🦅🪦🇨🇦 : Former Ottawa CBC Producer Dallas Brodie asks the BC NDP why the supposed Kamloops mass grave has not been dug up, to identify any dead children.

I agree with Dallas on this specific issue. If mass murder was committed we know people are still alive who ran these schools.

If there are child killers among us, potentially looking after kids today, we need to know and bring them to justice.

So why would anyone oppose finding the truth? If there are dead children, identifying who they are via DNA and how they died is critical.

Despite what the BC NDP claim, you can respectfully excavate a site & safely identify cause of death, if there is trauma like bludgeoning or a gunshot wound or being stabbed. Their DNA can be collected via samples like bone marrow, hair follicles etc.

Then those children's bodies, if they exist, can be respectfully reburied in a dignified manner and their suffering can be accurately recorded by history.

Any loving parent would want to know the truth and factually expose any harms that occurred by a government that took their children away.

The BC NDP oppose doing all of this because they're likely aware there is no mass grave and thus their entire PSYOPS would be blown.

As for Dallas Brodie, if she actually cared to stop all of this, she would not have left the Conservative party to get a massive $650K payoff to form OneBC & split votes.

John Rustad was quite open that not one child's body had been verified in any alleged mass grave. He was upset with Dallas Brodie for mocking survivors of Pierre Trudeau's 60s scoop. Which was not only unprofessional, it's evil.

We know thousands of children were abused via the 60s scoop in Residential schools & foster care. I witnessed such abuses during my time in the foster care system in the 80s.

It's undeniable that gross miscarriages of justice did indeed happen. It has quite literally been documented.

I believe in the 90s alone over 800 children died in the BC foster care system and I believe at the time only 2 of those deaths were investigated.

Pretty hard to find info on that now but if anyone has any access to old articles or news clips I would love to have access to them. I remember being horrified when I heard about it.

The BC NDP are rewriting history around child abuse in BC while they themselves are responsible for abusing, neglecting and putting children in harms way.

Something I posted about over the weekend, where a 12 year old girl was left on the streets of the ruthless DTES by her group home staff, the VPD and the Ministry responsible for her safety.

Remember folks, John Rustad was warning us about how First Nation land title claims were a threat to private property rights before & during the BC election.

All while OneBC MLAs Dallas Brodie & Tara Armstrong ran under his leadership, to win their seats.

Then those two left the party, refused to show up to a no confidence vote against Eby, when David said he wanted an election.

We now know why they didn't show up folks. Had an election been triggered, they would have lost and not gotten $650K to form OneBC, while using their two seats to promote a party to split votes which directly helps keep the BC NDP in power.

Dallas Brodie has been defending Pierre Trudeau's 60s scoop while using victims as her political punching bag. It's disgraceful and not helping anyone except the BC NDP and Dallas, who rakes in donations.

[Camus @newstart_2024]

He held his 9-year-old nephew’s hand as the brain scan loaded…

What appeared on the screen changed Dr. Daniel Amen’s life forever — and made him declare war on the psychiatric establishment.

A golf-ball-sized cyst had destroyed the boy’s left temporal lobe.

The same day this child drew himself hanging from a tree… and shooting other kids.

He hadn’t smiled in a year. Keep watching — it gets insane. ↓

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Nicole Shanahan (RFK Jr.’s former running mate) just said something that every European and American needs to hear right now:

“Progressives spend so much time turning conservatives and Christians into the enemy that we forget to think critically…
and when we finally do, we discover we actually have a TON in common.”

Then she issued a chilling warning that hits Berlin, Paris, London, and Warsaw, and Washington equally hard:

Today’s young progressives — full of genuine compassion and hope for a better world — are being manipulated in the exact same way her mother experienced during the rise of communism in China, and millions saw in Russia before totalitarianism took over.

They believed they were fighting for freedom and justice.
Instead, their empathy was weaponized to pave the way for authoritarian control.

Her exact words:

“Their empathy and compassion is being used for a fascist takeover… and they’ve been trained to see it as the exact opposite.”

This isn’t just an American problem.

From cancel culture to mass migration debates to digital censorship — the same playbook that divides people into warring tribes is running on both sides of the Atlantic.

The people aren’t the enemy.
The script that makes us hate each other is.

Watch the full clip.

If you care about real freedom — anywhere in the West — this will stop you in your tracks.

[Nedu @ned4short]

@RealCandaceO Posting here for those who don't have access to your Instagram stories.

Source:
https://t.co/mEOVej5sVl

[American AF 🇺🇸 @iAnonPatriot]

Elon Musk EXPOSES the homeless problem in California..

He’s SPOT ON.. 👏👏

[Jaimee Michell @JaimeeUSA]

Holy fuck this lesbian absolutely bodied “trad con” Andrew Wilson for marrying a woman with 3 baby daddies.

Damn I didn’t even know that til now 😭 What a fucking poser lmao

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a man this triggered in my life 💀💀💀

[✨ Lady Vet ✨ @CoVet_81]

Mic drop! He schooled them hard🎤💥

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

Joe Rogan show goes over the unfiltered truth about who the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy really is

🚨 US Taxpayers paid $5 billion dollars from the CIA and NSA, funneled through NGOs to get Zelensky elected. But it goes so much deeper

“Here's the truth, and people know parts of this story, but they don't know it in its cleanest narrative

So he was a totally apolitical, he was an outsider to politics, zero experience or interest in government or politics. He was a comedian and with no manifesto, no party ties

- He does a TV show, a planned TV show called Servant of the People. And the main character in the show does a YouTube video that calls out oligarchs and corruption, and eventually becomes popular and is drafted as a protest candidate and eventually becomes president.

- So Zelenskyy played on a TV show, a person who becomes president by popular demand. In real life, the TV show is supported by an oligarch named Kolomoyskyi, who owned the TV channel.

- And Kolomoyskyi did a huge non-stop promo on that TV show to make it the number one show, prime time slots and ads everywhere and crossovers with the news and what have you

- 2018, a year before the show goes off the air, Zelenskyy forms a political party called Servant of the People, the same title as the, as the show.

- No press release, secretly done, and then he does another season of the show, and in April of 2019, he announces his actual candidacy on Instagram.

- He has no campaign, no rallies, no real platform. He skips the presidential debates, others attended.

- He avoids press conferences and the few that he did were, in the beginning, were really bad. And Kolomoyskyi's TV channel gave Zelenskyy's campaign endless airtime and, favorable polls and went after his enemies.

- The US intelligence agency, CIA and NSA helped. U.S. spending $5 billion, by the way, on democracy campaigns in Ukraine funneled through NGOs.

- USAID embeds advisors in his organization to help with the campaign

- On election day, Zelenskyy wins with 73% of the vote

- Then the war happens with Russia, and he declares martial law and he ends elections.

There's supposed to be an election in 2024, that's what we get for our democracy money. And quite literally, he is an actor in a carefully designed television show.

He is a construct, like Epstein is a construct, meaning he's a created entity and it worked. That is Zelenskyy, American hero”

[Bruce @bruce_barrett]

The only type of orange shirts Canadian politicians should be wearing today.

[Bruce @bruce_barrett]

Happy Canada Hoax day everyone.

[Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful @kevinolearytv]

Canada is drowning in debt, and it didn’t all come from the pandemic. Trudeau and Freeland piled on billions more through sheer mismanagement. Now Mark Carney inherits the job from hell. Unless he cuts waste and unleashes our energy exports — natural gas, LNG, pipelines, we’ll stay stuck.

The math is simple: we could be making billions a month, just like Norway did decades ago. Instead, we’re broke. Carney’s only real path forward is to fix Canada’s debt mess with energy.

[John Curtis @Johnmcurtis]

@elonmusk I’ll have to update my video.

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

Lady just asked Ai what Charlie Kirk would say now in Heaven.

Who knew Ai could be so heartbreakingly moving….

[Frank McCormick @CBHeresy]

I was a public school teacher in the hood for 11 years, and I know this type of kid.

The type that would smack the kid sitting in front of him, tell the teacher “IDGAF” when corrected, and ruin an entire year’s worth of learning for the entire class.

His special education teachers would describe him as “actually very smart with a lot of potential,” despite him failing every class and scoring a 9 on the ACT.

There would be countless meetings with him and his mom and the social workers, psychologists , and principal would speak in soft voices and nod and smile when the kid told them he wants to be a “doctor.”

They’d design all sorts of ridiculous accommodations that give him ample room to behave however he wanted and terrorize his teachers and peers with minimal consequences.

Teachers would spend the entire class trying to reign in his behavior, and when they called security to remove him, they’d have to evacuate the entire class first.

He’d rarely receive any consequences. The principal would reprimand the teachers for “not building a relationship with him” and accuse them of “singling him out because he was black.” As a result, they’d give up and his behavior would escalate.

If he was really bad, he’d get a time out in a special room where he’d sit on his phone and tell the supervisor to “shut the fuck up” if they said anything. Maybe he’d have to partake in a “peace circle” if he became violent.

He’d eventually get “socially promoted” to his senior year and there would be a massive effort to get his credits recovered, mostly by pressuring teachers to give him alternative assignments and 50% for the work he didn’t do.

He’d walk down the graduation stage and everyone would cheer, and he’d probably do something embarrassing like give the finger to the audience.

As a young adult, he’d walk the city behaving exactly as he did in school because he’d been socialized to learn there are zero consequences for his behavior. Depending on the city, he’d probably get similar treatment from the cops and public afraid of creating a public scene that would lead to riots in their city.

One day, he’d snap, and do something like this.

And only then, would everyone act surprised, as if this wasn’t largely in part due to how our public schools negatively socialize and enable the behavior of animals that should be locked up or institutionalized as teenagers.