@Plinz Knowledge is a market, unfortunately. It’s the same pattern I’ve seen in other domains. And, to this matter, poor cybernetics has been constantly raped by different authors exploiting its basic model through different packages
@AndrewYNg I believe that before entering such a complex conversation we should do some information architecture in the conversation itself. This is a pattern we’ve already learned from decades of design work (BTW, I’m hinting at the fact that you are ultimately proposing a design convo).
@AGI_HeavenHell@ylecun Indeed. And when we speak about exponential growth we fall into the trap of seeing it as a curve (a line), when we should find ways to visualize it in a non-linear way, like dots saturating in a region, multiple lines playing together, or some representation that isn’t linear
@_florianmai @Artoftheproblem@pmddomingos@sama Statistics are useful because the predicted pattern either matches reality or is convincing. In other words, statistics doesn’t need to be true in order to be useful.
@_florianmai @Artoftheproblem@pmddomingos@sama Hasn’t Gestalt stated that (with different words) decades ago? 1) Take given patterns 2) Complete as you can
@FelixDelong Makes sense! (IMHO). If nature bets on recursiveness to scale (fractals) then the resulting design system should be high on homoiconicity (the data resembles the code which resembles the expression of the code)
@SignalsNSorcery I think those who might listen to synthetic music will probably be the same listening to Mood playlists today (user just looking for a background)