I used to think I could catch up to the cracked engineers I looked up to but with agents it seems a lot more unreachable
They produce more -> more mistakes -> more learning -> more improvement
I'm still 1-2 agent andy so feels further way while they're improving faster
@Jilles yeah or just have neovim spawn a pi when i submit
not sure if there’s a herdr cli command to open a new tab or pane and have it start pi and pipe in the comments
I can raise PRs if you’re open to contributions but it’ll be a big ux change
@Jilles I meant a lot more config through the plugin setup instead of .pi/nvim-review-template.md eg default mode when opening an annotate, disabling esc to close,
Would rather it be a normal buffer and :wq to save and close it and empty to cancel
@Jilles had a nice flow going where I open lazy git -> open changed file -> start bridge -> annotate
thanks for this, doing big refactors so sticking to codex for now but in my personal coding I'm still working on my pi setup and flow
@Jilles after a couple days use
1. the bridge is really annoying, need to either have pi launch nvim with it connected or when I submit in nvim it should launch pi agent with the annotations
2. qol: have keybindings + prompt configuration in the nvim plugin setup
@icanvardar keep starting adversarial agents until the first one is done 😂
I would prefer speed over intelligence now though
I've started to use pi just so I could swap out gpt models for deepseek v4 flash easily
@RhysSullivan@bot so should I sign up for cursor to use it or will something better come out soon? I mean cc did hold for almost a year before codex/pi/other harnesses were better
i feel really bad for suggesting claude code to my friend but in my defence this was at the start of the year and got 5.3 was barely a thing.. it’s all codex now and i’m trying to convince him to move his company to codex/cursor