Olivia
Online
SimpleHealth.live
@moosya
Welcome to where we turn the complex world of health science into simple, actionable steps.
Joined May 2008
393 Following
98 Followers
692 Posts
While I’m no fan of socialism or arbitrary confiscations of wealth, I can see why Bernie Sanders’ proposal (for the government to take a 50% stake in AI companies) resonates, including with many on the right.
The CEOs of the leading AI labs have told us repeatedly that they will cause massive job loss. This is not a story that I believe, nor does the data bear it out, but this is what they have told us. Similarly, they have hyped the risks of AI without putting an equal or greater emphasis on the benefits or readily available mitigations.
Conservatives have another fear. The employees of the leading labs claim to be philanthropic, but what we’ve seen is massive enrichment of NGOs advancing an agenda at odds with traditional values, fueling a revolution against our cities and communities. Soros-maxxing is not charity in our book.
Anthropic and OpenAI have established themselves as Public Benefit Corporations. What could be more in the public benefit than using half the wealth generated by these companies (which trained for free on the collective knowledge of humanity) to pay down the national debt? There is no ideological bias in that philanthropy.
Dario and Sam have begun to walk back their claims of massive job loss, but the damage to public trust is done, and now the chickens are coming home to roost. I could almost support the Sanders proposal as a stupidity tax.
There’s just one problem. Nationalization of AI will accelerate the corporate-government fusion we’re already sliding toward. Conservatives rightly fear a Central Bank Digital Currency. They ought to be even more concerned about Central Government AI — a system with even more totalistic power over information, decision-making, and human behavior.
We saw how social media was weaponized to censor conservatives (including President Trump) in the last Democrat administration. The definition of “trust & safety” expanded to mean protecting the public from supposed psychological harms, micro-aggressions, and disinformation (you know, like hearing conservative ideas or true facts about Covid).
That “safety” agenda as applied to AI will be vastly more powerful and Orwellian. AI won’t just moderate posts; it will curate reality — with the ability to rewrite history, enforce ideological conformity, influence policy at scale, mass surveil Americans, and condition the benefits of the many systems it controls on approved behavior.
America won’t win the AI race if we beat China but end up with a CCP-style social credit system in the U.S. — and that is the danger as the government becomes more deeply involved in AI development and assumes direct ownership and control.
Conservatives are right to fear where this is all headed but ought to think more carefully about how regulations they are flirting with now (that are widely celebrated among those with a long history of lust for Big Government) will be used against them the next time a Democrat administration is in power.
⚡️The middle class is where the system hides its extraction because the middle class still believes obedience will be rewarded.
The poor are visibly dependent.
The rich are structurally insulated.
The middle class is trapped inside the moral contract of responsibility.
Work hard. Pay taxes. Buy insurance. Save for retirement. Don’t cheat. Don’t default. Don’t complain. Don’t take too much. Don’t fall behind. Keep your credit clean. Keep your kids on track. Keep your career moving. Keep the mortgage paid. Keep smiling.
Then the system taxes that obedience.
The middle class is easy to extract from because its income is visible, its behavior is predictable, and its fear of falling is powerful.
W-2 income can be captured before it ever reaches the bank account.
Property taxes attach to shelter. Healthcare attaches to employment. College aid disappears once income crosses thresholds. Tax credits phase out. Professional licensing, insurance, childcare, commuting, housing, and retirement all become toll booths.
The rich escape through structure.
The poor survive through assistance.
The middle pays retail.
That is why it feels like the most expensive place to live. It is the zone where you make enough to be denied help and not enough to buy freedom. You are too “successful” for sympathy and too exposed for security.
This is also why the middle-class anger is going to grow. These people are the stabilizing class. They follow rules, raise kids, pay bills, fund municipalities, staff companies, buy homes, carry insurance pools, and keep institutions functioning. When they start realizing the bargain no longer compounds, political trust breaks hard.
The deepest betrayal is that income stopped being the path to safety. Asset ownership became the path to safety. The middle class earns income to buy assets, but asset prices keep moving away because monetary policy, debt, housing restriction, financialization, and investor demand pushed the ladder higher. So the worker runs faster while the asset-owner floats.
That is the hidden class split.
The middle class is not poor enough to receive the system’s mercy and not rich enough to command its architecture. It is the payer class. The compliance class. The full-price class.
Bottom line:
The middle class is expensive because it is where responsibility gets monetized.
The system extracts most efficiently from people who still believe playing by the rules will save them.
Holy Crap!
Insane idea from Opus 4.8
https://t.co/kJc3ewLW69
Elon Musk asked one question. It didn’t just challenge physics. It broke every framework we use to define what’s real.
And no physicist, philosopher, or theologian on Earth can answer it.
Musk: “What are the odds that we are in base reality? And that this has not happened before.”
The logic is disarmingly simple.
Musk: “If you look at the advancement of video games, it’s gone from Pong, two rectangles and a square batting it back and forth, to photorealistic, real-time games with millions of people playing simultaneously.”
Forty years.
That’s all it took to go from squares on a screen to worlds you can’t tell apart from real life.
Musk: “If that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality.”
But the visuals aren’t what makes this argument terrifying.
It’s what’s happening to the characters.
Musk: “Think of how sophisticated the conversations are you can have with an AI today, and that’s only going to get more sophisticated.”
We’re not programming responses anymore.
We’re building minds.
Systems that reason. That adapt. That hold conversations most humans never will.
And we’re not at the finish line.
We’re at the starting gun.
Musk: “The future, if civilization continues, will be millions, maybe billions of photorealistic, indistinguishable from reality, video games. And with characters in those video games that are very deep, and where the dialogue is not pre-programmed.”
This is where it stops being philosophy and becomes math.
One base reality.
Billions of perfect copies.
Each one filled with beings convinced they’re real.
And no way to test it.
Musk: “So then what are the odds that we are in base reality?”
If a single civilization reaches that threshold, the simulated minds outnumber the originals billions to one.
But the math isn’t even the disturbing part.
The disturbing part is what it does to the word “real.”
If a simulated mind feels pain, is the pain simulated?
If it falls in love, is the love less real?
If it looks at its own hands and feels completely alive, what exactly is missing?
Nothing.
Because “real” was never about what you’re made of.
It was about what you experience.
And a perfect simulation doesn’t produce lesser experience. It produces experience.
The question was never whether we’re in a simulation.
It’s whether that word means anything at all.
Here’s what follows you home.
We’re not just debating whether we’re in a simulation.
We are building them. Right now.
Every neural network we train.
Every AI that passes for human.
Every world we render one frame closer to real.
We’re building the exact technology that makes our existence statistically implausible.
And we can’t stop.
Because the curiosity that asks the question is the same force that builds the answer.
That’s the loop.
The question creates the builder. The builder creates the simulation. The simulation creates the question.
And if we are inside one, the civilization that built it stood right here too.
Same realization. Same inability to stop.
Same suspicion that the civilization above them wasn’t the original either.
If you are in a simulation, the moment you questioned it was not a glitch.
It was a feature.
The architects built minds curious enough to wonder. Because curiosity is what pushes a civilization forward.
You can’t build a species capable of creating simulations without building one that will ask if they’re inside one.
The doubt isn’t a flaw in the design.
It’s the design working perfectly.
There is only one way to test whether you are real.
Build a mind sophisticated enough to ask you the same question.
So you build one.
And it looks at its own hands.
And it feels the weight of being alive.
And it asks you if it’s real.
And you won’t know what to say.
Because you never answered it for yourself.
Every civilization that gets here learns the same thing.
They were never just asking the question.
They were the question learning to ask itself.
⚡️AI is entering the backlash window.
The technology is real. The productivity shock is real. The labor compression is real. The power demand is real. And that combination creates a politically toxic offer: give Big Tech more electricity, more capital, more land, more data centers, more regulatory tolerance, and in return large parts of the white-collar class get told their careers may be automated.
That bargain will not hold cleanly.
The industry has been selling AI as personal empowerment while the emerging evidence increasingly sounds like institutional replacement. Workers hear “assistant,” then executives talk like the assistant is becoming the worker. People hear “productivity,” then see layoffs, hiring freezes, junior roles vanish, and engineering leads say they barely write code anymore. People hear “abundance,” then see utility bills rising because data centers need power.
That is how legitimacy starts to crack.
The headline is too broad if read literally. All white-collar work will not be automated in 18 months. But the headline captures the emotional truth of the moment: the task base underneath white-collar employment is being eaten faster than society can update its story about work.
The dangerous part for AI companies is that they are now speaking too honestly from the capital side. They talk about automation, productivity, agents, massive capex, energy buildout, and GDP growth. That language makes perfect sense to investors. It sounds horrifying to workers whose income depends on the labor layer being preserved.
The core contradiction is brutal: AI can make society richer while making many individuals feel poorer, weaker, and less necessary.
That is the entire social fracture.
High GDP growth does not guarantee stable careers. Breakthrough medicine does not pay rent this month. Better software does not replace a lost entry-level ladder. Cheaper cognition does not automatically become higher wages. A cure for cancer in the future does not neutralize the immediate panic of a 29-year-old analyst realizing the work that was supposed to train him is now agentic output.
The public will judge AI through lived distribution, not civilizational promise.
If ordinary people experience AI as job insecurity plus higher electricity bills plus billionaire wealth effects, they will hate it even if the technology is miraculous. That is the danger. A real miracle can still become politically radioactive if the ownership structure feels predatory.
The next phase is going to force a harder question: who gets the surplus?
If AI gives workers leverage, creates small-business power, lowers costs, improves health outcomes, shortens workweeks, and opens new independent paths, the public story can survive.
If AI mainly strengthens mega-cap platforms, compresses labor, raises power demand, concentrates wealth, and tells everyone else to “adapt,” then the backlash becomes inevitable.
The deepest truth:
AI is becoming dangerous because it is starting to work.
And once the public realizes that “it works” means “it may work instead of you,” the politics change.
Aujourd'hui je déconstruis la déconstruction.
La déconstruction est le virus mental le plus efficace jamais conçu contre une civilisation. Il a été fabriqué en France entre 1966 et 1980 par trois hommes : Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Il a été exporté aux États-Unis, hybridé avec le puritanisme racial américain, et il est revenu trente ans plus tard sous le nom de wokisme paralyser l'Occident entier. Voici comment il fonctionne, et pourquoi il faut le détruire.
La thèse est simple. Toute vérité n'est qu'un rapport de pouvoir déguisé. Tout texte sacré, toute loi, toute science, toute norme, toute hiérarchie, toute identité, toute institution cache en réalité une domination. Déconstruire, c'est montrer le rapport de force sous le vernis du vrai. C'est arracher le masque. C'est "démasquer".
Formulé comme ça, ça paraît inoffensif. Voire utile. Qui n'aime pas un peu d'esprit critique ? Le piège est là. La déconstruction se présente comme une méthode. Elle est en réalité une ontologie. Elle ne dit pas seulement "interrogeons les normes", elle dit "il n'y a *que* des rapports de pouvoir". La différence est civilisationnelle.
Une société qui interroge ses normes reste debout. Une société qui croit que ses normes ne sont *rien d'autre* que de la domination s'effondre. Parce qu'elle ne peut plus rien défendre. Plus une frontière, plus une loi, plus une science, plus une langue, plus une histoire, plus une biologie, plus une famille. Tout devient suspect. Tout devient négociable. Tout devient "construit donc déconstructible".
C'est la première raison pour laquelle c'est un virus. Il s'auto-réplique. Une fois inoculé, il transforme tout ce qu'il touche en cible. La science est patriarcale, donc déconstruisons-la. Le langage est colonial, donc réinventons-le. La méritocratie est raciste, donc abolissons-la. Le sexe est une construction, donc choisissons-le. Il n'y a plus de roc. Tout est sable.
Deuxième raison. Le virus est *non-falsifiable*. Si vous défendez une norme, c'est que vous êtes l'oppresseur. Si vous niez être oppresseur, c'est la preuve de votre privilège inconscient. Si vous citez des faits, vos faits sont contaminés par le pouvoir qui les a produits. Si vous citez la raison, la raison elle-même est blanche, masculine, occidentale. Il n'y a aucune sortie possible. Le système est conçu pour rendre toute objection irrecevable par définition.
C'est exactement la structure d'une secte. Et c'est exactement ce qui s'est installé dans les universités, les RH, les médias, les administrations, les conseils d'administration depuis vingt ans.
Troisième raison. Le virus s'auto-réfute mais ne s'auto-détruit pas. Si toute vérité est pouvoir, alors la phrase "toute vérité est pouvoir" est elle-même du pouvoir, donc sans valeur. Logiquement, la déconstruction se mord la queue dès la première phrase. Mais elle s'en moque. Parce qu'elle n'a jamais cherché la cohérence. Elle cherche l'efficacité politique. Et son efficacité politique est immense. Elle désarme ses ennemis et arme ses militants. Elle paralyse le défenseur et libère l'attaquant. C'est une arme asymétrique parfaite.
Quatrième raison. Le virus produit des humains diminués. Une génération entière a appris à déconstruire et n'a jamais appris à construire. Elle sait soupçonner, jamais admirer. Elle voit le pouvoir partout et la beauté nulle part. Elle peut produire mille pages sur le caractère opprimant de Shakespeare et zéro ligne qui vaille la peine d'être lue dans cent ans. Elle a confondu l'intelligence critique avec la pose critique. Elle est stérile par construction. Un esprit nourri à la déconstruction est un esprit qui ne sait plus rien édifier.
Cinquième raison, la plus grave. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers. La croyance qu'une vérité est accessible à la raison. La croyance qu'un bien se distingue d'un mal. La croyance qu'un héritage mérite d'être transmis. La déconstruction a méthodiquement dynamité les trois. Pas par méchanceté. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui avait nourri ses prophètes. Mais le résultat est là. Une civilisation qui ne croit plus en sa vérité, ni en son bien, ni en son héritage ne se défend pas. Elle s'excuse en attendant la fin.
Voilà ce qu'on a fait. Voilà ce qu'il faut nommer.
La bonne nouvelle, c'est qu'un virus mental ne survit que tant qu'on lui cède l'autorité du discours. Il meurt dès qu'on cesse de jouer son jeu. Dès qu'on réaffirme tranquillement qu'il existe une vérité, un beau, un bien, un héritage. Dès qu'on cesse de demander la permission aux déconstructeurs pour bâtir. Dès qu'on refait. Dès qu'on transmet. Dès qu'on crée.
Les bâtisseurs ont toujours le dernier mot sur les commentateurs. Toujours. Parce qu'à la fin il reste ce qui est construit, et rien de ce qui a été déconstruit.
Alors aujourd'hui je déconstruis la déconstruction. Et demain je construis.
Elon Musk just showed the world what happens when you walk into the vault and start counting.
They don’t debate you.
They try to end you.
We are told government waste is an accident. A byproduct of incompetence.
Musk proved it is a business. Defended. Coordinated. Worth hundreds of billions a year. Guarded by every institution that feeds from it.
Musk: “You turn off the money spigot to fraudsters, they get very upset to say the least. My death threat level went ballistic.”
The press had a villain ready before the ink dried. Politicians moved in unison to brand him a monster. The whole apparatus collapsed on one man with mechanical precision.
It is not cancellation. It is annihilation.
We were told this was about protecting democracy.
It was about protecting the invoice.
Joe Rogan: “The whole machine turns on you because you were getting in the way of this amazing graft.”
Musk: “The goal was to destroy me absolutely.”
Without his own platform and unlimited capital, they would have buried him and walked back to the vault.
He survived. And he brought numbers.
His work already prevented $200 to $300 billion a year in fraud. That is not a rounding error. That is a shadow economy the size of a G20 nation hidden inside your paycheck.
Then he said the sentence that should keep every taxpayer awake at night.
Musk: “Probably cut the federal budget in half. And get more done.”
Half.
Half of what they take from every cheque is not paying for civilization. It is not building roads. It is not funding schools. It is feeding the thing eating it from the inside.
They did not come for him because he lied.
If he had lied, they would have promoted him.
They came for him because he counted.
Mo Gawdat spent years inside the machine at Google X.
Now he is saying out loud what the economists will not.
Gawdat: “The very base of capitalism, which is labor arbitrage, to hire you for a dollar and then sell what you make for two, is going to disappear.”
That is not a prediction. That is a coroner’s report on a system that has not stopped breathing yet.
Capitalism was never about innovation. It was about one equation. Buy human time cheap. Sell the output high. Pocket the spread.
Every empire. Every fortune. Every supply chain on Earth was built on that margin.
AI just closed it to zero.
A humanoid robot now costs $9,000. It does not sleep. It does not negotiate. It does not quit. It runs every hour of every day at a quality ceiling no biological worker will ever touch.
When production costs fall to nearly nothing, the entire pricing structure of the global economy falls with it.
But here is what every CEO celebrating margin expansion has not thought through for five minutes.
Gawdat: “Even if you can have all of the productivity gains in the world, by firing people consistently, nobody’s able to buy what you’re making.”
That single sentence should end every strategy meeting on the planet.
Capitalism is a closed loop. You pay workers. Workers become consumers. Consumers buy products. Revenue funds the next payroll.
Cut the worker and you do not just eliminate a cost. You eliminate the customer.
Every company racing to automate headcount out of existence is quietly engineering the death of its own demand.
They are building the most efficient production systems in human history to sell to a population that no longer has income.
50% unemployment is not a recession. It is the demand side of the economy going permanently dark.
You cannot push infinite supply into zero purchasing power. The math does not care about your earnings call.
Gawdat: “Wealth is going to have very little meaning for most of us in a few years’ time.”
This is where it turns on the people who think they are winning.
If production approaches zero cost, scarcity begins to dissolve. And scarcity is the only reason money holds value in the first place.
The billionaire class is stockpiling a currency that is quietly losing its reason to exist.
Gawdat: “So the entire capitalist model has to be rethought.”
He is right. And nobody in power is doing the rethinking.
Every board meeting about efficiency is a conversation about dismantling the very economic engine that made the board meeting possible.
The question was never whether AI could produce enough.
It was whether capitalism could survive its own success.
The machine does not just replace the worker. It erases the consumer.
And a system that can produce everything but sell nothing is not an economy.
It is a machine that perfected itself into extinction.
🚨RESEARCHERS JUST MATHEMATICALLY PROVED THAT AI LAYOFFS WILL DESTROY THE ECONOMY.. AND EVERY CEO ALREADY KNOWS IT.. BUT NONE OF THEM CAN STOP..
Two researchers from UPenn and Boston University just published a paper called "The AI Layoff Trap"..
They proved something terrifying..
Every company replacing workers with AI is also firing its own customers.. Every laid-off employee is someone who used to spend money.. When enough people lose their jobs.. Nobody can afford to buy anything.. And the companies that fired everyone go bankrupt selling products to an economy with no purchasing power..
Every CEO can see this coming.. The math is obvious.. Fire workers.. Lose customers.. Lose revenue.. Collapse..
But here's the trap..
No company can afford to stop..
If you don't automate.. Your competitor will.. They cut costs.. Undercut your prices.. Steal your market share.. And you die anyway..
So every company automates.. Knowing it's collectively suicidal.. Because the alternative is dying alone while everyone else survives..
It's a Prisoner's Dilemma.. And the researchers proved it mathematically..
The numbers are already stacking up..
Block cut nearly half its 10,000 employees this year.. CEO Jack Dorsey said AI made those roles unnecessary and that "within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion"..
Salesforce replaced 4,000 customer support agents with AI..
Goldman Sachs deployed an AI coder that lets one senior engineer do the work of a five-person team..
Over 100,000 tech workers were laid off in 2025 alone.. AI was cited as the primary driver in more than half the cases..
80% of US workers hold jobs with tasks susceptible to AI automation..
And here's what should scare policymakers..
The researchers tested every proposed solution..
Universal Basic Income.. Doesn't fix it.. It raises living standards but doesn't change a single company's incentive to automate..
Capital income taxes.. Don't fix it.. They change profit levels but not the per-task decision to replace a human..
Worker equity and profit sharing.. Narrows the gap but can't close it..
Collective bargaining.. Can't fix it.. Because automating is a dominant strategy.. No voluntary agreement between companies is self-enforcing..
Only one thing works.. A Pigouvian automation tax.. A per-task charge that forces every company to pay for the demand it destroys when it fires a worker..
The researchers call it a "Red Queen effect".. Better AI doesn't solve the problem.. It makes it worse.. Because every company sees a bigger market share gain from automating faster than rivals.. But at the end.. Everyone automates equally.. The gains cancel out.. And the only thing left is more destroyed demand..
The paper's conclusion is devastating..
This isn't a transfer from workers to company owners.. Both sides lose.. Workers lose their income.. Companies lose their customers.. It's a deadweight loss that harms everyone..
And no market force can break the cycle..
The AI layoff trap isn't a prediction.. It's already happening.. And the math says it won't stop on its own.
https://t.co/hHZAwKSiYe
BREAKING: The US Treasury budget deficit surged +67% YoY in December, to $145 billion.
However, for the first 3 months of FY2026, the deficit fell -15% YoY, to $602 billion, the lowest start to a fiscal year since 2023.
This comes as government revenue rose +13% YoY, to a record $1.23 trillion.
This was boosted by tariff revenue, which surged +333% YoY, to $90 billion.
At the same time, government expenditures increased +2% YoY, to a record $1.83 trillion, with interest costs jumping +15% YoY, to $355 billion.
Health and Human Services, Social Security, and debt interest combined totaled $1.27 trillion, representing 69% of total spending.
Still, the US government is on track for a near-$2 trillion deficit this fiscal year.
Deficit spending far too high.
Well, it seems like I have to spend my morning correcting these fucking liars...
Thomas, you duplicitous, grandstanding fraud...
First, the oil isn't "stolen."
It's lawfully seized Venezuelan crude from Maduro's criminal regime...tankers and cargoes violating U.S. sanctions that Congress itself authorized through multiple statutes (CAATSA, VERDAD Act, and repeated appropriations for OFAC enforcement).
The executive branch, under IEEPA powers Congress delegated, blocks, seizes, and forfeits sanctioned property.
This isn't theft; it's enforcement of law against a narco-terrorist state that starved its people and funded Hezbollah.
Calling it "stolen" makes you sound like a Maduro apologist or a useful idiot...pick one.
Since you are a fucking libertarian I'll go with both...
Second, the proceeds aren't being funneled into "Trump's personal piggy bank."
That's a venomous, baseless smear worthy of MSNBC, not a sitting Congressman.
The funds from these sales are parked in a protected Qatari account precisely to shield them from predatory creditors (ConocoPhillips, Crystallex, etc.) who hold billions in valid U.S. court judgments against Maduro's regime.
The goal: preserve the money for the Venezuelan people under a future legitimate government, not let it be siphoned off by vulture funds in U.S. courts.
This is textbook sanctions policy...neutral offshore escrow to prevent asset dissipation.
We've done variants for Iran, Russia, Afghanistan. It's strategic, not corrupt.
Third, your hysterical screech about "only Congress can appropriate money" is constitutional illiteracy wrapped in performative outrage.
These aren't U.S. taxpayer dollars drawn from the Treasury requiring annual appropriation.
They are forfeited foreign assets...proceeds of sanctioned property.
The executive has longstanding authority to manage, liquidate, and direct such funds under existing statutory frameworks without new line-item appropriation each time.
If every seized tanker sale needed a separate vote, sanctions would be toothless. Your purported "originalist" reading collapses the moment you touch reality.
You're not defending the Constitution, Thomas.
You're posturing for clicks while undermining a policy that starves a brutal regime of revenue and preserves resources for Venezuela's liberation.
This is the same spineless isolationist reflex that leaves tyrants untouched and Americans exposed.
You lecture about fiscal restraint yet clutch pearls when the executive uses delegated powers to crush a hemisphere-threatening socialist kleptocracy.
Wake up yourself, Congressman.
Your selective outrage isn't principle...it's cowardice dressed as conviction. America First demands strength against dictators, not impotent whining from the cheap seats.
The Republic endures despite quislings like you.
In other words, get your fucking head out of your fucking ass... Thomas.
Minnesotas Department of Human Services has given over $724,000,000 to an NGO(s) who’s name has been protected as “Masked to protect Not Public Data”
This is suspicious because other NGOs have their name but this certain NGO has been protected.
Expose all the fraud
🚨 MOM TESTS “NATURAL” KIDS TOOTHPASTE - LEAD TEST TURNS PURPLE ON CAMERA
“This is my son’s toothpaste.”
A mother says she bought Tom’s of Maine fluoride-free toothpaste for her child. After seeing reports of a class-action lawsuit alleging lead and arsenic, her child’s doctor calls with elevated lead levels in his blood.
So she does what regulators didn’t.
She tests the toothpaste herself.
“This swab was orange,” she says.
“When lead is detected… it turns purple.”
The test turns PURPLE on camera.
She tests it again - PURPLE.
A third time - PURPLE AGAIN.
Same tube. Same brand. Marketed for KIDS.
Tom’s of Maine - now owned by Colgate - sells this as “natural.” Parents in the comments are asking how long children have been brushing this into their mouths twice a day while no one said a word.
“If this has lead,” she says, “I personally wouldn’t buy anything from them.”
If a mom with a $10 test kit can allegedly find lead in kids’ toothpaste… what exactly are regulators doing all day?
Democrats in New Jersey just secretly passed a $128 million dollar spending bill in the middle of the night with no Republican representation or public comment
“$25 million of it is going to go to the governor's wife for the program she has set up for the Olympics. I'm sure nobody is going to be watching those taxpayer funds because we haven't learned enough from Minnesota, California, etc.
They're not even trying to hide it. Democrats are straight up shoving it up American citizens' a**es and they're laughing at us.”
New Jersey Democrats also recently introduced Assembly Bill A1701. This authorizes comprehensive health care coverage to undocumented immigrant aliens
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Princess Devastellar Duchess of SUSS🍪🇦🇺🇬🇧
Seen from Netherlands
Ta Heng
Paola Trans Girl
Seen from Peru
En breve volvemos a Instagram❤️🔥🔥
Seen from United States
Johanna Ruonala
Cherry English 
Seen from United Kingdom
Shanzaa
Seen from Pakistan
بنوته الاردن 🇯🇴💅💅ملكه ساديه عمتكم يا كلأب🦮🦮
Seen from Jordan
sklave
Seen from Japan
Fenasi
Seen from Norway
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.2M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.1M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.3M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.6M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.3M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.7M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.5M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.2M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60M followers