Missis Mopp

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@Queefbeef4 @TruthAnswersAll It has not been proven .

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@ThrillaRilla369 You’re wrong. Watch the trial from day one and then come back and comment. The whole trial was based on “Patrick said” “Patrick told me” “Patrick informed me” from the prosecution witnesses; too many unanswered questions; it should have been investigated properly from the start.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@wurd4343 @Pajegetc @TradAdvocate Says the retard who obviously hasn’t watched any of the shit show of a trial. There are too many “witnesses” for the prosecution who’s only “evidence” comes from what Patrick said. There is too many unanswered questions.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@Pajegetc @TradAdvocate You too! It’s possible he killed those children before he went out ; there are so many inconsistencies in this whole shit show is a trial; you would know that if you actually watched it , which I doubt you have.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@AllMarmite @TheBritishIntel @GoodwinMJ @andyburnham @GBNEWS Even Farage? Is he equal ?

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@Cold_Comfort7 @equine202025 @ininghe_ Perhaps you should listen to the trial from day one . There is no forensic evidence linking her to the crime; expert witnesses for the prosecution admitted under oath that she was informed she had killed them because she had no memory.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@LynneShasta40 @realMarkMoney @hell_line0 You have not followed the trial from day one. There’s expert witnesses from the prosecution for the commonwealth who admitted under oath that “she had no memory and was informed of what happened” stop getting info from TikTok. They took what Patrick Clancy said and ran with it.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@FriendlyJerkman @RickGenie @YoungBobRB Did you watch the full trial? I suggest you do. Expert witnesses for the prosecution said she had no recollection of what happened when she woke up, she was informed of what she had done. There’s a reason there was not guilty plea in the options.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@Daisy_Dook @YoungBobRB Unless you have watched her trial from day one I suggest you zip it.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@realMarkMoney @hell_line0 And there’s no forensic evidence linking her to murder. She was informed she had killed them when she woke up because she had no memory. That statement came from an expert witness for the prosecution.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@The_AngloSaxon @sommerset20 @NoToMisogyny @iamthelmalouise He admitted he had doubt but still wanted to say she was guilty ; so you don’t understand “ beyond reasonable doubt”. This was from the judge. So you disagree with the law? Any doubts at all and he shouldn’t say guilty.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@metalsweet89 @D96319284Dan @neilgorestore She had no memory when she woke up , she was informed what she had done . If you watched the trial rather than looking on tik tok you would see there’s lots of unanswered questions.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@neilgorestore @PatrioticX_er If you watched the trial you would see there are too many unanswered questions about the whole situation. There’s no actual forensic evidence to say she is guilty. Justice is about finding the truth not just believing what the msm say.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@sommerset20 @NoToMisogyny @iamthelmalouise The juror admitted to having reasonable doubt but still wanted a guilty plea; he wasn’t following the law as the judge instructed. He deserves to be judged.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@leverngroyper @ShaeKStephenz @LionelMedia She had no memory of it when she woke , she was informed of what had happened. She admitted to cutting the screen on the windows but yet the screen wasn’t cut. It’s not proven beyond reasonable doubt so no she doesn’t deserve to die. He should have been investigated as well.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@JoshWalkos @LionelMedia So you didn’t listen to the trial from day one? There is zero forensic evidence she killed them; it was a botched shit show from day one.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@jmugica2003 @sarahdactyl123 @hell_line0 She was told what had happened, she was told she did it. There was no proper investigation because the incompetent police force took Patrick’s account as the gospel truth. The trial was a total shit show. They cannot prove her guilty beyond all reasonable doubt.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@SCassaday @BriskAutumnMoon @bennyjohnson As a woman, I find it abhorrent that 11 out of 12 jurors cannot find her guilty beyond reasonable doubt but you as a bystander are willing to dismiss this: justice is also finding out the truth and there was too many discrepancies in this shit show to prove she was guilty.

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@MsEsmee67 @DaveRom86052473 @TrumpDailyPosts @grok You are just repeating what her husband has said. The whole investigation was botched from the beginning, there’s a reason the jury can’t agree on “beyond reasonable doubt” perhaps watch the whole trial from day one; too many discrepancies. Justice is about finding the truth also

[Missis Mopp @mopp12885]

@MySoulisRussian @benonwine You said they are Roma and not slavakian or Romanian because Roma are Indian. That is a false statement, Roma may have originated from India there are also Slovak and Romanian Roma, my husband is Romanian and has many Roma friends.