Mohammad Qaiser @moqaiser - Twitter Profile

Pinned Tweet

about 2 months ago

Anthropic should stop beating around the bush and commit to releasing Mythos, instead of building unnecessary hype around it. Claude Opus 4.6 is good, but still a long way from where @AnthropicAI and the Vibe Coding community need it to be. Here is where things stand with all the throttling and Opus nerfing debacle: 1. The usage limits are brutal. I hit the $200 Max plan weekly limit within 2 days of heavy usage. I have never hit the same even with 7-days of heavy usage. On the 12th April, Claude was essentially unusable for a few hours. As a gesture, Anthropic offered $200 in bonus credits, presumably because they knew the throttling was aggressive and Claude was playing dumb. 2. The bonus credits are not the relief they sound like. Today, Claude spent nearly $100 attempting to fix a single bug. I am now on the second bug, and it will likely exhaust the remaining credits just during the audit and planning phase. So until my limit resets, my options are to sign up for a second plan or sit idle on my project entirely. 3. The "fraction of the cost" argument does not hold up. Yes, Anthropic gives access to more compute at a fraction of the API cost. But it conveniently ignores the vendor lock-in and infrastructure adoption happening on Anthropic's terms. If the goal is to throttle models and reduce limits, the honest move would be to ship a model that actually justifies the cost per task, not one that burns $100 fixing a lightweight bug. Instead, this looks like softening users up for a Mythos launch priced at 2x Opus or more. That is what all this hype is quietly building toward. Stop performing transparency while withholding it. Stop acting above criticism while paying customers hit walls mid-project. If you want loyalty, earn it by actually caring about the people funding your roadmap. All of these daily releases mean nothing if the underlying core behind it is not even usable. @trq212 @DarioAmodei

$moqaiser's tweet photo. Anthropic should stop beating around the bush and commit to releasing Mythos, instead of building unnecessary hype around it. Claude Opus 4.6 is good, but still a long way from where @AnthropicAI and the Vibe Coding community need it to be. Here is where things stand with all the throttling and Opus nerfing debacle: 1. The usage limits are brutal. I hit the $200 Max plan weekly limit within 2 days of heavy usage. I have never hit the same even with 7-days of heavy usage. On the 12th April, Claude was essentially unusable for a few hours. As a gesture, Anthropic offered $200 in bonus credits, presumably because they knew the throttling was aggressive and Claude was playing dumb. 2. The bonus credits are not the relief they sound like. Today, Claude spent nearly $100 attempting to fix a single bug. I am now on the second bug, and it will likely exhaust the remaining credits just during the audit and planning phase. So until my limit resets, my options are to sign up for a second plan or sit idle on my project entirely. 3. The "fraction of the cost" argument does not hold up. Yes, Anthropic gives access to more compute at a fraction of the API cost. But it conveniently ignores the vendor lock-in and infrastructure adoption happening on Anthropic's terms. If the goal is to throttle models and reduce limits, the honest move would be to ship a model that actually justifies the cost per task, not one that burns $100 fixing a lightweight bug. Instead, this looks like softening users up for a Mythos launch priced at 2x Opus or more. That is what all this hype is quietly building toward. Stop performing transparency while withholding it. Stop acting above criticism while paying customers hit walls mid-project. If you want loyalty, earn it by actually caring about the people funding your roadmap. All of these daily releases mean nothing if the underlying core behind it is not even usable. @trq212 @DarioAmodei$

1

2

1

2

208

Mohammad Qaiser

@moqaiser

Who to follow

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users