cubicx

[cubicx @morenmb]

@nachomdeo No me extrañaría que lo que quitan a los buenos, se lo dan a los malos.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@AlexBaks82 Pericles Namorado

[cubicx @morenmb]

@HamskyHbb A lady in her 70's that is technology savvy? ha ha.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@Itssan17 I don't know. I don't see the suits admitting they were wrong. The ZSJL evidenced how inept and greedy they are. Before that I thought it was just fanboy conspiracies.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@SpyralRecords @Itssan17 Like they told Gal Gadot that WW3 was happening.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@shadeheffa @Asmodaeus666 My daughter claimed she is bilingual in her resume and during an admission interview for an Ivy League school,the interterviewer switch to Spanish and was impressed with her language skills. She is a senior at U Penn.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@BuckSexton And avoided an adulterer, corrupt, pedophile protector, that prefered traveling to Europe with his mistress than campaigning for the position he lost.

[Ethical American @AmericanEthical]

BREAKING: HOLY SMOKES! Democrats now control enough states to effectively abolish the Electoral College through the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.

Republicans did NOT have this on their bingo cards...

Under the Constitution, states control their electoral votes and are allowed to decide how they are allocated during presidential elections. Currently, almost every state gives its votes to whoever wins the state.

In practice, the current system means that a candidate can win the national popular vote, but lose the election because small states like Wyoming exert undue influence on the outcome. That state has 3 electoral votes with a population of just 577,000 people. California has 54 electoral votes and a population of 39.5 million people. So a vote in Wyoming is essentially 3.8 times as valuable as one in California.

Since 1992, Democrats have won the popular vote seven out of nine times.

Under the NPV, states that join agree to give their electoral votes to whoever wins the national popular vote, not just their own state. So a state could go red on the map, but if the Democrat wins the national vote, they still get that state's votes. And vice versa of course.

The crucial mechanism is that the compact doesn't trigger until the member states have a combined power of at least 270 electoral votes, the number needed to win the White House. So far, 18 states plus D.C. have joined, totaling 222 electoral votes. We only need 48 more.

Now is the chance to pass this measure in every state possible. Democrats won both houses of the legislature in Wisconsin for the first time in 18 years (10 electoral votes). We won the Pennsylvania state Senate for the first time since 1993 (19 votes). We now have a trifecta in Michigan (15 votes). And we won the governor’s race in Nevada (6 votes).

10 + 19 + 15 + 6 = 50.

222 + 50 = 272.

And if we hold our lead in the Arizona Senate, that number could climb as high as 283, more than enough to trigger the compact.

In addition to removing an imbalance in our system that favors Republicans, this novel approach would fundamentally change how candidates run their presidential campaigns. Currently, they are incentivized to ignore most of the country. If you live in a “safe” state, red or blue, your vote for President is basically decided before you cast it. Campaigns spend their time and money in a handful of swing states while the rest of us watch from the sidelines. If the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is adopted, they'll have reason to hit every state because they're aiming to win the largest swath of the country as a whole, not just certain states.

States have until July 20, 2028 to join the compact in time for the next presidential election.

We can fix our democracy. The time is now.

Please like and share if you support this idea!

[cubicx @morenmb]

@hydrogentechguy It's not Talarico, it's you.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@bigtobe52 @davidhogg111 The founder, I'm a customer and started voting blue since 2012

[cubicx @morenmb]

@LauraLoomer Is it harder than russian?

[David Hogg 🟧 @davidhogg111]

One thing people aren’t talking much about- last night went so well that it’s possible the next president may be elected based on the popular vote via National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

[cubicx @morenmb]

@LaloUrbanoM @SecRubio Trump no es conservador de a de veras, tiene más en común con el kks que con Ronald Reagan. El plan 2025 que maga está usando como plataforma para eternizarse en el poder es una calca de manual del foro de sao paulo.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@FatMouth45 @JoeyMannarino ...while a maga president was in the white house.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@sayitnspinit I'm paying inflated prices because of the ineptitude and corruption of republicans, from this side you are the one who looks stupid.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@QuincyBela This same guy got the best years of Monica Belluci, he must know something we don't.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@ItsAllAPsyOpz @gord_eu @devxlsuzzy Says someone with putin's face in his.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@OkestG39002 @AdamKinzinger Because they are closer to the traditional Republican values than maga

[cubicx @morenmb]

@CarolaViveros11 Hablas de tu otra izquierda, la de la Union Europea y EEUU. La Latinoamericana está más cerca de putin, trump, xi, kim,etc.

[cubicx @morenmb]

@OkestG39002 @AdamKinzinger He is not a "dem" he is just decent , that's why he doesn't fit in maga