@nxt888 Africa was colonized rather recently in a historical sense. When Dr. Livingston went to central africa in 1871 he encountered no tribes with any written language, the wheel, any invention whatsoever. Blacks were exposed to white civ for a long time but learned little. Low IQ.
@RodDMartin South Vietnam was just a proxie used to take over the whole country to threaten China. Same thing in Korea. Millions dead for western hegemonic ambitions. So they abandoned their proxie. What else is new.
@RodDMartin Had the USA won the war and stayed, Vietnam would have been poor, sad country like the Philippines and with the added benefit that it would be used to attack China like Taiwan is. All the asian countries that have broken with the West are doing very well with a bright future.
@RodDMartin I used to have a garment factory in Canada and had many refugee employees from Vietnam. Yes, they had horrible stories, but once Vietnam stabilized and their families became successful, their only thought was to return to Vietnam, which had then become successful.
@RodDMartin After the end of WW2, if the US had not supported the return of the terrible French colonialists, Vietnam would have avoided all the deaths and developed quickly into a wealthy country. So everything that came after is basically the US fault.
Thatโs a ridiculous assertion. I was there for 17 months. We were not fighting to win. The South Vietnamese government was corrupt and utterly disconnected from its population, 99% of whom had no clue of what there government was, or what the leadership was doing.
Vietnam was also the victim of obscene colonialism. Beginning with China in the second century, followed by France in the 1800โs, then the Japanese, followed by France again after WWII, then the United States in the late 50โs, until finally it was unified in 1975.
Ho Chi Min petitioned for independence following WWII but the globalist powers, as they divided up the world, decided Vietnam would be best served as a French Colonyโฆ The concept of a Vietnam, led by the Vietnamese was to extreme. The Vietnamese however disagreed. All one has to do is look at Vietnam today, a wildly successful country and realize how wrong and evil colonization was, creating slave farmsโฆ
@Quazil84@Its_ereko@UnathiAfrika I guess you just can't fix stupid. Go to China for God sake. If their pop droped to 1 billion or even 800,000,000, they would be better off. They are automating everything just for that. I also don't believe their stats. There are babies everywhere in China.
@ErekoRex@Its_ereko Some people have been seriously threatened in order to produce such a 180 turnaround from 3 months ago. It fits in with their desire to acquire nukes against Russia. They are the new front on Russia. It's time to see who is being paid off and threatened.
@Mmssaagg4@politicsusa46 It's not a radical theocratic state. That's Saudi and the gulf states. Iran is Persia and existed way befor Islam. It has the largest Jewish community outside of Israel. All my friends who travel there said it was the most interesting and friendliest country they visited.
@xyz_ashley@RealPepeEscobar The "new superpower" isn't so new. It has peacefully co-existed with the other civilizations for 5000 years without invading and plundering their resources.
The "old" superpower's history began with a genocide and owes its existence to death, destruction, and hegemony.
@nxt888 Japan will crash alongvwith USA and China can make an offer they can't refuse because their sugar daddy is dead. Would be a shame to see Singapore destroyed. It is NOT like these useless Gulf Kingdoms. They have no natural resources, not even water. They just used their brains.
@nxt888 I think China's best strategy is to disable TSMC not through embargo but simple sabotage. TSMC supplies 97% of high end chips to USA and stopping supply would crash the AI industry which is the only thing supporting Wall street. Instant crash which kills the dollar and the empire
@nxt888 I could not have said it better. Singapore is in the crosshairs of both sides and it is very difficult to extricate itself. I am quite sure that their heart is with China but they owe much of their wealth to America and money talks loudly in Singapore.
What you are really describing is not some "parallel" between Singapore and Dubai.
You are describing what happens when the United States turns other people's countries into service stations for its empire and then calls the danger "regional instability."
The problem is not China sitting in Asia.
The problem is America dragging Asia into American wars and expecting Asians to accept permanent risk so Washington can preserve primacy from 10,000 kilometers away.
China is not the foreign power in the Taiwan question.
The United States is.
China is not the navy parked across an ocean from its own homeland.
The United States is.
China is not the one that built a global system of bases, encirclement, sanctions, carrier groups, proxy networks, and military blackmail.
The United States is.
And this line about Singapore being punished "if China invades Taiwan" already reveals the propaganda frame.
Taiwan is not Mexico to Beijing.
It is not Iraq to Washington.
It is a Chinese civil war legacy frozen by American power projection and continuously inflamed by U.S. interference.
So no, the lesson is not "China might endanger Singapore."
The lesson is that any Asian state that allows itself to become a logistical appendage of U.S. military strategy is volunteering to become collateral for an empire that never fights near its own cities.
That is the American method.
Turn allies into launchpads.
Turn launchpads into targets.
Then talk solemnly about "deterrence" while other people's ports, trade routes, and families absorb the consequences.
You people always describe U.S. military assets as if they were weather.
As if they just naturally exist.
As if missile defense sites, maintenance hubs, reconnaissance access, naval coordination, and strategic containment were not political choices.
They are.
And once you make yourself useful to empire, do not act surprised when you inherit its risks.
The most dishonest part is that you present this as a warning about China, when the entire scenario begins with U.S. militarization of Asia.
Take America out of the equation and the temperature drops immediately.
Keep America in the equation and every port becomes a pressure point, every island a chess square, every Asian country a frontline in Washington's strategy.
China did not bring the United States to the South China Sea.
The United States brought itself.
China did not cross the Pacific to menace California.
America crossed the Pacific, ringed China with force, armed separatism, and then called Beijing aggressive for objecting.
You are not describing a Chinese threat.
You are describing the price of serving American decline.
And that price is always paid by the host, never by the empire.
@bravenewsworld@ChinaENX CCP did not invent this anti-white propaganda. Jews and Zionist did. CCP is just recycling it. China is not the enemy. Zionist banksters and their ignorant Christian hangers-on are the true culprits.
@YasmeenKazi5@ChinaENX@misha_2307 So much bovine excrement from this slow speaking idiot. African tribes were forever at war and enslaving each other. They sold those slave primarily to Arab Muslims and some to western Jewish traders. He says" Rome never built anything" Has a civilization ever built more. Envy.
@KingFrogTM@ChinaENX@SeediAB Try harder buddy. Xinjiang is thriving and is now a tourist hotspot in China. All your CIA generated anti China propaganda has been debunked so many times it's embarassing.