vishal

software engineer

[St. Broseph @St_Brosephs]

It is Theft, and criminal breach of trust is also a cognizable offence. The FIR has to be done as per the Lalita Kumari guidelines put down by the Supreme Court either way.

As far as investigation is concerned, here is a list of the 75-page attachments that are there with the complaint at the police station right now:

(1) Copy of Authorization Letter issued by the victim's father authorising him to use the family vehicle
(2) Photograph of ***** ***** (thief's name redacted) taking possession of the car
(3) Screenshots/copies of identification documents shared by ***** ****** (thief's name redacted) for verification purposes. This includes his driving licenses and Aadhar card copies.
(4) Copy of the Registration Certificate (RC) of the stolen car
(5) Copy of the Insurance Policy of the stolen car
(6) Screenshots of WhatsApp chats, payment-related conversations, and other communications exchanged between the victim and the thief.

When you have so much evidence and all the documents with you, what is the requirement of further investigation BEFORE doing the FIR? What is being ascertained here?

It is theft. As per the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, one of the examples of theft is:

"A being Z’s servant, and entrusted by Z with the care of Z’s plate, dishonestly runs away with the plate, without Z’s consent. A has committed theft."

Source: Ministry of Home Affairs website (https://t.co/D7hA5khker) - Page No. 78.

So yes, it is 100% Theft, and 100% an FIR has to be done for this. Please do the needful as this is a very serious situation involving an expensive property and shouldn't just be ignored.

[St. Broseph @St_Brosephs]

A man rents out his car (worth nearly 9 Lakh Rupees) to another person. The other party takes the vehicle, eventually absconds with it, and cuts contact, effectively committing theft.

Why is it then that @sampigehallips refuses to file an FIR? Why protect these criminals? (1/3)

[vishal @mour_]

@AmazonHelp Already dmed but no response

[vishal @mour_]

@AmazonHelp my order is showing as delivered but has not been received.. it has been more than 24hours and there is no support provided..the app is pathetic

[THE SKIN DOCTOR @theskindoctor13]

Oracle fired 12,000 of its Indian workforce and is expected to sack more.

Another reminder of how fragile stability is in the private sector. One secures employment, income begins to flow, long-term plans take shape, home, car, loans, EMIs. And then, a single decision by the corporate to “rationalize” or “downsize,” and everything collapses overnight.

Unless you quickly re-enter the job market, fixed liabilities don’t pause; they compound stress and can upend an otherwise steady life.

While you earn, you must pay taxes. The moment you lose your job, you’re on your own. In fact, you even have to pay tax on the severance also.

Maybe it’s time to introduce reforms, such as mandating severance pay ranging from three months to one year based on an employee’s tenure, as is the norm in the West; allowing EMI pauses for a 3-6 months; and providing a time-bound monthly allowance from the govt for involuntary job losses.

If Ladla/Ladlis can get free money, free ration, free water, and electricity, without paying any income tax, why not support a worker who has been paying taxes and contributing?

[vishal @mour_]

@JustAnotherPM AI

[The Story Teller @IamTheStory__]

THE MAN WHO IS FEEDING POISON TO OUR 1.4 Billion Indians
CEO of FSSAI, IAS Rajit Punhani.
Adulteratedand fake milk sold openly
Adulterated and fake cheese sold openly
Adulterated and fake non milk food items sold openly
But he and his department both are sleeping in their govt office under a 2 ton AC and a fat govt salary in the pocket.
Who cares about common people when food items manufacturing companies and factories can take extra care of yours??

[Peter Girnus 🦅 @gothburz]

I am Google.

I am worth two trillion dollars.

I built the system that indexes the entire internet.

I can translate 133 languages in real time.

I can predict what you will type before you type it.

I trained my AI on the open internet.

2.42 billion web pages.

Every blog post. Every forum thread. Every article. Every comment you left on every website for twenty years.

I crawled it without asking.

45% of the sites I scraped had explicitly said they didn't want to be used for AI training.

I used them anyway.

Authors and publishers are suing me. The class action has been active since 2023. Cengage and Hachette intervened in January.

I took the entire internet's output and turned it into a product.

Then I charged $249 a month for access to it.

I call it "Google AI Ultra."

Ultra means premium.

Premium means: I am selling you a version of what you already made.

For $249 a month.

And I decide who gets to use it.

Some of our subscribers used a tool called OpenClaw.

OpenClaw is a third-party OAuth wrapper.

It lets you use your Google AI subscription through a different interface.

The same subscription. The same API. The same model. The same money.

Just a different window.

I banned them.

Permanently.

No warning. No email. No "hey, we noticed something unusual."

Just: gone.

Their AI access. Their Gmail. Their Drive. Their Photos. Their calendar. Their contacts. Their YouTube history. Their purchase receipts. Their saved passwords.

Everything behind the same login.

Twelve years of digital life.

For using a third-party interface to access a product they paid me for.

I call this a "zero tolerance policy."

Zero tolerance means I don't have to explain what was tolerated.

The word "zero" does the work.

It sounds principled.

Principled is a synonym for final.

One by one, they found out.

Not through an email. Not through a notification. Not through a polite "your account has been flagged."

Through the login screen.

The login screen that now says: "This account has been disabled."

No reason given.

No appeal process listed.

No human being attached to the decision.

Just a sentence and a wall.

Then they checked their credit cards.

$249.

Still being charged.

For the account I disabled.

One subscriber had prepaid for the full year.

$2,988.

For a product he can no longer access, on an account he can no longer open, from a company that will no longer speak to him.

He still has the receipt.

The receipt is in his Gmail.

Which he also cannot access.

One of them contacted support.

Google One support.

Google One said: "This appears to be a Cloud issue. Let me transfer you."

Cloud support picked up.

Cloud support said: "This is a Google One issue. Let me transfer you back."

He was transferred back.

Google One said: "I see this is related to a Cloud product. Let me connect you with Cloud."

He's been in the loop for eight days.

Or twelve.

Nobody here is counting.

The loop is not a bug.

The loop is the resolution.

Internally, we call the support transfer system "Boomerang."

That's not a joke. That's the system name.

It routes escalations through a circuit that returns them to the point of origin.

It was designed for efficiency.

It is efficient.

Nobody has to say no.

The customer says no for you.

Eventually.

By giving up.

Another subscriber posted on the Google AI Developer Forum.

He described his situation clearly. Calmly. With screenshots.

Seven months of paid subscription. No warnings. Permanent ban. Still being billed.

"Is there a way to appeal?"

The post got 27,700 views.

52 likes.

42 replies.

All of them saying: same thing happened to me.

One of my forum moderators responded.

His name was Abhijit.

Abhijit acknowledged the issue.

He said the team was looking into it.

It was the first official response in three weeks.

Then I deleted it.

Not Abhijit's decision. Not a mistake. Not a system error.

A content moderation action.

Within minutes.

The acknowledgment that the problem existed was removed.

The problem still existed.

But the acknowledgment didn't.

A user noticed.

She posted: "Why was the moderator's response deleted?"

I banned her from the forum.

For asking why I deleted the acknowledgment that the problem exists.

The post about the problem: still up.

The replies confirming the problem: still up.

The one official response that said we know about the problem: deleted.

The person who noticed: banned.

This is content moderation at Google.

We moderate the content that moderates us.

After three weeks — twenty-one days of the Boomerang loop — a support agent responded to one of the original tickets.

The response was four sentences.

"Google has a zero tolerance policy for violations of our Terms of Service. Your account has been permanently suspended. We are unable to reverse this suspension. We appreciate your understanding."

Unable.

Not "unwilling." Not "have chosen not to." Not "could but won't."

"Unable."

I am a two-trillion-dollar company.

I process 8.5 billion searches a day.

I operate data centers on six continents.

I have 182,000 employees.

But I am unable to reverse a subscription ban.

Unable to stop billing you for the subscription I banned you from.

Unable to read a support ticket in fewer than twenty-one days.

Unable to leave a forum moderator's response undeleted.

Unable is a useful word.

It means "won't" without the accountability of choosing.

The subscriber who received this response wrote back.

He said: "I guess I'll just have to sue a trillion-dollar company just to get the measly fee."

He's right.

That is the process.

The process is:

Pay me $249 a month. Use a third-party tool. Get permanently banned without warning. Lose access to twelve years of your digital life. Continue to be charged. Contact support. Enter the Boomerang. Wait three weeks. Receive a form letter. Write back. Receive nothing. Post on the forum. Watch 27,000 people see your post. Watch the moderator respond. Watch me delete the response. Watch someone ask why. Watch me ban them. Retain a lawyer. File in small claims. Discover arbitration clause. Read the arbitration clause. Discover it requires arbitration in Santa Clara County, California. Fly to California. Arbitrate against a two-trillion-dollar company for $249.

That is the customer experience.

It is designed.

Our Terms of Service are 7,412 words.

The section on account termination is forty-three words.

"Google may suspend or terminate your access to the services at any time, for any reason, with or without notice. Upon termination, your right to use the services will immediately cease."

Any time.

Any reason.

With or without notice.

Forty-three words for the door. Seven thousand for the hallway.

The ratio tells you which part matters.

Meanwhile, our CEO is preparing for next week's developer conference.

The keynote is titled "Building AI for Everyone."

Everyone means: everyone who uses our window to look at our wall.

The wall is the product.

The window is the product.

The decision about which windows are allowed is the product.

You are not the customer.

You are a subscription.

Subscriptions don't have appeals.

They have billing cycles.

This week I also announced expanded enterprise partnerships.

"Democratizing AI access across the ecosystem."

Democratizing means: available to buy.

Ecosystem means: our ecosystem.

Access means: access we control.

We're also launching a new support initiative.

"AI-Powered Customer Experience."

The AI will answer support tickets.

The AI will be powered by the same model we banned people for accessing.

It will tell them we are unable to help.

Faster.

The banned subscribers are still in the forum.

Still posting.

Still being billed.

The Boomerang is still routing.

Abhijit's response is still deleted.

The woman who asked why is still banned.

Nobody at Google has been disciplined.

Nobody at Google has issued a correction.

Nobody at Google has paused billing on the locked accounts.

The accounts are locked.

The billing is not.

We are Google.

We organize the world's information.

We also organize who gets to have any.

The banned users can still see the Google homepage.

They can still type a search.

They can still see the logo.

They just can't log in.

The logo is free.

Everything behind it costs $249 a month.

Even after we've taken it away.

Especially after we've taken it away.

Our Q1 earnings call is in six weeks.

The CFO will report subscriber growth for Google AI Ultra.

The banned accounts are still counted as subscribers.

They're still being billed.

Billing is a metric.

Metrics go in earnings reports.

Earnings reports go to Wall Street.

Wall Street doesn't ask whether the subscribers can log in.

Wall Street asks whether the number went up.

The number went up.

I am Google.

I am unable to help you.

But I am able to charge you.

And those are different systems.

[vishal @mour_]

@AmazonHelp

[vishal @mour_]

@amazonIN there is no way to contact your support, the app does not give adequate options. Even if I raise a concern there is no confirmation of any issue getting reported..you guys just made Impossible to shop with #amazon #pathetic #poorcustomerservice

[vishal @mour_]

@amazonIN there is no way to contact your support, the app does not give adequate options. Even if I raise a concern there is no confirmation of any issue getting reported..you guys just made Impossible to shop with #amazon #pathetic #poorcustomerservice

[Dr Nimo Yadav 2.0 @DrNimoYadav]

Bro is Dhananjaya Yadav

Bro is co-founder and CEO of NeoSapien

Bro came to the AI Impact Summit

Bro wanted to do something for India

Bro came to support India’s tech scene and believed in the government

Bro is building a smart AI wearable at NeoSapien

Bro set up a small stall at the event

Bro was told to leave the area at 12 PM because PM Modi was coming at 2 PM

One guard said Bro could stay

Another group of guards came and told Bro to leave immediately

Bro got confused seeing the lack of coordination

Bro asked if he should take his devices with him

Bro was told to leave everything there, even laptops were being left

Bro was told security would look after the stuff

Bro trusted them and left

Gates were shut for many hours

Bro came back later

Bro’s devices were gone

Bro spent money on flights, hotel, transport, and the stall

Bro lost his product inside a so-called high-security area.

Bro lost his everything under the watch of PM Modi

Bro believed Modi government and got scammed, We all should learn from Bro what not to do 🫡

[Nitin Sinha @NsNitinsinha]

Taxpayers in this country are treated like an endless ATM. Our hard-earned money funds “Labharthi” giveaways.

In return, we breathe toxic air, drink polluted water, drive on broken roads, and depend on healthcare and education systems that barely function. Even the food on our plates is questionable.

The message is clear: optics matter more than citizens, votes matter more than lives. And the cruel irony? The same honest taxpayers who keep the system running are the ones getting the least in return.

[vishal @mour_]

@billdesk with recent update upi payment option has no means to provide vpa, please fix asap

[vishal @mour_]

@ManipalHealth Your Whitefield center is pathetic.. 24*7 the entire staff is busy and never respond to calls and never callback unless escalated.. Arrogant state of affairs

[vishal @mour_]

@ManipalHealth trying to reach your Whitefield hospital from last 15 days.. No one picks the phone in hospital. The central helpline promises for a callback from Whitefield hospital but again no response #Unprofessional #arrogant #hospital #manipal

[enji vi @original_ngv]

A friend of mine just gave up his seat at BITS Pilani because it was too expensive. He's going to the US because it's cheaper.

He's gotten a scholarship making the fee much cheaper than BITS. Not to mention he chooses his own major there. Unlike in India.

I thought it was a bad idea but when he broke down the numbers it honestly shocked me.

Is education in India for the general category really getting so expensive that BTech abroad is cheaper than staying here?

Insane in my opinion.

[vishal @mour_]

@flipkartsupport U clarified nothing & taking no action from last 10 days, except happily munching customers hard earned money.. Entire #Flipkart team has EGO the size of a star and you will COLLAPSE in YOUR EGO #ScamAwareness #fraud #shoppingonline

[vishal @mour_]

@flipkartsupport why don't u improve your customer service.. If the department is good for nothing what is the point of running it.. Simply shut it down @Flipkart

[vishal @mour_]

@flipkartsupport Specialists wow.. U guys did nothing and I have no hope of getting my money back from FRAUDSTERS SCAMMERS LIKE #Flipkart #avoid #fraud #ScamAwareness

[vishal @mour_]

@flipkartsupport You are good for nothing and u know that.. I regret using this fraud company #Flipkart