@fredgreco do you mean the only thing changing is giving people time to think? It sounds like they want to keep working on it over the next year (taking suggestions).
The question concerning LLM use (and phone use) is primarily one about whether we should be attending *first* to what techniques our tools can allow us to use with them, or *first* to how those tools will shape our second nature.
@JonMcK1647 We've transferred in a few EPC guys. Last year we transferred a Baptist. He got same written exams with a bit more scrutiny from the committee and the floor. But never "re-ordained" anyone.
We can’t even make machines that are alive. We don’t even try. Biology is baffled at simply trying to define life.
So why would we think we can skip over life’s irreproducibility and make machines have the functions of life, especially the highest ones such as willing & knowing?
@seanjwestwood Even if AI's translating capacity were up to snuff—which it is absolutely not—the entire point of the humanities is the development of human *powers,* not "output" for its own sake. That's why we have students doing things like writing essays on "Antigone" year after year:
The technology could be incredibly helpful. The value add could be very real. The vocational transformation could be tremendous. But as long as the people who control AI continue to reveal how much they hate the human race, I will pray, cheer, and work for its failure