James Webber

[James Webber @mr26743]

@fr3nchbanana @Salt_Slinger @T850_087D @ShrugD2 @reddit_lies Whatever you say buddy. Never really understood why "I don't understand what your basic words mean" is supposed to make anyone else look stupid, but more power to you

[James Webber @mr26743]

@fr3nchbanana @Salt_Slinger @T850_087D @ShrugD2 @reddit_lies Yes you did, lol

>People who act like they have over 100IQ typically don’t

[James Webber @mr26743]

@fr3nchbanana @Salt_Slinger @T850_087D @ShrugD2 @reddit_lies It 100% is reliable, not that it is 100% reliable. And yes, the second sentence was nonsense. People who are above 100IQ absolutely do act like it

[James Webber @mr26743]

@fr3nchbanana @Salt_Slinger @T850_087D @ShrugD2 @reddit_lies Not perfectly, but yes 100% reliably.

Your second sentence is nonsense too. People tend to overestimate their IQ, but that includes above average IQ people too. Smart people almost always know they are smart

[James Webber @mr26743]

@KevinSabellico @DreamsUnchartd @reddit_lies >the job which was about helping with making burgers in a fast food.

You read this and concluded that they *aren't* slow?

[James Webber @mr26743]

@LibertusMaximus @reddit_lies Just read what they wrote themselves, lol. They fully admit they were struggling with making burgers, they just think that takes more than a few hours to understand.

This one is just a retard

[James Webber @mr26743]

@X__Anderson @JekTonoPorkins1 @Rothmus >The underlying tone that I've imagined actually says something completely different to what I'm imagining that you're saying. Therefore what you said is ignoring history

Lol

[James Webber @mr26743]

@tideburner @Howlingmutant0 No it just means it isn't deadly (please ignore the fact that it was literally deadly, that's just inconvenient)

[James Webber @mr26743]

@Hawksbythesea @AaronGogley @BK_McCallum >He can’t do anything but stab b/c if he just pulls it to warn, he’s in trouble.

That wouldn't exactly be conducive to a self-defense claim

[James Webber @mr26743]

@SandsGuru @AkiZanshin @forcesfrom2006 @ResoluteGoat @literally_chad Just a tip buddy, if you want to pretend you don't care, then four clearly seething (and weirdly homoerotic) replies and immediately blocking kind of betrays that

[James Webber @mr26743]

@SandsGuru @AkiZanshin @forcesfrom2006 @ResoluteGoat @literally_chad Familiar because it used to use Roman numerals until the fifth edition, after which they made the explicit decision to use numbers

Use your own sources if you want, or just ask anyone that actually works with the DSM-5 instead of just larping like they do

[James Webber @mr26743]

@AhlbBzll @sdwesternworld @charlestonwhyt Key word there is "believe". It's a way of getting people to assert what they already believe, but if an actual argument could be made, then it would have been.

In this case, it's blatantly idiotic since the defense also hasn't called Hunter

[James Webber @mr26743]

@SandsGuru @AkiZanshin @forcesfrom2006 @ResoluteGoat @literally_chad But of course it's pedantic, lol. That's just what happens if you correct someone's grammar whilst also making mistakes yourself

[James Webber @mr26743]

@AkiZanshin @forcesfrom2006 @ResoluteGoat @literally_chad No it isn't, lol

No one that works with it calls it DSM V, only people that think two seconds of googling is the same as knowing it

https://t.co/APkRQZLFPk

[James Webber @mr26743]

@JustinSadur @cremieuxrecueil Well of course it does. Every moral dilemma is going to be non-compelling if you just straight up don't understand one side of it

[James Webber @mr26743]

@AkiZanshin @forcesfrom2006 @ResoluteGoat @literally_chad You also mean *excerpt and *DSM-5

[James Webber @mr26743]

@buymyalbum @GOGcom Shockingly, the apology is apparently not good enough either

[James Webber @mr26743]

@JustinSadur @cremieuxrecueil You might be.

Like there's good arguments for either vote, but it should be extremely obvious why people might pick the option that immediately removes any chance of death

[James Webber @mr26743]

@DukeOfGhost @nefariousgrin @KevinWyoming2 @yumyumeg For sure. It's pretty obvious he just read that the juror was taken out of context, never actually looked up what she said, and then massively coped instead of just accepting he was wrong

No idea how he thought no one else would notice that though

[James Webber @mr26743]

@chicagobeers1 @Jesse_Leg Ok...?