Olivia
Online
MRA SIFF
@mra_siff
Joined November 2023
142 Following
75 Followers
34.7K Posts
“Courts cannot be reduced to instruments of coercion.”
When even the High Court takes note of “mushrooming cases” under Section 69 BNS, it is not an observation — it is a warning.
A man was kept behind bars for 42 days…
Not after conviction.
Not after trial.
But merely on an allegation dressed as “deceit.”
Can a failed relationship automatically become a criminal case?
Karnataka High Court raises serious questions after man spends 42 days in jail.
This is the reality—consensual relationships end, and men land in jail.
Courts are now openly acknowledging the pattern, yet damage to men is already done.
Until accountability is fixed, criminal law will keep being used as a post-breakup weapon against men.
TO READ EXACTLY WHAT THE HIGH COURT SAID AND DOWNLOAD THE ORDER COPY, CLICK HERE:👇
https://t.co/k9PK2OCOTd
#MensRights #JusticeForMen #GenderNeutralLaws #MisuseOfLaw #FalseCases #BreakingNews #498A #Section69
Granting a bail to a criminal just because the criminal/accused is a woman?
This shows how our beloved , trustworthy judiciary encourage crimes blindly..!
These kinds of judgments send a very clear message to men:
Don’t compromise in mediation.
Let the case run its full course — even if it takes a lifetime.
Because even after compromise, the system often ensures that a man keeps bleeding for years. So what exactly is the benefit of settling early?
If the outcome is prolonged suffering anyway, then dragging the case becomes the only logical choice.
Most Indian women prefer a parasitic lifestyle, fueled by government freebies schemes. Those seeking maintenance from their husbands in court under CRPC 125 and the #HMA are also part of this trend.
काम करना ही नहीं है तो मिलेगा कैसे?
https://t.co/4HiVD6L4IC
▪️In Achal Singhal v. State of Karnataka & Anr., Karnataka HC, while granting bail to a man charged u/s 69 BNS (rape on the false promise of marriage), who had spent 42 days in jail, flagged the growing misuse of the provision in cases arising out of failed relationships.
▪️Court observed, “Though Section 69 BNS would punish a person for having sexual intercourse with the victim on a deceitful promise of marriage, in the case at hand there is no indication except that the alleged breach of promise of marriage appears to be an afterthought that has surfaced in the complaint.”
▪️As per the facts placed before the Court, the complainant and the accused were colleagues whose friendship gradually developed into a consensual romantic relationship. The relationship lasted for around 8 months and involved physical intimacy, but eventually ended, following which the woman filed a complaint.
▪️She alleged that the accused had engaged in sexual intercourse with her on the false promise of marriage. Based on this allegation, an FIR was lodged, leading to the arrest and continued custody of the accused for over a month.
▪️Upon perusal of the complaint, Court noted that there were no allegations of force, coercion, or absence of consent. Instead, the relationship appeared to be entirely consensual, and the grievance arose only after the relationship had broken down.
▪️Court took serious note of the “mushrooming number” of such cases and observed a pattern where criminal proceedings are initiated after breakups, thereby invoking Section 69 BNS as a tool of retaliation rather than addressing genuine cases of deceit.
▪️Relying on multiple precedents, Court held that the continuation of criminal proceedings in such circumstances would be contrary to settled legal principles governing consent and false promise cases.
▪️Accordingly, Karnataka High Court allowed the applications filed by the accused, granted him bail, and stayed further proceedings pending before the Magistrate.
▪️Court also highlighted the need to prevent misuse of Section 69 BNS in cases of consensual relationships that later turn sour.
#Mentoo #law #Section69
Now days grooms’ families have started rigorous investigations and background checks of the to-be- bride and her family.
It’s high time they verify her past relationships, her actions, her behaviour, and the family background.
Because several frauds are coming out these days.
Also men who are now following the rule:
“No Seal, No Deal.”
She was Strong independent woman.
Now what?
Again victim card came out??
😂😂😂
Any punishment to this women for Adultery ?
@ChitraKWagh
🔥 नारी शक्ति गारंटी? बिल्कुल!**
**अब मर्दों की भी गारंटी दे दो नरेंद्र मोदी जी!**
झूठे 498A, DV एक्ट, मेंटेनेंस केस, बायस्ड कानून, कोई पुरुष आयोग नहीं और रिकॉर्ड पुरुष आत्महत्याएँ — सब भूल गए?
देश की नारी शक्ति तभी मजबूत होगी जब उसके पति, भाई और बेटे भी सुरक्षित होंगे! 👨🦰🇮🇳
#JusticeIsDue
If she wants to spend let her earn self then..!
Why husband should provide her just because he is earning higher…
Simple..
Monalisa Bhosle, the bead seller who became an overnight internet sensation in Prayagraj during Maha Kumbh Mela, has been found to be a minor, leading to an FIR against her husband Farman Khan under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act in Madhya Pradesh.
Monalisa Bhosle married her partner of nearly six months, Farman Khan, at a temple in Poovar last month.
As per reports, the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) launched an investigation that stretched across Kerala and Madhya Pradesh.
The probe has found that Monalisa belongs to the Pardhi tribal community and is legally a minor.
According to hospital records from Maheshwar, her date of birth is December 30, 2009.
Investigators found that the marriage took place in Kerala using forged documents. A fake birth certificate was allegedly created to show Monalisa as an adult.
The marriage was also registered at a gram panchayat office in Kerala using these documents. Temple authorities reportedly relied on Aadhaar details provided by the couple at the time of the ceremony.
Based on the findings, police registered an FIR against Farman Khan at Maheshwar police station in Khargone district of Madhya Pradesh.
Apart from the POCSO Act, charges have also been filed under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, considering Monalisa’s tribal identity.
However, it is noteworthy that Monalisa gave various interviews after her marriage claiming she married on her own Will and is happy.
DO YOU THINK THIS FIR IS FAIR & NCST IS TELLING THE TRUTH OR IS IT JUST ANOTHER FAKE CASE UNDER SC/ST ACT?
COMMENT YOUR OPINIONS
#formenidia #monalisa
A bride in #Agra (Jagdishpura) demanded ₹90 lakhs from the groom on her wedding night, saying that she would not have any physical relations unless he paid her the money.
When the groom refused, a heated argument broke out.
Family members from the groom’s side reportedly tried to counsel the bride, but the situation worsened after she informed her own family.
Bride's family then surprisingly created a ruckus instead of solving the matter and vandalised the groom's house & and even damaged a PNG gas pipeline.
The bride later fled from the scene, reportedly taking along both her own belongings and jewellery belonging to her mother-in-law.
The victim’s family also alleged that they initially approached the local police, but no action was taken.
Then they moved the court, after which a case was registered at Jagdishpura police station against the bride, her father and other associates.
the in-laws further claimed that the bride confessed she was not interested in the marriage and had agreed to it solely for financial gain.
#formenindia
No judge or advocate can deny this bitter truth — LLB has become a waste degree in today’s system.
Even when the wife is well educated… I mean LLB educated…
Still she stands in court claiming she cannot earn, cannot survive, cannot be independent.
Then what was the purpose of giving education to women then?
Why are women given degrees if, in the end, courts still treat them as BURDENs to be carried by men?
Education on paper… dependency in reality.
This guy exposes girls on dating apps every day.
Basically, most of the girls are prostitutes.
They send their pictures without clothes, lure boys, and later blackmail them using pics and threatening fake cases.
He has exposed hundreds of such girls.
Thousands of girls are doing the same on dating apps, mostly college girls.
Is prostitution empowerment now?
Many boys even take their own lives because of this.
Will these girls face any punishment?
Why can't girls get a job and earn honest money?
Are we heading towards self destruction on the name of women’s empowerment.
Just thinking about it..!
This is a warning sign for advocates who blindly run behind women to file false cases.
Mr. Advocates, remember this clearly —
The same system you misuse today can turn against you tomorrow.
If you support false narratives for profit, don’t be surprised when the scam flips sides… and you become the victim.
Because once you normalize misuse of law, it doesn’t choose sides — it just bites back.
Women are weak and fully dependent on men.
How much percentage goes till top?
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.6M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.2M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.8M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.3M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.2M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.9M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers