Olivia
Online
Before the internet, across the Islamic world, criticizing Islam, or even scrutinizing a Muslim religious figure, was unthinkable.
Then, in 2007, a Moroccan named Brother Rachid sat down in front of a camera and started asking the questions. A weekly program that put Islam's history and scripture under examination in Arabic, for an Arabic-speaking audience that had never in fourteen centuries watched it done aloud.
It was a rupture. The taboo that had held since the seventh century broke on live television, and it has not been repaired.
More than a thousand episodes later, Millions of Muslims walked away from Islam because a man on a screen dared to tell the truth.
Countless others found the courage to begin asking in public what they'd only whispered in private.
An entire generation of Arab ex-Muslims can name the show that started it.
Now IDI is bringing that show to English, at the exact moment Islam is expanding into the West and being repackaged in Western vocabularies.
More details soon @BrotherRasheed
What prevents people from leaving Islam even if they don’t believe it?
I left it. Here’s what it’s like to leave — you decide why they don’t.
Countries where Islam is strongest are family-oriented, collectivist honor/shame cultures. In no Muslim-majority country can you leave without legal or social consequences.
My family disowned me. My government tortured me. I was enslaved and called “you Christian slave” in a prison they called the Gulag.
Survival is not the end. If you live, you return belittled, forcibly reconverted, and made to perform religious rituals forever. Society distances itself from you, you’re a token of shame.
After the Gulag I felt worthless. The few who still loved me were not practicing-Muslims; they had to hide the connection and could do little to help.
If by a miracle you escape, it proves to them you lied about reconverting. You are now an apostate on the loose and must be put to death. They come after you. Wherever you go in the world there will be Muslims, including those willing to kill for 72 virgins. You must stay careful even in a non-Muslim country.
I had to change my legal name. New identity, language, and culture: an existential transformation. I avoid Muslims; I know only a handful.
Every trip, every brown person I meet, every decision now passes through a security and sociopolitical filter. Otherwise I am finished.
Use a Western college to warn about Islamism and you are painted as problematic and silenced by leftist staff afraid of Islamophobia. On social media, filters and mass-reporting silence you if you criticize Islam. A large following protects you from platform censorship, but you can’t get a large following if you’re silenced.
This is a very common reality for those who leave Islam. I must keep going, keep informing, and stay faithful to what I believe even when it looks like a lost cause.
Those who leave in the West have it far better than those inside Islamic states, but social consequences remain real and dangerous, especially in Muslim-concentrated areas.
That is why most people do not leave Islam even if they no longer believe it. The cost is significant, the journey is long, and only few make it out on the other side.
Okay walk me through the timeline. I’m serious. I want a Muslim to actually walk me through it, because I was Muslim and nobody ever walked ME through it.
The Dead Sea Scrolls get copied starting around 250 BC. The Septuagint, the Greek translation, same era. And everything from that point forward matches the Torah sitting on my shelf right now. Two thousand years, one text, basically.
So whatever “corruption” happened… had to happen before 250 BC.
Muhammad is born in 570 AD.
Bro.
You’re telling me the Jews scrubbed Muhammad’s name out of the Torah more than eight hundred years before anyone on earth had heard the name Muhammad.
They would’ve needed a prophecy of the guy just to know what to delete.
Which, funny enough, is the one prophecy Muslims insist was in there.
AND THEN they corrupted every single story of Old Testament prophets to be completely different from what the Quran says…
In thousands of ways…
Made up a whole new Joseph story. Made up a plague of darkness and livestock. Made up a whole prophet named Nathan.
And then they suddenly just STOPPED. Said okay, this is the final version of our Tanakh! Clean cut.
And they did all of this with literally no motive. Crime needs a motive.
The whole argument eats itself. It always did.
The Quran is not from God. Jesus Christ is King.
SHOCKING: This Turkish ex-Muslim woman spent 30 years working for a Turkish state organization that sent Muslims to America to engage in jihad and influence politics.
She explains there are two types of jihad: a demographic/missionary jihad, carried out through immigration and conversions.
And a political jihad, where Muslims infiltrate American universities and political movements to influence young people into becoming anti-American, hating Jews and Israel, and seeing Muslims as allies.
They pretend to be secular and support progressive causes, but it’s all taqiyya to gain political power and advance Islam. Even though they are also trying to infiltrate the right, Muslims have realized the left and progressives are their biggest useful idiots.
Does anyone in particular fit that description and come to mind? It’s all starting to make sense now.
The Persecution That Doesn’t Make the Headlines
I am a Muslim convert to Christianity. I lived for 15 years as a Christian believer in Morocco, much of that time in what we called the underground church.
Listen carefully, because this is what “moderate Islam” looked like for us:
Morocco is considered one of the most moderate Muslim countries. That is true compared with Mauritania and Libya, where converts from Islam face the death penalty, or Egypt, Jordan, Syria, the West Bank, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Pakistan, where converts face imprisonment, torture, intimidation, or severe persecution.
But here is the reality of “moderate” Morocco.
We gathered secretly in homes every Sunday because churches were for foreign Christians, not Moroccan converts. We sang in low voices so the neighbors would not hear us. We arrived two at a time to avoid suspicion. If anyone asked, we pretended it was simply a gathering of family and friends.
We baptized converts in bathtubs.
I was baptized in a bathtub myself. A missionary and a few Moroccan Christians were the only people present.
We kept our house churches small, usually fewer than twenty people. When they became too large, we split them. Christmas and a few special occasions were exceptions.
Police raided Christian gatherings, confiscated Christian materials, dragged believers to police stations, interrogated them, threatened them, and humiliated them with vulgar language.
Our children had to go to school and study Islam and memorize the Quran even though their parents were Christians.
We could not freely give our children Christian names. The government did not need to write “Christian names are forbidden” in bold letters. The authorities simply refused to register them.
Our marriages were treated as Islamic marriages under Sharia because the Moroccan state refused to recognize us for what we actually were: Moroccan Christians.
A Moroccan Christian woman could not simply marry a foreign Christian man as a Christian. He had to establish before the authorities that he was Muslim because, according to the government, she was still a Muslim.
The state decided our religion for us.
Even death did not end it.
When a Moroccan Christian died, he was buried in a Muslim cemetery under Islamic rituals because the government still considered him Muslim. I remember one Moroccan Christian who died in Tangier. We had to do the impossible to get his body to Ceuta so he could receive a Christian funeral.
Imagine having to smuggle your religious identity across a border just to be buried according to your own faith.
We could not establish our own legal Moroccan churches. We could not get permission to build even one church for Moroccan converts. Our house churches were illegal gatherings. We lived at the mercy of the police. Any meeting could be raided. Any neighbor could report us.
Foreign Christians had churches.
Moroccan Christians had secrecy, whispers, living rooms, bathtubs, police interrogations, and fear.
And then Muslims lecture the West about “Islamophobia.”
Spare me.
1/2
The Muslim religion is the fastest-growing religion per capita in the United States, especially among minority races.
Last month I attended a training. During the training session, three speakers representing the Roman Catholic, Protestant, and Muslim faiths each presented their beliefs.
I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say. The Muslim gave a great presentation of the basics of Islam, complete with a video.
After the presentations, time was provided for questions and answers. When it was my turn, I directed my question to the Muslim and asked:
'Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a holy jihad [Holy war] against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is a command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?'
There was no disagreement with my statements and, without hesitation, he replied, “Nonbelievers"
I responded, 'So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not of your faith so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?'
The expression on his face changed from one of authority and command to that of a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the cookie jar.'
He sheepishly replied, 'Yes.'
I then stated, 'Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine the Pope commanding all Catholics to kill those of your faith or Dr. Stanley ordering all Protestants to do the same to guarantee them a place in heaven!'
The Muslim was speechless.
I continued, 'I also have a problem with being your friend when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me! Let me ask you a question:
Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because I am going to heaven and He wants you to be there with me?'
You could have heard a pin drop.
Needless to say, the organizers and/or promoters of the 'Diversification' training seminar were not happy with my way of dealing with the Islamic Imam, and exposing the truth about the Muslims' beliefs.
In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the US to elect the President.
I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized unless each of us sends it on! This is your chance to make a difference.
To those who say "it's her choice" I used to say the same thing about my own Hijab.
I was covered head to toe. Even on the beach. Even with my male relatives. And when people challenged me, I said: this is my choice. You know why? Because the other option was burning in hell, hung by my hair for eternity. That's what they taught me since childhood.
Yes, let me repeat it for you to just understand about our version of “freedom of choice.” I grew up in an Islamist culture that gave me two options. Cover yourself and go to heaven. Or don't cover, and be hanged by your hair and burned in hell.
Like when someone puts a gun to your head and says "you can go left or right", technically, yes, that's a choice.
I picked heaven. I called it freedom. And I believed it, because that's what happens when fear is all you've ever known.
And if you think I shouldn't be telling you my story, I don't care. I really, genuinely, from the bottom of my heart, don't care. The women still living under that "choice"? I care about them.
#LetUsTalk
A woman in a hot-air balloon realized she was lost. She lowered her altitude and spotted a man in a boat below.
She shouted to him, "Excuse me, can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago, but I don't know where I am."
The man consulted his portable GPS and replied, "You're in a hot air balloon, approximately 30 feet above a ground elevation of 2,346 feet above sea level. You are at 31 degrees, 14.97 minutes north latitude and 100 degrees, 49.09 minutes west longitude.
"She rolled her eyes and said, "You must be a Republican."
"I am," replied the man. "How did you know?"
"Well," answered the balloonist, "everything you told me is technically correct. But I have no idea what to do with your information, and I'm still lost. Frankly, you've not been much help to me."
The man smiled and responded, "You must be a Democrat."
"I am," replied the balloonist. "How did you know?"
"Well," said the man, "you don't know where you are or where you are going.. You've risen to where you are, due to a large quantity of hot air. You made a promise you have no idea how to keep, and you expect me to solve your problem. You're in exactly the same position you were in before we met, but somehow, now it's my fault."
I blurred these images of the lifeless bodies of Christian babies and toddlers slaughtered by Muslims in Nigeria last Sunday.
As much as I want people to know about the full horror, traumatizing random viewers will not force the needed change.
Western politicians and news outlets that chose silence must be named and held accountable. Their refusal to confront this is not neutrality—it is complicity.
Most “news” sites ignore or bury it, and the few headlines deliberately minimize the massacre of Christians while erasing the jihadists’ identity and motives.
Last Sunday night in Naridon village, Kaduna State, Nigeria, armed Fulani jihadists stormed a Christian farming community. Dozens of Christians, including children, were slaughtered. The lifeless bodies of Christian babies and toddlers offer only a small glimpse of the unimaginable suffering inflicted on Christians every day across Africa and Asia.
Western leaders who never miss a chance to lecture their nations about “multilateralism, diversity and inclusion” never call emergency sessions at the UN Security Council or Human Rights Council when Christians are butchered. They never push real sanctions on the governments and networks that embolden this slaughter.
They look away while the Christian death toll climbs to genocidal levels.
Their actions matter. Their inaction matters more.
History will judge them all.
On a stretch of the River Roding in Barking strewn with waste and detritus, a barrister named Paul Powlesland did something the British state has spent decades failing to do: he cleaned it and made it look like a river again. He now faces legal action.
Yep. He and a group of volunteers hired a digger for £1,000 of their own money and hauled more than 200 bags of filth out of the water - packaging, broken appliances, used needles, even weapons. By any sane reckoning it was a small act of public good, civic spirit at its most potent and wholesome.
For his trouble, he received a letter from the Environment Agency informing him that he is under investigation for working without a permit, an offence that carries up to two years in prison.
The same Environment Agency that found the will to come after a volunteer for cleaning a river without the right paperwork has not, on that same river, prosecuted a single one of the illegal sewage spills that have fouled it for years. Not one. It's too fat, scrofulous, and indolent to fight the sort of people who'd do this. But it has energy to spare for the man with the digger and the bin bags because they expect he's likely to be a reasonable sort of Englishman who pays his taxes and honours procedure, however unreasonable it may be, when levied upon him.
Protecting rivers? They have no interest in that.
This is the thing about our institutions that the public grasps in its bones and the people who run them never will. Our institutions fail, and the manner of their failing is the worst part of it - the bloodless, box-ticking, permission-withholding callousness of bodies that have forgotten they exist to achieve anything at all.
They should all be cleared out; every decision-making body in the building responsible for the dereliction of duty, and for daring to persecute a member of the public, must be hollowed out. The whole thing started from scratch.
Better yet, I'll tell you what an outfit like Progress will do once it gains power; we'll put people like @paulpowlesland in charge of the very body now threatening to jail him. The institutions meant to look after this country - the Environment Agency and a dozen like it - are dying of exactly the defensive, do-nothing culture that sent that letter. They need to be run by people like him who actually give a toss. People with the brains to understand the problem and the plain human instinct to go and fix it themselves, while the rest stand on the bank writing their little sociopathic missives to the ones who already did.
I don't know the first thing about Paul. I've never met him. I don't know what his political preferences are, the shape of his beliefs, what else we would agree or disagree on. None of that means a thing to me. He's a good man, and the right kind of man to make things work; and Progress is an attempt to make the country work, not a club made to serve a certain type or belief profile. A country is made to work by the people who, whatever their politics, cannot walk past a problem without trying to solve it. There are such people everywhere in Britain - on the rivers, in the schools, the wards, the workshops - and almost none of them are running anything, because the institutions have been built to keep that exact kind of person out.
Drop the case against him. Then go further: find the hundred other Paul Powleslands the country is currently ignoring or threatening, and give them the keys. Put the responsibility and the authority, together, in their hands. Britain will be cleaned up - its rivers, and a great deal besides - in no time. It will be done by the people willing to get in the water, not by the ones writing letters about permits from the bank.
🚨 That stare says everything.
A man who resents ordinary people having a voice.
Keir Starmer claims Britain isn’t censoring anyone — while making 30 arrests a day for social media posts.
Threatened X ban. AI phone scanning. US Congress calling him out for going down a dark path.
Britain gave the world the right to speak.
Starmer is trying to take it back.
We will not let him.
The so-called “calculator riots” of 1986 serve as a powerful reminder that today’s anxieties about artificial intelligence replacing human thinking are far from new.
In April 1986, a determined group of math educators staged a vocal protest outside the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) annual convention in Washington, D.C. Led by influential textbook author John Saxon, demonstrators carried signs declaring, “The Button’s Nothin’ ’Til the Brain’s Trained.”
They were opposing the NCTM’s new recommendation to incorporate electronic calculators into mathematics education at every grade level, including homework and exams.
The protesters worried that reliance on calculators would erode students’ mental arithmetic skills, numerical intuition, and deep conceptual understanding, potentially creating a generation of “calcuholics” overly dependent on machines.
The NCTM countered that calculators would free students from repetitive, low-level calculations, enabling them to tackle more complex problem-solving and higher-order thinking. Ultimately, the debate led to a pragmatic compromise: students would first master core mathematical concepts and mental strategies before using calculators as tools for more advanced work.
This balanced approach allowed technology to enhance, rather than replace, mathematical reasoning.
Today, as schools navigate the rapid rise of generative AI, the 1986 calculator compromise offers a valuable blueprint: prioritize genuine understanding first, then thoughtfully integrate powerful new tools.
Christianity has the harshest verdict on human nature of any religion on earth. It also has the most extravagant grace of any religion on earth. That is not coincidental.
Every other religion does one of two things. It sets a bar you can clear; works, rituals, devotion, and moral accumulation, with a path to standing before your god with something to show.
Or it dissolves guilt altogether, telling you the self is an illusion, that sin is merely ignorance, that enlightenment is just a reframe. Human religion, across every culture and every century, moves in one of these two directions. Earn your way in, or talk your way out.
Christianity does neither. It does something no human committee would or could design.
The Sermon on the Mount is not mere moral teaching, it is an intense prosecution. Jesus does not merely raise the behavioral bar, but He relocates it to the interior, where nobody can hide. The Pharisees; the most disciplined religious performers in the ancient world, could clear the behavioral bar. They could not touch the heart bar. Nobody back then could and nobody since has.
Anger is murder, lust is essentially adultery. When Jesus finished speaking in Matthew 5, no one in that crowd was still standing, all their defenses collapsed. That does not look like religion, it resembles a courtroom. And the verdict is an emphatic GUILTY, without exception.
Now watch what happens next.
The same God who delivers that verdict does not simply show mercy. A judge who acquits a criminal is merciful. What Christianity offers is not acquittal. The criminal does not simply walk free. He moves into the judge’s house, he gets the last name and he receives an enormous inheritance. Romans 8:17 says we are heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ. Not pardoned, or tolerated but adopted and entitled to the full inheritance of the eternal Son.
People underestimate what that inheritance means because they think in earthly categories. The richest human who has ever lived will die, and his estate will eventually dissolve. What Romans 8 describes is something creation itself is groaning in anticipation of; the full revelation of the glory of the sons of God. You are not inheriting assets. You are inheriting glory. The shared, eternal glory of the Son of God.
No human religious imagination arrives here. The gap is too wide. The indictment is too severe and the grace is too extravagant, and they are too precisely proportional to each other to have been invented. The depth of the hole and the height of the rescue match exactly. That kind of architecture does not come from a fleshly committee.
The most devastating indictment in the history of religion. The most generous verdict in the history of religion. Both in the same book, both from the same God. The paradox is not a contradiction. It is in my opinion, comprehensive proof of the substance and the veracity of this beautiful faith.
When I was Muslim, I would argue & say we had the same prophets as Christians.
But this one broke me:
Surah 17:101: Allah gave Moses 9 clear signs.
I knew the list. The staff. The shining hand. The drought. The flood. The locusts. The lice. The frogs. The blood.
I held onto those 9 signs like proof I had the real story.
But bro, you know what shook me?
There’s a night missing.
After all nine signs, right before Israel walks out of Egypt, something happens that the Quran goes completely silent on.
A lamb is slaughtered.
Its blood painted on the doorposts.
And death passes over every house covered by that blood.
The Passover.
I grew up hearing the whole Exodus story. But nobody ever told me about the blood on the door.
Islam just skips it.
And here’s what wrecked me.
The Bible, the book I was taught was corrupted, mentions the Passover over 70 times.
Exodus. Leviticus. Numbers. Deuteronomy. The Psalms. The Prophets. The Gospels. Paul.
70 times.
So I had to ask myself the honest question:
If men corrupted this book, why would they obsess over the same story for 1500 years? Across dozens of authors who never met?
You don’t forge a document 70 times.
That’s just not corruption.
That to me is preservation.
And then I read the line that finished me off.
1 Corinthians 5:7.
“Christ our Passover lamb has been sacrificed.”
That’s when it hit me.
The whole story was never just about Moses.
It was always pointing to a King.
The final lamb. Whose blood, when applied to your life, makes death pass over you.
Forever.
The Quran gave me 9 signs but hid the one night that explains why any of them happened.
Because the moment a Muslim understands the Passover…
he’s one step away from the cross.
If you have ever boarded a plane, you should read this once.
In January 2020, Boeing handed over 100 pages of internal messages to Congress. They had to. The court asked for them.
These were not press releases. These were messages between Boeing's own engineers, pilots, and managers. Texts. Slack. Emails. The kind of thing you write when you think no one is watching.
What was inside was Boeing employees, in their own words, describing the plane they were building. Not a critic's words. Not a journalist's. Theirs.
This is the plane that crashed twice in five months. 346 people died.
Here is what they wrote.
- A Boeing employee wrote about the 737 MAX in a 2018 message: "This airplane is designed by clowns, who in turn are supervised by monkeys."
- In a 2018 message, one employee asked a colleague: "Would you put your family on a MAX simulator-trained aircraft?" The colleague wrote back: "No." A third employee said: "I wouldn't."
- Boeing's chief technical pilot, Mark Forkner, wrote in 2016 messages that the MAX's flight control system was "running rampant" during a simulator session. He used a stronger word than "rampant."
- Forkner also wrote that he was "Jedi mind-tricking" foreign regulators into approving the plane without proper training.
These messages were sent before the plane started flying paying passengers.
Then there is the system that killed both planes.
- Boeing added a new piece of software to the 737 MAX called MCAS. It could push the plane's nose down on its own, without the pilot asking. It was triggered by a single sensor on the nose of the plane. If that one sensor was wrong, MCAS would activate anyway.
- Boeing did not tell the pilots MCAS existed. It was not in the flight manual. It was not in pilot training. Most pilots flying the 737 MAX learned the system existed only after the first crash, in October 2018.
- Boeing's own engineering analysis found that if a pilot took more than 10 seconds to figure out what MCAS was doing and override it, the result was "catastrophic." That word is from Boeing's own coordination memo, dated March 2016. Two and a half years before the first crash.
- Pilots in both crashes had no idea what MCAS was. They had no idea the plane was fighting them. They fought it for several minutes. They lost.
Then there is the FAA, the agency that is supposed to catch this kind of thing.
- In December 2018, after the first crash, the FAA did its own internal analysis. The conclusion: if MCAS was left as it was, there would be 15 more fatal crashes of the 737 MAX over the life of the fleet.
- The FAA did not ground the plane. It kept flying for another three months. The Ethiopian Airlines crash happened on March 10, 2019. 157 more people died.
- The US was one of the last countries in the world to ground the 737 MAX. China grounded it first. Then Europe. Then everyone else. The US held out until it could not.
Then there is what Boeing told the public while all of this was happening.
- Boeing's CEO at the time, Dennis Muilenburg, repeatedly told the press the 737 MAX was safe. He told the families of the victims it was safe. He told Congress it was safe.
- Internal Boeing documents released later showed that Boeing had been actively pressuring the FAA to remove every mention of MCAS from the pilot training manuals. Forkner's own messages show him pushing for this in 2016.
- Boeing knew the 10-second reaction time would be catastrophic. Boeing knew the system could be triggered by a single faulty sensor. Boeing knew most pilots had never heard of MCAS. Boeing said the plane was safe.
Then the bill came.
- In 2021, Boeing paid $2.5 billion to settle a fraud conspiracy charge with the US Department of Justice.
- In July 2024, Boeing agreed to plead guilty to a felony fraud charge. A federal judge in Texas rejected that plea deal in December 2024 as too lenient.
- In May 2025, the DOJ announced a new non-prosecution agreement. Boeing avoided a felony conviction. Boeing pays $1.1 billion total. $487.2 million in criminal fines. $444.5 million into a victims' fund. $445 million into "compliance and safety" programs Boeing runs itself.
- The families of the 346 victims asked the DOJ to fine Boeing $24 billion. They were ignored.
- Mark Forkner, the pilot who "Jedi mind-tricked" regulators, was the only individual ever criminally charged. He was acquitted by a jury in 2022.
- Not a single Boeing executive has been criminally prosecuted for any of this.
Now read those bullet points again as one continuous case.
The engineers said the plane was designed by clowns. The chief pilot said he tricked regulators. Boeing's own analysis said a slow reaction would be catastrophic. The FAA's own analysis predicted 15 more crashes. Two crashes happened. 346 people died. Boeing's 2018 net income was $10.5 billion. The 2025 fine of $1.1 billion is roughly one tenth of that. No executive went to prison.
None of this is a leaked rumor. None of this is a journalist's interpretation. These are court filings, DOJ press releases, House Transportation Committee reports, and Boeing's own internal documents.
The point of this post is not to scare you off your next flight.
The point is to notice what just happened.
A company knew its plane could kill people. It had the math in writing. It told the regulators a different story. It told the public an even different story. The plane killed 346 people. The 2018 net income alone was nine times the eventual fine. The man who lied to regulators walked free. The whistleblowers were silenced or are dead.
And the company is still building planes today. The same factory.
The lesson is not "do not fly Boeing." Most of us cannot tell which plane we are boarding, and switching to a different airline often gets you on the same model anyway.
The lesson is the gap between what a company says and what its own employees write down when they think no one is watching.
When a company tells you it cares about safety, ask what its engineers are saying internally. When a company tells you its product is fine, ask what its lawyers know. When a regulator tells you a product is approved, ask who paid to be in the room when it was approved.
346 people boarded a plane that day in Indonesia. 157 more boarded one in Ethiopia. None of them knew about MCAS. None of them knew about the 10-second window. None of them knew their pilots had not been trained.
The clowns and monkeys line is funny until you read the next page of the report.
That is when you find out what the clowns and monkeys built.
Finsteres Mittelalter – Blüte des Islam?
Ein weitverbreiteter Mythos bezüglich des Islam lautet, dass, während die Christenheit im „finsteren Mittelalter“ versank, im Islam Wissenschaft, Mathematik und Medizin blühten. Die Realität jedoch sah anders aus:
- Fast alle „islamischen“ Errungenschaften wurden von Völkern erbracht, die der Islam gerade erst unterworfen hatte. Die „arabischen“ Zahlen wurden z. B. von unterworfenen Hindus entwickelt, der berühmte Mathematiker Thabit ibn Qurra war ein Angehöriger der unterworfenen Sabier und das erste „wissenschaftliche Medizinbuch in der Sprache des Islam“ wurde von einem syrischen Christen im unterworfenen Alexandrien verfasst.
- Dass die islamische „Kulturblüte“ ab dem 14. Jahrhundert dann weitestgehend verschwand, lag vor allem daran, dass der Islam sich in allen eroberten Ländern durchgesetzt hatte.
- Die Erzählung vom „finsteren Mittelalter“ ist hingegen ein Mythos der Aufklärung. Z. B. wurden die architektonisch bedeutendsten Gebäude der abendländischen Kultur, wie Kirchen und Kathedralen, im Mittelalter erbaut. Nur sehr wenige der später errichteten Gebäude reichen an die „finstere“ mittelalterliche Baukunst heran.
THE QURAN IS NO LITERARY MIRACLE
Muslims boast that the Quran’s Arabic style is an unmatchable “i’jaz” miracle proving its divine origin. This claim is pure myth that collapses under honest examination.
Jehovah never authenticates His messengers through subjective beauty contests or linguistic challenges. He uses clear public signs, mighty works, and precisely fulfilled prophecy—as He did with Moses (Exodus 4:1–9) and Jesus (John 5:36; Acts 2:22). The Quran offers none of these objective proofs.
The Quran’s own challenge to “produce a surah like it” is circular, unfalsifiable, and Arabic-only. It ignores that eloquent rhymed prose (saj‘) and rhetorical devices already existed in pre-Islamic poetry and soothsayer speech. Surah 55 repeats the same refrain thirty-one times without meaningful progression. Topics shift abruptly with no logical flow. Grammatical shifts (iltifāt) and variant readings (qirā’āt) were needed to fix inconsistencies.
Even worse, the Quran directly contradicts established Scripture by denying Christ’s crucifixion (Surah 4:157), failing the Deuteronomy 13 test for false prophets. It relies on abrogation to replace earlier verses and required Uthman to destroy competing codices after Muhammad’s death to enforce uniformity.
The Bible, by contrast, unfolds one coherent plan across sixty-six books, multiple authors, and centuries—anchored in hundreds of verifiable prophecies, eyewitness testimony, and manuscript evidence accurate to 99.99%.
Style alone never proves divinity. Seek the real evidence: signs, prophecy, and harmony with prior revelation.
Read the full article by seeing our pinned post that dismantles this Islamic assertion.
Activist: "Your cows are putting carbon into the atmosphere."
Farmer: "Where did they get it?"
Activist: "What?"
Farmer: "The carbon. Where did the cow get it before it put it anywhere."
Activist: "From... eating?"
Farmer: "From eating grass. And where did the grass get it."
Activist: "The soil?"
Farmer: "The air. The grass pulled it out of the air last spring. The cow ate the grass. The cow breathed some of it back out. It went back into the air it came from."
Activist: "But it's still going into the atmosphere."
Farmer: "It's going back. There's a difference between a thing going somewhere and a thing going back. You've described a circle and you're frightened of it."
Activist: "Then just don't have the cow."
Farmer: "The grass still dies in autumn. It rots where it falls. The carbon goes back into the air either way, just without anyone getting fed in the middle."
Activist: "It's not that simple."
Farmer: "It's grass, cow, breath, grass. Or it's grass, rot, air, grass. Same circle, fewer dinners. If that's complicated for you I'd stay away from the water cycle. That one's got clouds in it."
Dave: “Hello, caller, you are on the air.”
Caller: “I don’t think billionaires create value.”
Dave: “Okay. What do you mean by that?”
Caller: “Nobody can earn a billion dollars ethically.”
Dave: “Alright. What do you do for a living?”
Caller: “Well, before this, I was a bartender.”
Dave: “Nothing wrong with bartending. Honest work.”
Caller: “Right.”
Dave: “And now?”
Caller: “I work in government.”
Dave: “Okay. So let me get this straight. You're saying Elon Musk, who helped build PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX, and Starlink, has made innovations like online payments, electric cars, rockets, and satellite internet possible, didn't earn his way to being a billionaire?"
Caller: “None of that justifies being a billionaire.”
Dave: “Well, sure sounds like value got created somewhere along the line.”
Caller: “I disagree.”
Dave: “What exactly did you build?”
Caller: “I advocate for economic justice.”
Dave: “No ma’am, I mean actual products.”
Caller: “…”
Dave: “You’re telling me the guy catching rockets mid-air created less value than a person who used to serve mojitos and now votes on spending his tax dollars?”
Caller: “That’s unfair.”
Dave: “What’s unfair is pretending markets are imaginary while cashing a government paycheck funded by the businesses you claim don’t create value.”
Caller: “I’m actually a congresswoman.”
Dave: “Oh Lord. Of course!"
CV.
Completely ruined a major 126 year old political party in less than 2 years.
Became the most hated UK Prime Minister in history.
Unilaterally gave away billions of £'s of taxpayers money with no accountability required from the recipients.
Wrecked the economy.
Failed to control mass immigration, both legal and illegal.
Failed to address the problem of muslim rape gangs.
Increased welfare payments to a point where benefits now cost more than the entire income tax take.
Allowed weekly pro-Palestinian hate marches on our streets.
Consistently referred to people with concerns about the proliferation of migrant violence as "Far Right".
Promoted one of his friends to high office despite knowing he was a buddy of one of the most prolific paedophiles on the planet.
Consistently worked to reverse the result of the biggest democratic vote in British history by stealth.
Placed tax dodgers, fraudsters and CV fantasists in Ministerial posts.
Invited a known islamist terrorist to No.10 while simultaneously banning foreign commentators from the UK for merely reporting on the border fiasco.
Took two weeks to find a Royal Navy ship that actually worked.
Introduced legislation that will destroy the private rental market and create hundreds of thousands of homeless families.
Promised to build 1.5 million homes in five years despite everyone telling him it would be impossible.
Failed to help motorists and hauliers after the rise in the price of fuel caused by the war in Iran.
Continues to allow Ed Milliband to wreck the UK's energy industry with his insane Net Zero policies.
Raised the minimum wage and employers National Insurance contributions leading to thousands of job losses and businesses folding.
Introduced VAT to private school fees leading to many excellent seats of learning closing their doors.
Consistently refused to answer questions during the session in the parliamentary week set aside for this specific purpose.
Consistently failed to accept responsibility for any wrong doing, preferring to sack others instead.
Alienated "working people" while claiming to be on their side.
And the lies. The constant lies.
Failure. Failure. And more Failure.
Time to go.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
laos Swing
mezzo
Seen from Germany
Muhammad faizan
Seen from Pakistan
Gizli takipci
Seen from Turkey
若狭踊り屋 祭わ衆
Seen from United States
Thích Bú Lồn
Seen from Vietnam
Mohamed Osama
Seen from United States
Nguyen Duy
Seen from Vietnam
👑Cherry 🆘🇻🇪
Seen from Chile
R3xstone | Open Comm 
Seen from Malaysia
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.7M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.9M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.3M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.3M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.1M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers