شاید با خودت فکر کنی توییت تو نتونه جلوی اعدام #بنیامین_نقدی رو بگیره
اما وظیفه تک تک من و شما رسوندن صدای او به گوش جهانیان هست
پس لحظه ای سکوت تو یعنی حمایت از ظلم و ظالم
#KingRezaPahlaviForIran
Saudi Prince MbS reveals that President Obama gave Iran $150B, and the IRGC didn’t even build a single street with that money.
Instead, they used the money to make missiles and drones. And on top of that, they also used the funds Obama provided them to finance and arm terrorists like Hamas, Ansar Allah, and Hezbollah. With these funds, Iran offers safe harbor to the leaders of Al Qaeda, including one of Osama Bin Laden’s sons who was indoctrinated into jihadism.
Obama is by far the worst man to ever set foot in the Oval Office. The neoliberals like Hillary Clinton, Victoria Nuland, Samantha Power, etc. who ran his administration did so deliberately in order to keep the region destabilized and to use Iran as a buffer to prevent the Gulf states and Israel from amassing too much prosperity.
BREAKING: "We don't know who the leader is in Iran because, remember, regime change. Khomeini is gone. He's gone to greener pastures."
"He's gone and all of his team is gone. Then a second group came in. They're all gone. And now you have the third group. And they were a little concerned about being gone too." -President Trump
@marklevinshow If they hadn’t attacked, the Islamic Republic would have used its large missile stockpiles as a deterrent to advance its nuclear policy, similar to North Korea’s strategy. This tweet explains it very well.
https://t.co/lvWKTSIdlW
Iran was trying to use the North Korean model to get a nuke: create sufficient conventional deterrence so you won’t be challenged in acquiring one (it’s called the Seoul Hostage Problem).
This has been explained over and over since day one.
Everyone claiming shifting goalposts or no imminent threat has been lying.
The reason North Korea was allowed to get nukes is because Seoul (and its 10 million inhabitants) is within artillery and rocket range of North Korea.
During the 1994 nuclear crisis, the Clinton administration seriously considered airstrikes on North Korea’s Yongbyon reactor but backed off precisely because of the artillery threat to Seoul.
Iran was trying to accomplish the same by stockpiling missiles and drones which would have had the same deterrent effect. The proof is what Iran has been doing in the past month: attacking all its neighbors in order to pressure the US to stop attacking it
Beyond this, they were building medium-range ballistic missiles that could reach Paris and London, meaning all of Europe could be held hostage as they built a nuclear bomb.
The reason Iran has not built a nuclear weapon until now is not because it couldn’t, but because it knew it would be attacked and denied this capability.
So by allowing them to continue developing this conventional deterrence, you would be allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon.
And unlike North Korea, Iran is led by an eschatological death cult
Reagan saw nuclear mutually assured destruction (MAD) as both morally bankrupt (because of the innocent-body-count problem) and dangerously fragile because it assumed flawless rationality between adversaries…this means it only takes one irrational actor to destroy the world.
Working backwards from the conclusion that Iran’s Islamist regime must never have a nuclear weapon, it was necessary for the US to attack Iran to deny it the conventional capacity to hold the entire eastern hemisphere hostage.
Every European leader knows this and behind the scenes praises the US for this action. But they are cowards, held hostage by their own internal Muslim populations, and so adopt these ridiculous public positions.
This was never about Israel. And if your argument is that Iran should be allowed to get a nuclear weapon then you are a fool and a traitor to western civilization…you’re a useful idiot
@MasoudTB@nima البته این عدد ۳٪خودش گمراه کننده هست. چون تقریبا۸۰-۷۰٪ نیروهای دیجی کالا نیروهای صف هستن(کارگران انبار،کال سنتر و..)
مخرج کسر باید کارمندای ستادی باشه.
@_A_khalifa Your understanding of Shiism, political Islam, the clergy, the IRGC, and the Islamic Republic is exceptional. As an Iranian, I can say you’ve understood these very well. Your tweets are outstanding.
Dear left, whose entire identity revolves around political correctness, and whose proudest achievement is banning words to virtue-signal about feelings, texting an Iranian “Happy Ramadan” or “Eid Mubarak” is offensive.
Assuming Iranians are Muslim is offensive.
In late December and early January, Iranians took to the streets to protest the rule of the ayatollah.
But the regime in Tehran has sought to tell a very different story—and has done so with the support of media outlets in the West.
Jay Solomon and Negar Mojtahedi report on how Iran’s online propaganda network turned a domestic uprising into a global conspiracy.
Read the full story: https://t.co/uOB5FpV8zv