@Morecryptoonl It will, unless there's a strong message and an actionable plan to migrate to PQC technoloy before it's too late and FUD takes over. Neither one nor the other are in place.
As long as American AI models are used to MASS SURVEIL non-American citizens, and KILL people with humans in the loop, we are good. WTH!! What's wrong with y'all!!
BREAKING: 300+ Google & OpenAI employees just did something WILD.
In 8 hours, the Pentagon's ultimatum expires.
Instead of their companies giving in, employees just made it impossible to comply.
Either Anthropic removes all AI safeguards for military use, or face the Defense Production Act.
Mass surveillance of Americans. Autonomous weapons with zero human oversight. Everything on the table.
While Elon's xAI already signed unlimited access deal.
Dario Amodei, Anthropic's CEO, refused yesterday.
Here's what the Pentagon didn't expect.
Instead of Google and OpenAI staying quiet and cutting separate deals, 300+ employees signed a public letter.
The title: "We Will Not Be Divided."
236 from Google. 65 from OpenAI. All current employees.
All putting their jobs on the line.
The letter exposes the Pentagon's strategy:
"They're trying to divide each company with fear that the other will give in. That strategy only works if none of us know where the others stand."
Classic divide and conquer.
But the employees just called it out. Publicly.
This exact thing happened before.
2018: Google employees protested Project Maven (AI for drone targeting).
Result: Google pulled out. Promised not to use AI in weaponry.
2026: Those same policies are being rolled back.
The difference: This time employees at COMPETING companies are coordinating.
Anthropic, Google, OpenAI. Usually fighting for talent and market share.
Now fighting the same battle.
US military falling behind because ethical companies refuse.
Here's what most people miss:
This isn't about AI ethics.
This is about whether private companies can have red lines at all.
If the Pentagon wins, every tech company knows:
Build anything for the government & they own it.
If Anthropic wins, it proves you can say no to the most powerful military on Earth.
Both outcomes reshape the entire industry.
The most honest sentence in the entire AI industry right now is one nobody wants to say out loud.
Every major foundation model was trained on data its creators did not have explicit permission to use. Every single one.
Anthropic settled for $1.5 billion over 7 million pirated books used to train Claude.
OpenAI faces ongoing lawsuits from authors, newspapers, and code repositories.
Google trained on the entire indexed internet. Meta used Libraries Genesis datasets. And xAI’s Grok was trained on the full corpus of X posts, a decision Musk made unilaterally as the platform’s owner without individual user consent.
So when Elon Musk tweets that “Anthropic is guilty of stealing training data at massive scale and has had to pay multi-billion dollar settlements for their theft.
This is just a fact,” he is telling a true but deeply selective version of the story. The settlement is real. The $1.5 billion is documented. The pirated books are documented. But framing this as an Anthropic problem rather than an industry-wide structural reality is competitive positioning disguised as moral outrage.
Here is the actual mechanism nobody is mapping.
Anthropic accused Chinese labs of distilling Claude through its public API. Musk responded by pointing out Anthropic trained on stolen data.
Gergely Orosz, a respected engineer, wrote “Anthropic can’t have it both ways.” All three are correct simultaneously and all three are being selectively honest.
The structural reality is that the entire foundation model industry sits on an unresolved intellectual property question worth hundreds of billions of dollars. Every lab trained on data it did not license. Every lab knows this.
Every lab’s legal strategy is to get big enough that the settlement becomes a cost of doing business rather than an existential threat. Anthropic already paid $1.5 billion. That is not a punishment. That is a licensing fee paid retroactively under legal pressure.
The reason Musk is raising this now has nothing to do with ethics. Anthropic is in conversations with the Pentagon. xAI is competing for the same contracts. Framing your competitor as a data thief three days before a defense meeting is not moral clarity. It is positioning.
And the deepest irony is the China angle. The United States wants to restrict Chinese access to American AI models on intellectual property grounds. But every American AI model was built on intellectual property its creators took without permission from millions of authors, coders, artists, and publishers.
The entire moral framework for the technology export control regime rests on an intellectual property argument that the American labs themselves have not resolved domestically.
That is not hypocrisy anyone in the industry wants to discuss because the moment you acknowledge it, the legal and regulatory exposure scales to every company simultaneously.
Musk is weaponizing it selectively. Anthropic is deflecting it selectively the way I see this.
And the actual creators whose work built every one of these models are watching billionaires argue about who stole from them more ethically.
@sanchezcastejon mejor aun, acabo de descubrir la herramienta perfecta: @ZKPassport. Con una herramienta así, ya lo tenemos solucionado. Solo hace falta validarla, promocionar su uso y que las plataformas la integren
@sanchezcastejon Estoy de acuerdo con impedir el acceso a las redes a los menores de 16. Pero seria mejor que los fabricantes de moviles y no las plataformas fueran quienes implementaran mecanismos seguros y privados de verificacion de edad que las plataformas pudieran utilizar.
I wake up every morning with my cortisol through the roof.
No matter how fast I work, someone is working faster.
Fall behind for a single week, and the entire landscape has shifted.
And when you try to explain it to people around you, they look at you like you're crazy.
But you're not crazy. You're not blindly anxious. You're awake. Most people won't feel this until it's too late.
Well, we should start a global conversation and ask ourselves is it what we really want? Is this the future we want for humanity? If not, just ban this individual and his transhumanist delusions
Elon Musk thinks coding dies this year.
Not evolves. Dies.
By December, AI won’t need programming languages. It generates machine code directly. Binary optimized beyond anything human logic could produce. No translation. No compilation. Just pure execution.
Musk: “You don’t even bother doing coding.”
Code was never the point. It was friction. A tax we paid because machines didn’t speak human. AI just learned fluent human. The tax is gone.
Now plug that into Neuralink. No syntax. No keyboard. No screen.
Musk: “Imagination-to-software.”
Thought becomes executable. You imagine an outcome, the system architects and compiles it into reality instantly.
We’re not automating programming. We’re erasing it from existence.
The entire profession collapses into a thought. Decades of training reduced to irrelevance. The gap between idea and instantiation hits zero.
You don’t build anymore. You imagine, and it materializes.
Not incremental progress. Total phase shift. The way humans have created things for ten thousand years just became obsolete.
Welcome to a world where the limiting factor isn’t skill, resources, or time. It’s whether you can picture what you want clearly enough for a machine to birth it into existence.
@NATOJFCBS FYI Ampurdán is the Spanish word for the original Catalan one Empordà. This is the kind of stuff that pisses Catalan People off. A foreign army in foreign land.
🚨 HERE’S WHY BITCOIN IS NONSTOP DUMPING RIGHT NOW
If you still think $BTC trades like a supply-and-demand asset, you MUST read this carefully.
Because that market no longer exists.
What you’re watching right now is not normal price action.
It’s not “weak hands.”
It’s not sentiment.
And it’s definitely not retail selling.
Most people are completely unaware what’s happening.
And by the time it becomes obvious, the damage is already done.
This move didn’t start today.
It’s been building quietly under the surface for months.
And now it’s accelerating.
Here’s the truth:
The moment supply can be synthetically created, scarcity is gone.
And when scarcity is gone, price stops being discovered on-chain and starts being set in derivatives.
That is exactly what happened to Bitcoin.
And it’s the same structural break that already happened to:
→ Gold
→ Silver
→ Oil
→ Equities
Once derivatives took over.
The original Bitcoin thesis is broken.
Bitcoin’s valuation was built on two ideas:
→ A hard cap of 21 million
→ No rehypothecation
That framework died the moment Wall Street layered this on top of the chain:
→ Cash-settled futures
→ Perpetual swaps
→ Options
→ ETFs
→ Prime broker lending
→ Wrapped BTC
→ Total return swaps
From that point forward Bitcoin supply became theoretically INFINITE.
Not on-chain.
But in price discovery, which is what actually matters.
Synthetic Float Ratio (SFR).
The metric that explains everything.
Once synthetic supply overwhelms real supply, price no longer responds to demand.
It responds to positioning, hedging, and liquidation flows.
Wall Street can now trade against Bitcoin.
They’re not guessing direction.
They’re doing what they do in every derivatives-dominated market:
1⃣ Create unlimited paper BTC
2⃣ Short into rallies
3⃣ Force liquidations
4⃣ Cover lower
5⃣ Repeat
This isn’t “betting.”
It’s inventory manufacturing.
One real BTC can now simultaneously back:
→ An ETF share
→ A futures contract
→ A perpetual swap
→ An options delta
→ A broker loan
→ A structured note
All at THE SAME TIME.
That’s six claims on one coin.
That is not a free market.
That is a fractional-reserve price system wearing a Bitcoin mask.
Ignore it if you want, but don’t pretend you weren’t warned.
I’ve been calling Bitcoin tops and bottoms for over a decade now, and I’ll do it again in 2026.
Follow and turn on notifications before it's too late.