@bongwe_ncube@SABCNews It false.. these lawyers want to milk him dry of his money... the constitutional court is the last arbiter... you also don't know... I see..
These lawyers are behaving like the Gupta Brothers around Zuma
@XUFFLER@SABCNews No.. is not what Zuma want, but what is it about what these lawyers want,,, his money..
They've learned a lot from the Gupta Brothers
An EFF supporter was seated next to an older woman on an airplane and he turned to her and said, “Do you want to talk? Flights go quicker if you strike up a conversation with your fellow passenger.”
The old woman, who had just started to read her book, replied to the total stranger:
“What would you want to talk about?”
“Oh, I don’t know,” said the man. “How about Julius Malema and what a good president he will make or how good the EFF will be for this country”
“Okay,” she said. “Those could be interesting topics but let me ask you a question first. A horse, a cow, and a deer all eat the same stuff – grass. Yet a deer excretes little pellets, while a cow turns out a flat patty, but a horse produces clumps. Why do you suppose that is?”
The man, visibly surprised by the old woman’s question thinks about it and says, “Hmmm, I have no idea.”
To which the old woman replies, “Do you really feel qualified to discuss politics, when you don’t know shit?”
An EFF supporter was seated next to an older woman on an airplane and he turned to her and said, “Do you want to talk? Flights go quicker if you strike up a conversation with your fellow passenger.”
The old woman, who had just started to read her book, replied to the total stranger:
“What would you want to talk about?”
“Oh, I don’t know,” said the man. “How about Julius Malema and what a good president he will make or how good the EFF will be for this country”
“Okay,” she said. “Those could be interesting topics but let me ask you a question first. A horse, a cow, and a deer all eat the same stuff – grass. Yet a deer excretes little pellets, while a cow turns out a flat patty, but a horse produces clumps. Why do you suppose that is?”
The man, visibly surprised by the old woman’s question thinks about it and says, “Hmmm, I have no idea.”
To which the old woman replies, “Do you really feel qualified to discuss politics, when you don’t know shit?”
Do you think that a woman at 22 who is of reprehensible character is more valuable than a woman at 32 who is of exemplary character?
If you go for age over character, you cannot blame anyone for the mess that we are in. Men get all of these problems with women because they will for go character for youth and looks. If character is prioritized higher than everything else you will have better marriages and families. Younger women will then be forced to develop better characters if they want a family.
Stop accepting bad character and you will have better outcomes. A woman with poor character will instil that character upon your children. Think about the future not just the present moment.
That is incorrect. A woman in their 20’s really depends on the age of the man.
Aside from that, without a good character, the age of a woman is meaningless. A young woman with a deplorable character is the least desirable thing to a man. Disloyalty and disrespect are more important than age. It is better to have an older woman who is loyal, than a young woman who is of undesirable character. Undesirable character will be the most destructive thing to a man.
Character should be of the highest value to any man who is of value. If character is not the number 1 consideration, then the value system of that man is skewed.