@MarioNawfal@realDonaldTrump
This is because the non-investor class, and we do have ‘classes’, the landscaper with two kids and a loving wife who stays home raising those kids, filling up his diesel truck each day, who always votes Red, is mad as hell. Angry Red will let Blue.
🇺🇸 Trump's rallies may have done Republicans MORE HARM than good in the midterms
Counties that hosted his rallies swung an average of 18.4 percentage points toward Democrats in Senate races, compared with 14.5 points in states where he held no rallies.
That's a pretty terrible result for a president who spent years treating his rallies as a political superpower.
The places where he personally showed up certainly didn't escape the Democratic wave.
Source: Rerum Novarum on TG / Writer: Oliver
@isaacrrr7@JDVance@realDonaldTrump
The options @AriFleischer lays out were of course considered.
They would be a disaster. Another Iraq. Iran is a big territory.
It has big allies. This option would be Afghanistan in spades.
Thump has the right plan. It’ll work, in time.
🚨🇺🇸 ARI FLEISCHER, EXPORTAVOZ DE LA CASA BLANCA, RESPONDE DURAMENTE A JD VANCE.
Merece la pena leer hasta el final la respuesta completa de Ari Fleischer a una publicación del vicepresidente estadounidense, JD Vance, quien señaló que la guerra con Irán y la relación con Israel estuvieron en el centro de la derrota republicana en las elecciones de medio mandato.
Su publicación acumuló 3,7 millones de visualizaciones en apenas diez horas.
Esta es su respuesta:
«Señor vicepresidente:
Permítame ofrecerle una perspectiva diferente.
El problema no fue la guerra con Irán. El problema fue el alto el fuego.
Si comienzas una guerra, debes ganarla y llevarla hasta el final. De lo contrario, no deberías haberla iniciado.
Esta guerra debería haber terminado hace seis meses, con el estrecho de Ormuz completamente abierto y el petróleo fluyendo libremente. Deberíamos haber eliminado a los mandos de segundo y tercer nivel del liderazgo iraní y apoyado a las fuerzas prooccidentales que podrían haber tomado el poder.
Estábamos al borde de un Oriente Medio nuevo y más pacífico, pero retrocedimos en el momento decisivo. Teníamos la oportunidad no solo de impedir que Irán consiguiera armas nucleares, sino también de acabar con el mayor Estado patrocinador del terrorismo del mundo.
En cambio, llegamos a un alto el fuego, seguido de meses de incertidumbre sobre si completaríamos la tarea o no. Cada día se transmitía un mensaje diferente, y así seguimos hasta hoy. ¿La guerra terminó? ¿Está a punto de reanudarse? Nadie lo sabe. Reina la confusión y la falta de coherencia.
En junio de 2025, Estados Unidos no estaba involucrado. Era un enfrentamiento entre Israel e Irán.
Nadie obligó a Estados Unidos a atacar Irán entonces, ni tampoco en febrero de 2026. Fue una decisión del presidente Trump. En mi opinión, fue la decisión correcta.
Una vez tomada esa decisión, no deberíamos habernos detenido hasta derrocar al régimen. Pero, en cambio, negociaron un alto el fuego que no se mantuvo, no cumplió su objetivo y nos dejó en una situación intermedia, sin una victoria decisiva, con precios más altos y nuestras fuerzas todavía desplegadas en la región.
Nuestros soldados ya podrían haber regresado a casa, la Marina podría haber vuelto a sus bases, Irán podría tener un régimen amante de la paz, podrían haberse establecido nuevas alianzas y el precio de la gasolina podría haber caído por debajo de los tres dólares por galón.
No, señor vicepresidente. El problema no es la guerra. El problema es lo que se conoce como el "alto el fuego"».
@MAGAVoice@realDonaldTrump
Every Independent should see this! They left Party affiliation to vote for a 'write-in'? Not likely, they rightly found that Party's are corrupt. Follow Stevens. She votes for character and country. That's Trump's endorsed candidates.
@Granite77777 The people who dropped out of either Party to become Independent, @realDonaldTrump understands your frustration. Look at the Democrat candidate for Senate in Michigan who lost in the primary. The Democrat winner is an antisemite. She rejected his racial hatred.
He turned on her.
@EricLDaugh@realDonaldTrump@AGToddBlanche
It's important for the Rule of Law. Lying to the FBI is a crime. If we ever are going to have honest elections, it has to start with President Trump. The Parties are both complicit. You see it in the large increase in the independent vote.
🚨 WOW! MARC ELIAS reportedly just got a CRIMINAL TARGET LETTER after his firm was involved in cheating Alaska's elections with the fake Dan Sullivan
That's in addition to nearly 20 OTHER DEMOCRATS receiving the same letter.
CHARGES POSSIBLE: Donor fraud and conspiracy
It's clear that AG Todd Blanche is NOT letting this go 🔥
Trump is not going to let Alaska's Senate seat be stolen.
How does a human rights activist who once fought against Communism become a violent Red Guard?
Her father came to America seeking freedom from the oppressive Chinese Communist regime. She joined him in raising awareness of the persecution of Mongolians in China.
Then she went to college, where her professors convinced her that she, too, was a victim—alongside other minorities such as Al-Sayed—in a country that is supposedly systematically racist.
For a young mind, the ideological transformation wasn’t difficult.
Her story is not unique. It is a pattern repeated among Chinese American families, as children who grew up with the benefits of American freedom become foot soldiers of Marxist woke ideology.
That is the power—and the magic—of victimology.
Clearly, this young woman was groomed by radical political ideology.
She was on a righeous path and even testified before Congress on Mongolian rights. Her story is interesting.
Temulun Togochog is an 18-year-old U.S.-born Southern Mongolian human rights activist who advocates against cultural erasure and repression in Inner Mongolia.
Exile Heritage: Born and raised in the United States, she has never been able to visit her family's homeland due to her parents' status as exiled political asylees.
She worked alongside her father, Enghebatu Togochog, who is the director of the Southern Mongolian Human Rights Information Center (SMHRIC).
On December 5, 2024, she testified before the U.S. Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC), detailing the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) forced assimilation policies. This includes the rapid erosion of the Mongolian language in schools, the banning of cultural symbols, and the suppression of local spiritual traditions (Tibetan Buddhism and Shamanism).
She has represented her community at high-profile international forums, serving as the youngest spotlight speaker at the International Religious Freedom (IRF) Summit 2026 and briefing global leaders at United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) events.
WHAT WENT WRONG?!
@1Nicdar This girl is an agent for the CCP, most likely, and she needs to be investigated in depth. Her behavior is too wild and completely provocative not to be 'trained' by Party operatives.
@realDonaldTrump