@XenDrawsThings Mediums you frequent. Alot of your takes are interesting and I even disagree most of the time, but this one was filled with such malice.
@ChaosODed Funny story, my buddy actually farmed the palace to get the yen to pay off the debt. The game doesn't let you pay it off, but he did it out of spite.
Some real repercussions coming for Bricks and Minifigs as one of their suppliers https://t.co/I8LU0GccTg has seen enough and are severing ties. Going to make sure to check out their site and give them some business as I am sure this was a hard financial decision.
Happy Pride Month, Wisconsin! π³οΈβππ³οΈββ§οΈ
Join us at noon today as we raise the Pride Flag over the Wisconsin State Capitol for the 8th year to kick off Pride Month and celebrate our LGBTQ neighbors.
Live on YouTube β¬οΈ
https://t.co/D7CWGJ7QJJ
@max_power044@DetectiveSpade_ This is common in media, particularly, movies with Directors, and comics with writers. It doesn't. Comic book fans know this, and it does not detract from the contributions that made the comic book possible.
@max_power044@DetectiveSpade_ I'm not arguing against that. I'm explaining that it's common practice to refer to the writer when referring to a specific run. I am not saying the artist is less or more important. The writer is typically the umbrella under which all other aspects of the run fall under.
@max_power044@DetectiveSpade_ It's impossible to credit every person who deserves it in a natural conversation. Do you credit the editor? Any other co-writers? Do you say Raimi Spider-Man? Does that discredit the other people who worked on the movie? No. It's common practice, not malicious intent.
@DetectiveSpade_ See, you're making a point I'm not arguing against. I'm simply explaining that comic book fans typically reference the writer whenever they refer to aspects of that writer's run. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm explaining that this isn't done to discredit or dismiss anyone