@SarahisCensored If an Anthony supporter touches you, according to their way of thinking, you’d be within your rights to stab them in the heart. Self defense.
@RepShontelBrown@TheDemocrats You see racism everywhere because you’re the racist. Cotton pickin’ is a gentle way of saying damn. I guess Buggs Bunny was a racist too.
The Biden administration actively flew illegals into America with no vetting of their violent criminal past into America and paid for their flights via NGOs.
This is a war crime. Mayorkas and his buddies orchestrated this and should be on trial for their diabolical deeds.
@RepMariaSalazar You are so wrong. You are supporting that illegals who have managed to evade deportation for years are somehow different than those who have recently invaded our country. Does long term breaking our law negate the fact that they entered and stayed illegally? Rewarding evasion!
@SenTedCruz I seriously doubt that the 14th amendment would have passed if it had stated that anyone could illegally enter the USA and gave birth or temporarily visited for the purpose of giving birth resulting in the child automatically become a citizen.
From Ken Blackwell over at FaceBook. GREAT read!
A thread.
1) No Kings explained for people who think they're fighting fascism.
500 groups. Three billion dollars in revenue. Pre printed signs stacked and shipped before you even knew what you were supposed to be mad about.
That is not a spontaneous uprising. That is infrastructure.
That is planning. That is money. That is message discipline.
And that is what you walked into on Saturday.
You looked around, saw the crowd, saw the slogans, felt the energy, and told yourself this was democracy. “No Kings.” It sounded clean. It sounded righteous. It felt like you were part of something organic.
But the signs were ready before your outrage was.
That should bother you.
Because you are not living under a king. You are living in a constitutional republic with elections, term limits, and a press that has spent years attacking the most powerful figures in the country without consequence. No one is being arrested for calling a president a fascist. No one is being silenced for dissenting.
That is not tyranny.
And yet you are being told it is.
You are being trained to see normal functions of a country as authoritarian. Loving your country becomes suspicious. Wanting a secure border becomes immoral. Believing parents should have a say in their children’s lives becomes dangerous. Asking basic questions about elections becomes taboo.
That is not clarity. That is conditioning.
Every country on Earth enforces its borders. Most require identification to vote. That is not controversial anywhere else. It is only controversial here because you have been told it should be.
And you believed it.
Meanwhile, look at the people who actually hold power and how long they have held it:
Chuck Schumer. 46 years. Longer than Stalin.
Steny Hoyer. 45 years. Longer than Mao.
Mitch McConnell. 42 years. 5x more than Napoleon.
Nancy Pelosi. 39 years. Longer than Henry VIII.
Maxine Waters. 35 years. Longer than Mussolini.
Bernie Sanders. 35 years. Triple Hitler’s entire reign.
That is what entrenched power looks like.
Decades. Not months. Not a single term. Decades.
But you are told the threat to democracy is the outsider who disrupted that system for a brief window of time.
You are told he is the king.
No. What you are reacting to is not monarchy. It is loss of control.
You do not hate kings. You hate kings that are not yours.
Because when power consolidates on your side, you justify it.
A sitting president steps aside. Within days, a replacement is effectively crowned without a real contest, without a meaningful debate, without voters having a say in a process that is supposed to belong to them.
No primary. No debate. No ballot.
And you said nothing.
Three days before you marched, lawmakers aligned with your movement rejected voter identification requirements. At the same time, you lived through a period where you had to show documentation to participate in basic parts of life.
You needed proof to eat, to travel, to work.
But asking for proof to vote is suddenly oppression.
That contradiction should stop you cold. Instead, it gets waved away.
Look at how power is actually maintained.
Non citizens are counted in the census. Census numbers determine representation. Representation determines power. Remove verification, expand the count, and you increase influence without ever needing a crown.
That is how modern systems entrench themselves.
Then look at speech.
There is written evidence of government officials pressuring platforms like Facebook to suppress information. Not just misinformation. Information that later proved to be accurate. Scientists were sidelined. Doctors were ignored. Even humor and satire were targeted.
Humor.
🚨 JUST IN: The No Kings protestors are being called out as massive hypocrites after waving COMMUNIST FLAGS in NYC
They don't like kings — but they like straight-up DICTATORS.
The dumbest political movement of our lifetime.
@tkreidl@EricLDaugh Apparently you can’t read. Also President Trump isn’t against ABSENTEE ballots. The case against mail in ballots allows exceptions for absenteeism, illness, disability and the military. Your TDS overrides your ability to understand facts.
𝗕𝗜𝗟𝗟 𝗢'𝗥𝗘𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗬: 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗞𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗕𝗘𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗛𝗘 𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗖𝗞 𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗡
There are facts surrounding Operation Epic Fury that most people either don't know or are choosing to ignore because they don't fit a preferred narrative. Bill O'Reilly laid them out this week, and they matter regardless of where you stand on the war.
Fact one: the United States destroyed approximately 75% of Iran's nuclear capacity in the Israeli strikes last June. Not all of it. Seventy-five percent. Other labs were working on the same program that were not destroyed.
Fact two: by February 2026, U.S. intelligence determined Iran was weeks away from enriching enough uranium to produce a low-level nuclear device — one that could be handed off to a proxy. Trump received that intel.
Fact three: Israel and other intelligence sources then informed Trump that the entire mullah leadership would be gathered in one location at one time. A window that would not last.
Fact four: this came on the heels of six weeks of negotiations in which Iran delivered a clear message to American representatives in Geneva. They were not going to stop. They gave Witkoff and the American team the middle finger in the final meeting.
Fact five — and this is the one that reframes everything. O'Reilly spoke to Trump privately, one on one, by phone, one week before the strikes were launched. His description: the entire conversation was about making a deal. Trump did not want to use military force. They discussed multiple pathways — including O'Reilly's own idea of using Beijing as leverage over Iran. Trump was still looking for an exit from confrontation.
Then Iran walked out of Geneva. Then the intelligence came in about the leadership gathering. Then the decision was made.
This is not the portrait of a president who campaigned on peace and secretly wanted war. This is a president who pursued every diplomatic option available, received intelligence that the threat was imminent and the window was closing, and made the call.
You can disagree with that call. But you cannot honestly claim it was made recklessly or eagerly — not with this timeline in hand.
𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽 𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗻'𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀. 𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗵𝗶𝗺.