@karpathy I 100% agree, a conclusion we have recently arrived at in one of the MSc computing modules that I am leading. Flipped classroom, with case studies and table-top exercises done at the school, leading to an assessment ensuring learning outcomes.
A number of people are talking about implications of AI to schools. I spoke about some of my thoughts to a school board earlier, some highlights:
1. You will never be able to detect the use of AI in homework. Full stop. All "detectors" of AI imo don't really work, can be defeated in various ways, and are in principle doomed to fail. You have to assume that any work done outside classroom has used AI.
2. Therefore, the majority of grading has to shift to in-class work (instead of at-home assignments), in settings where teachers can physically monitor students. The students remain motivated to learn how to solve problems without AI because they know they will be evaluated without it in class later.
3. We want students to be able to use AI, it is here to stay and it is extremely powerful, but we also don't want students to be naked in the world without it. Using the calculator as an example of a historically disruptive technology, school teaches you how to do all the basic math & arithmetic so that you can in principle do it by hand, even if calculators are pervasive and greatly speed up work in practical settings. In addition, you understand what it's doing for you, so should it give you a wrong answer (e.g. you mistyped "prompt"), you should be able to notice it, gut check it, verify it in some other way, etc. The verification ability is especially important in the case of AI, which is presently a lot more fallible in a great variety of ways compared to calculators.
4. A lot of the evaluation settings remain at teacher's discretion and involve a creative design space of no tools, cheatsheets, open book, provided AI responses, direct internet/AI access, etc.
TLDR the goal is that the students are proficient in the use of AI, but can also exist without it, and imo the only way to get there is to flip classes around and move the majority of testing to in class settings.
Dear all, Consider submitting your work in the
SECOND ROUND OF SUBMISSIONS - Deadline: 10 Mar 2023
CPSS 2023
The 9th ACM Cyber-Physical System Security Workshop
Co-located with: ACM AsiaCCS'23
July 10, 2023, Melbourne, Australia
https://t.co/twtCOzfEfi
#Security#research
Please consider submitting your CPS/IoT security-relevant work. For more details: https://t.co/zvItNbu63J
Deadline: 10th Feb. 23
9th ACM Cyber-Physical System Security Workshop
held in conjunction with ACM AsiaCCS'23
Melbourne, Australia, July 10, 2023
#security#workshop
Interesting take on Technical writing for engineers...
TLDR;
1. Do not fear asking questions
2. be authentic
3. create trust with your documentation for newcomers to the project...
Have you listened to The Stack Overflow Podcast yet? Check it out here: https://t.co/CScQ5NWXpN
A Ph.D. studentship is available at the dynamic and multi-disciplinary security group at the University of Strathclyde. @StrathCyber
Deadline: 31st Jan. 2022
Secure Informatics of Industrial Internet-of-Things (Sec-I3oT)
Apply on the following link:
https://t.co/iXz7bXYZ3Q
We kick off #CRITIS2021 with a presentation on industrial cybersecurity. @mujeebtweaks and Jianying Zhou have investigated ways to detect attacks on sensors in Industrial Control Systems, and ways to isolate them if vulnerable.
#cybersecurity#hacking#security#network#iot
I officially predict a financial crisis some time between now and 2021.
Not because I have any special knowledge or even actually think that, but so that I can have a ~25% (or whatever) chance of later being publicly acclaimed as "a guru who predicted the last financial crisis".