A riddle for scientists: what is (1) better than publishing in Nature, (2) more evil than reviewer 2, (3) the postdocs have it, (4) the Nobel prize winners need it, and (5) if you publish it you perish?
انتهى بكل اسف اجمل شي تابعته برمضان
١٥ حلقة رهيبة
١٥ حلقة راقية
١٥ حلقة كوميديا مختلفه عن اي شي عربي شفته بحياتي .. كتابة ذكية تحترم.
شكراً يا ابن وداد
شكراً يا شفيق انت و #الصفارة
و طبعاً اتمنى الجزء الثاني منو لان لازم اعرف اللي حصل في جمصة
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 @AhmedAmin
🚨SPAAM Q1 2023 publication digest🚨
Metagenomics pipelines, past plagues, new pathogens, and more from the #aDNA world. A productive first quarter of the year for the ancient metagenomics field!
Enjoy your readings!
Most recent work from the lab just out @Nature. By combining ancient DNA work, population genomics, and in vitro infections we show that the Black Death shaped the evolution of immune genes. Kuddos to co-first authors @TaurVil and Jennifer Klunk. https://t.co/y4crzKFMpv
There are things that no one talks about after leaving a toxic workplace or toxic team 🧵.
-the period of decompression you go through
-the bad habits you have to unlearn
-the closure that you never get
1/3
So, kids in bed, can finally tweet about our paper that came out today: https://t.co/kXhLY66UpS And since it's trendy, let me take a stab at this thread-thing. 1/11
I use the 1000 Genomes sample and population metadata frequently enough that I wrote a small #Rstats data package over the weekend, just published to CRAN. In case it's useful to you:
On CRAN: https://t.co/77mx1kg5Ov
Documentation: https://t.co/4RGHlfeuFR